Month: August 2022

The past few years have seen Intel and AMD delivering new processors in a staggered manner. In the sub-45W category, Intel’s incumbency has allowed it to deliver products for both the notebook and ultra-compact form factor (UCFF) within a few months of each other. On the other hand, AMD’s focus has been on the high-margin notebook market, with the chips filtering down to the desktop market a year or so down the road. In this context, AMD’s Cezanne (most SKUs based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture) and Intel’s Tiger Lake went head-to-head last year in the notebook market, while Rembrandt (based on Zen3+) and Alder Lake-P are tussling it out this year. In the desktop space, Cezanne-based mini-PCs started making an appearance a few months back, coinciding with the first wave of Alder Lake-P systems.

ASRock Industrial has the reputation of being one of the first vendors to launch UCFF systems based on the latest available processors from both Intel and AMD. We had reviewed their NUC BOX-1165G7 as our first Tiger Lake-U mini-PC, and the 4X4 BOX-4800U was one of the earliest Renoir-based desktops. The company is continuing the tradition with the NUC BOX-1200 series for Alder Lake-P and the NUC 4X4 BOX-5000 series for Cezanne, with the product announcements coming within a month of each other.

The company sent over the flagship models in both lineups for review, giving us a chance to evaluate the performance and value proposition of the NUC BOX-1260P and 4X4 BOX-5800U. The review below provides a detailed hands-on comparison of the two models. It also brings out various configurable aspects that can be tweaked by the vendor and/or end-user in order to extract the maximum possible performance within the form-factor constraints. In that process, we also gain insights into what helps ASRock Industrial introduce mini-PCs based on the latest processors well ahead of its competitors.

Introduction and Product Impressions

Intel introduced heterogeneous computing into its product line with a mixture of performance (P) and efficiency (E) cores in Alder Lake last year. While the desktop line was first out of the door, Intel followed up with the sub-35W processors in February 2022. Fabricated in Intel 7, Alder Lake brings a multi-tasking focus to computing, providing hints to the OS on where different tasks need to be run. Overall, this is supposed to bring in a better user experience – and the Alder Lake-P series is supposed to deliver all that within a 28W power envelope. On the other hand, AMD’s Cezanne was announced in early 2021, bringing the Zen 3 microarchitecture into the notebook space. The 8C/16T configuration of homogeneous high-performance cores provides it the edge in multi-threaded workloads over Intel’s solutions.

Despite the introduction of the solutions more than a year apart, the ultra-compact form-factor and small form-factor desktop systems utilizing these processors have started getting into the market around the same time. Both Cezanne and Alder Lake-P utilize an updated microarchitecture, promising a healthy performance boost over the previous generation. The integrated GPU is also clocked higher. On the system front, the high-speed I/O options get carried over from Renoir and Tiger Lake – Cezanne continues to retain PCIe 3.0 lanes for storage, and supplies only USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) ports for high-bandwidth external peripherals . In contrast, Alder Lake-P provides four CPU dedicated-connected PCIe 4.0 lanes for storage drives, and two Thunderbolt 4/USB4 ports for external peripherals. Aspects requiring a deeper look include system performance for various types of workloads and power / energy consumption profiles.

ASRock is a well-known vendor in the consumer PC market. In 2011, the company set up the ASRock Industrial business unit to focus on industrial motherboards. The division branched out in 2018 as an independent vendor with exclusive focus on B2B products. The company has products for deployment in small businesses (offices), automation, robotics, security, and other industrial / IoT applications. Primarily, the company develops motherboards, and sells them to various system integrators who can do their own value additions. Additionally, the company also sells mini-PCs based on the developed motherboards into the retail channel.

ASRock Industrial sampled their flagship models in the Alder Lake-P (NUC BOX-1260P) and Cezanne (4X4 BOX-5800U) lineups. It is rare that two flagship products come in for review simultaneously – so we took the opportunity to evaluate them in parallel.

As a reminder, the NUC BOX and 4X4 BOX series both use a chassis tracing its roots back to ASRock’s now defunct Beebox product line. The cooling solution is time-tested within that case design, and all that ASRock Industrial does is to alter the I/O cut-outs slightly to match different motherboards. As the above photograph shows, it is difficult to differentiate between the two systems at first glance, as the cut-outs are exactly the same (in fact, the previous-generation NUC BOX-1165G7 and 4X4 BOX-4800U are the same too) . Only on a closer look does the presence of two black USB 2.0 ports in the rear I/O of the 4X4 BOX-5800U (compared to the blue USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports in the NUC BOX-1260P) serve as a differentiating factor.

ASRock Industrial’s main focus is on B2B customers. It is no surprise that their systems are packaged in a nondescript manner. However, within the package, the company includes everything that an end-user would need – a VESA mount and associated screws, 2.5″ drive and M.2 SSD installation aids, a geo-specific power cord and a 90W power adapter.

ASRock Industrial NUC BOX-1260P Package Contents

ASRock Industrial 4X4 BOX-5800U Package Contents

Since our sample of the NUC BOX-1260P was an early engineering sample, it didn’t have the model number markings on the underside (unlike the 4X4 BOX-5800U). Both samples were barebones – the RAM and disk drive are left to the discretion of the end-user. In order to make an apples-to-apples comparison, we opted to utilize the same set of components used in the reviews of the company’s systems based on Tiger Lake-U and Renoir. The NUC BOX-1260P was equipped with an ADATA XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite and 2x 32GB of the Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMMs. A Patriot Memory P300 SSD and 2x 32GB Patriot Memory DDR4-3200 SODIMMs were installed in the 4X4 BOX-5800U for evaluation.

Beyond the similar build and industrial design, a closer look at the NUC BOX-1260P and the 4X4 BOX-5800U reveal a number of differentiation aspects both internally and externally. They are summarized in the table below. The rationale behind the (BIOS 1.2E) and the (Performance) suffices are covered in the next section.

The 110 mm x 117.5 mm x 47.85 mm chassis used by ASRock Industrial for both systems is made of polycarbonate, though an inner metal frame does exist. The bottom panel is held by four screws that need to be taken out to access the M.2 and SODIMM slots. The top of the chassis is glossy and easily attracts smudges and fingerprints, though it does come with a plastic film that can be retained without any loss of cooling efficiency. The two sides have perforated windows for air intake. The rear panel has openings on top to allow the internal blower fan to exhaust hot air after passing it through the heat spreader.

A closer look at the two cases and internal pictures are available in the galleries above. It can be seen that ASRock Industrial provides support for mounting a 2.5″ drive inside. This makes it difficult to accommodate a thermal gap filler for the M.2 SSD. In fact, the components are densely packed on the board, and even mounting a M.2 2280 SSD requires a special plastic tab that hangs atop one of the USB-C ports on the board.

In the next section, we take a look at the BIOS options along with an analysis of the motherboard platform. Following that, we have a number of sections focusing on various performance aspects before concluding with an analysis of the value proposition of the system.

Image: Goal

Virtual reality is becoming more expensive again. This could slow down the development of the technology, but there is no reason to despair.

The Meta Quest 2 costs a hundred dollars more as of this week. $400 instead of $300. That already makes a difference for end consumers, especially in economically uncertain times like these.

The spontaneous price increase came as a surprise and will most likely have an impact on sales. The question is how much. The Meta Quest 2 contributed to the growth of the VR market like no other headset. If demand goes down, the consequences will be felt.

the days of cheap virtual reality are over. Upcoming headsets like the Playstation VR 2 (info) and Pico 4 (report) are likely to follow the trend and because they introduce new technology, they will be anything but cheap. Not to mention the rumored Quest Pro and Apple’s headset.

meta buckles

The low price of the Meta Quest 2 was made possible by Meta’s fat ad business. Now that this is weakening, Meta is forced to reduce the subsidies. The price dumping has nevertheless achieved its purpose: Meta almost completely controls the VR market.

The price increase is a rare compromise on Meta’s part. The company otherwise always signaled to push virtual reality forward, regardless of the cost. The news must have sent shockwaves in the direction of VR developers. Is the giant wavering after all? That might have been the question of one or the other studio that is betting its future on VR.

The end of the low price period, I argued earlier, was inevitable nonetheless. Virtual Reality has to grow up and stand on its own two feet at some point. That moment is fast approaching and with it the question of whether end users are willing to bear the cost of research and development.

evolution of technology

This has been the case with other electronic devices such as the television, computers, and smartphones, with demand determining how quickly technology evolves. Virtual reality will have to follow the same path, without rock-bottom prices that paint a distorted picture of demand.

The technology needs to hold its own and retain customers, regardless of its technical maturity. Virtual reality is still in its infancy, true! But the industry can no longer use that as an excuse for lack of interest on the part of consumers. Televisions, computers, and smartphones all caught on, even though they were relatively primitive at the beginning compared to today.

Does virtual reality really need fundamental improvements to gain wider acceptance? The next few years will paint a clearer picture, but rapid breakthroughs should not be expected. Technological quantum leaps are rare and, judging by past development, will happen once, maybe twice in a decade. There is no shortcut.

So sit back and enjoy the ride.

Note: Links to online stores in articles can be so-called affiliate links. If you buy through this link, MIXED receives a commission from the provider. For you the price does not change.

Comedian Jimmy Fallon stopped by the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center in Dearborn on Friday afternoon to hang out with Ford CEO Jim Farley and factory workers who build the all-electric F-150 Lightning pickup truck, the Free Press has learned.

“The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon” host spent nearly an hour touring the new factory with Farley and plant manager Corey Williams and Fallon Gates, a manufacturing communications specialist who guides tours on-site.

“I am not sure who enjoyed the visit more, the employees at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center or Jimmy Fallon,” said Fallon Gates, who had her own very funny moment introducing herself to the famous visitor. “Everyone was all smiles. Jimmy said that the tour really blew his mind.”

Jimmy Fallon was making a few stops in metro Detroit; this was just one, Ford said.

Factory workers cheered the actor, who starred on “Saturday Night Live” as did Chris Farley, the late cousin of Jim Farley.

They flocked to get photos taken with the TV host, and many asked the CEO to snap images using employee cellphones as fast as they could make it happen.

Factory workers yelled, “We love you,” and Fallon yelled right back.

The TV host, who has spent time on his talk show discussing the infamous “frunk,” stopped by the site to meet workers who install the enormous front trunk in the pickup.

More:Stick figure man will free you from F-150 Lightning frunk

More:Dwayne Johnson calls Ford factory workers ‘clock punching champions’

Fallon tweeted May 21 a video of himself singing “Junk in my Frunk.”

On Friday, he showed UAW employees photos of his older F-150s and talked trucks, trucks, trucks.

Ford confirmed the information provided to the Free Press about the afternoon event.

The lighthearted get-together between Farley and Fallon comes a week after Ford released second quarter adjusted earnings of $3.7 billion, which exceeded industry expectations. The Lightning plays a key role in Ford’s strategy for him.