NSW Labor frontbencher Walt Secord is stepping down from the shadow ministry after being accused of bullying by past and current colleagues.
Key points:
Walt Secord says he asked to stand aside following a “long reflection”
Several past and present colleagues have accused Mr Secord of bullying
It follows the release of the Broderick review into NSW parliament
Mr Secord, who held several shadow portfolios, said he had asked Opposition Leader Chris Minns to “let me stand aside” after a “long reflection.”
It follows the release of the Broderick review into the culture of the NSW parliament, which exposed a “toxic” environment of bullying and sexual harassment.
Mr Secord has spent more than 30 years in the Labor Party and was serving as the opposition spokesman for police, counter terrorism, arts and heritage and the north coast.
He issued an apology last week after an ABC investigation uncovered allegations against him by several unnamed people.
“Chris [Minns]myself, and the NSW Labor Party have committed to adopting the recommendations of the Broderick review and working across party lines to make the NSW Parliament and NSW politics a workplace we can all be proud of,” he said in a statement.
“I fully support the Broderick review and the change it will hopefully lead to. But my remaining in the shadow ministry at this time has become a distraction from these major revelations and the important work that needs to be done.
“I will be making no further comment.”
Mr Secord is the first NSW politician to step down following the review conducted by former sex discrimination commissioner Elizabeth Broderick.
Last week, Premier Dominic Perrottet said the findings were “sobering, confronting and unacceptable”.
“If parliamentarians cannot lead and provide an environment where the workplace is safe, what hope do we have for other workplaces across our great state?”
On Friday, Mr Secord apologized for his conduct in office, acknowledging he could be “too blunt and too direct” in the high-pressure environment.
“If any parliamentary staff members feel that my conduct in the workplace was unprofessional and caused offense or distress and was unacceptable, I unreservedly apologize,” he said.
The senior Labor figure said he wanted to be part of “repairing the culture in state parliament, and addressing my behavior as part of that”.
Mr Minns has called a press conference for later this morning.
Wake up, eat, go to work, come home, eat, sleep, repeat.
Living the dream, huh?
“Personally, I believe I’m not meant to work. I’m meant to do this all day,” says an audio track on TikTok that went viral for its candid message: working a 9-to-5 job is no longer the ideal lifestyle for many.
loading
One video that uses this audio shows a woman sitting at a cafe, enjoying a coffee and croissant. Ella’s phone camera pans around, revealing a dozen others leisurely doing the same.
It has over three million views.
The video-based app has become a hub for Gen Zs and Millennials to create apathetic and pessimistic commentary about their disillusionment towards work.
What’s fueling this? Toxic workplace culture, minimal flexibility, no work life balance and of course, the pandemic.
Deloitte’s Global 2022 Gen Z & Millennial Survey revealed four in 10 Gen Zs and nearly a quarter of Millennials would like to leave their jobs in two years.
Roughly a third would do so without another job lined upthe report found.
However, if you love what you do, is it true that you’ll never work a day in your life?
Engineer-turned-career-development practitioner Naishadh Gadani said the dream job is “an overly simplistic and misused term”.
“Rather than thinking of it as a dream job, we should be questioning whether it’s a fulfilling job,” Mr Gadani told ABC News.
“Questions like: What fulfills me? What brings me happiness? What kind of workplace or organization do I like? – [these] can help us.”
Juliette had ‘golden ticket’ job but quit and now works casually in hospitality
Juliette, 22, from Victoria, landed her first white-collar job from her sister’s roommate at the time, who worked in the public service.
After hearing that she was looking for trainees who required no qualifications, Juliette applied and was offered the job.
“It was a golden ticket because I was 20, had no qualifications past a mediocre ATAR, and was now working full-time and getting paid a decent wage.
“I received a lot of praise from friends and family. It was a job that my family could gloat about,” she said.
After nine months into the job, Juliette quit. She said she felt like a failure.
“I had spent months toying with the idea of whether money or my mental health was more important,” she said.
Four months after she quit, Juliette traded full-time work for a casual job in hospitality and she has never been happier.
“My job isn’t who I am. I don’t base my worth on my productivity within capitalism.”
Despite her reduced working hours, coupled with a rising cost of living, Juliette remains “optimistic” about the future.
“As bad as things are economically, it’s just a cycle. There are bigger problems than my wallet.”
Alex’s dream was to play in a band. I realized it was not as glamorous as it sounded
Alex, 32, was in his first year of university when a friend asked what he wanted to do for a career.
“She said to ignore the money and say the first thing that came to mind. I blurted out: ‘I want to play in a band.’
“That’s the moment I decided playing in a band was my ‘dream job’,” he said.
However, as Alex became more involved in Brisbane’s music scene, he saw how the life of a band member wasn’t as glamorous as their fans might suspect.
“Playing shows to hundreds of fans sounds incredible, but this is only a small part of a touring musician’s life,” he said.
Over the years, Alex decided he wouldn’t let a job consume his identity, so he allowed himself to simply “have a job.”
His current “day job” is working in the aerospace sector. But he hasn’t given up on ditching the 9-to-5 routine.
“I’ve recently gotten into making my own YouTube videos as well as editing them for clients. So, that’s another possibility,” he explained.
Alex said his ideal situation would be to play local shows in small venues, as opposed to touring nationally or internationally.
“I don’t see that as a failure. So long as I’m enjoying playing music, that’s a success in my mind,” he said.
Owning a home is ‘unachievable’ for Ishara, but she believes this is no longer the dream for young people
During primary school, Ishara Sahama, 23, dreamed of becoming a vet.
It wasn’t until her final years of high school — when she gravitated towards the humanities and social sciences field.
After graduating university with a major in geography in 2019, Ms Sahama spent a few years volunteering and gaining work experience.
She now works part-time in the social enterprise and entrepreneurship space.
“Ever since I started working, I’ve seen people who are either in their mid-20s-30s, or in their 40-50s, resign from the public sector and move to private, or vice-versa,” Ms Sahama said.
“Pushing young people to pick a dream job — or will it into existence — can be detrimental to their personal growth.”
“The past two years have changed the way work is conducted. A 9-to-5 job, five days a week can be condensed to four days,” she said.
“And, yet, people who do or don’t have this work structure may still struggle to keep up with Australia’s rising cost of living.”
Ms Sahama saves on certain costs by living with her family, paying for petrol and groceries, costs that have only increased over time.
While these costs are manageable for her, Ishara feels indifferent when it comes to buying a home.
“The idea of owning, or leasing, a property in the future is now unachievable for me, considering current economic circumstances,” she said.
“The ‘Australian Dream’ is a luxury and a privilege. It doesn’t reflect everyday realities of young people who must change and adapt to the workforce in a post-COVID world.”
A senior doctor at Adelaide’s biggest hospital says the health system is under “siege” and pinpoints Mondays as the busiest day.
Key points:
South Australia’s hospitals are usually busiest on Mondays
Discharging patients on weekends is harder due to fewer available services
Patients coming in for elective surgery on Monday also add to demand
SA’s struggling health system was again in focus this week due to the death of a 47-year-old man while he waited for an ambulance in suburban Adelaide on Monday.
Problems around ramped ambulances, overcrowded emergency departments and full inpatient hospital beds, trouble doctors and nurses on any day of the week.
But each Monday a perfect storm of complications aligns, cranking up pressure on health staff and patients.
So, what makes Monday the busiest day in SA’s hospitals, and what can be done about it?
A weekend hangover
As medical lead of the surgery program at the Royal Adelaide Hospital and chair of the Australian Medical Association Council, Peter Subramaniam knows South Australia’s health system well.
He says it is under “siege”.
“The system is under pressure and there is a significant demand and our capacity to meet that demand is not working,” Dr Subramaniam said.
The qualified vascular surgeon pinpointed Mondays as the busiest days for hospitals.
“You can see from the data we have that ours are lower on the weekend compared to weekdays,” he discharge said.
“So that contributes to the log jam that occurs on a Monday.”
Dr Subramaniam said fewer doctors working to patients over the weekend had an impact discharge.
“Most acute care hospitals operate on reduced staffing,” he said.
But that’s not the only thing bringing down discharge numbers.
“We rely heavily on community services to be available and accessible over weekends and often that’s difficult to organize,” Dr Subramaniam said.
“You might need a rehab bed or a step-down bed or a community nursing service to be able to manage the patient once they’re discharged.
“Once we’ve discharged the patients, they need to go somewhere.”
monday blues
Chief executive of the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Association’s SA branch Elizabeth Dabars said the “absence of senior clinicians” on the weekend was driving up ramping times.
Professor Dabars wants to see nurses, allied health professionals and junior doctors able to discharge more acute patients under something called criteria-led discharge (CLD).
“It’s a win for the people wanting to go home and it’s a win for the broader community who would have better access to hospital beds,” the qualified nurse said.
CLD has been hotly debated for decades and was a policy directive issued by SA Health in 2019.
Professor Dabars said it was never fully implemented.
“That has not really seriously been put in place and that is a blocker to people being discharged,” she said.
“It doesn’t actually make sense for it not to be enabled.”
But the former president of the South Australian Salaried Medical Officers Association, Dr David Pope, said the number of patients that would fit the CLD criteria was small.
“Item [CLD] works quite well in some areas but I defy anyone to go around and find patients sitting around in the hospital for want of a doctor to come in on a Monday morning,” Dr Pope said.
“That just doesn’t happen.”
He said a crowded start to the week was a side effect of elective surgery.
“That worse effect on a Monday is purely a function of when elective surgery patients arrive,” he said.
The doctor said the idea that senior clinicians were unwilling to provide care on weekends was damaging to an already stretched workforce.
“Doctors are in the hospitals 24/7, so if there’s a need for a doctor to be in the hospital they will be there if they exist,” he said.
What will change?
The state government said it was looking to make criteria-led discharge “a regular part of hospital operations.”
“Expanding its use will reduce bed-block by ensuring patients ready for discharge can leave hospital, freeing up beds for those in the emergency department and easing pressure on frontline workers,” a government spokesperson said.
Dr Subramaniam said he supported the “safe” implementation of the policy.
“Criteria-led discharging is part and parcel of a modern healthcare facility and it’s strongly supported,” he said.
But he said it needed support to work effectively.
“We need the right level of resources,” he said.
“We need more efficient ways of using those resources and we need to strengthen our community care.”
He said addressing other issues, such as transitioning long-stay NDIS patients out of hospitals, was complex and would take time.
“If we don’t achieve a system response to dealing with acute care and the challenges that are going to come, we’re going to find patients are going to be left by the wayside,” he said.
McDonald’s has been slapped with a wage theft claim of at least $250 million in the Federal Court over alleged denial of paid breaks to workers.
Key points:
McDonald’s workers were allegedly denied 10-minute breaks that they were entitled to
SDA is seeking at least $250 million in compensation plus penalties on behalf of the workers
The fast food giant intends to defend the allegations
The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association (SDA) is seeking compensation on behalf of more than 250,000 current and former McDonald’s workers across Australia.
If successful, the union said the claim would be one of the largest of its kind in Australia’s history.
The SDA is alleging workers at more than 1,000 current and former McDonald’s sites were denied their uninterrupted 10-minute break when working four hours or more during a shift.
South Australia branch secretary Josh Peak said McDonald’s workers were told if they want their paid break, they cannot get a drink or go to the toilet.
He said in almost two years of investigation the union had heard more than 10,000 accounts from former and current employees, including young Australians, at McDonald’s stores across Australia.
“Workers were systematically, deliberately denied the rights to those breaks,” Mr Peak told ABC Radio Adelaide Breakfast.
“It’s just not good enough that a large employer such as McDonalds would create a scheme that leads to people not being paid correctly or getting base entitlements.”
The statement of claim alleged workers had to seek permission to get a drink or go to the bathroom and could be directed to resume work before their 10-minute break was up.
Mr Peak said workers were misled or not informed about their rest break entitlements and the multi-billion dollar corporation should be penalized for it.
“It is really outrageous behavior to be tricking young people into thinking they are not entitled to go the toilet if they used their paid entitlements,” he said.
“Workers never got their paid 10-minute rest break and when workers did ask for it, they were told ‘we don’t do that here because you can go the toilet whenever you like’, which is completely ludicrous.”
The claim named 323 McDonald’s operators who allegedly denied paid rest breaks to workers over the past six years.
McDonald’s Australia issued a statement in which it denied the claims.
“McDonald’s believes its restaurants complied with applicable instruments, provided rest breaks to employees and were consistent with historic working arrangements,” a McDonald’s spokeswoman said.
“Those arrangements have been known to the SDA for many years. The manner of taking breaks has not been challenged or raised by the SDA as a matter of concern throughout successive enterprise bargaining processes for new industrial agreements.
“We are very mindful of our obligations under applicable employment laws, including the former enterprise agreement and the Fast Food Industry Award, and continue to work closely with our restaurants to ensure employees receive all correct workplace entitlements and pay.”
Claim originates from SA
The new claim is in conjunction with the SDA’s 15 existing Federal Court claims against McDonald’s Australia and 14 franchisees — seven of them in South Australia.
In December 2020, 14 McDonald’s employees at the Frewville and Mount Barker restaurants lodged a compensation claim after allegedly being denied their 10-minute rest break.
As a result of that action, the investigation extended nationwide.
Isabelle, who worked at McDonald’s in the Adelaide CBD for almost five years, said she was not given her entitled 10-minute break, but instead was allowed drink breaks freely during shifts.
“The drink break was only for 20 seconds, or as fast as you could drink and then come back to work straightaway,” she said.
“I’d spoken to my bosses about it and they just told us that we didn’t get them, they chose to do something different, and that it was legal, it was all fine.
“There were a lot of managers who would get angry if you needed to go to the bathroom and have a drink break.
“They saw it as you being lazy and not actually doing what you need to do.”
She said she was scared of other managers at her former workplace, even when she was in managerial positions.
“I remembered thinking, what do I need more? Do I need a drink more or do I need to go to the bathroom more — and then you just pick from there,” she said.
“Now that we’re going into an actual, normal workplace, we know that that definitely wasn’t normal to be stressed about going to the bathroom or getting a drink.”
Mr Peak said the same story was being repeated across the country.
He said the claim was also about sending a message to other franchises.
“It’s also about sending a signal right throughout the entire fast food industry that young workers, just because they’re young, doesn’t mean you can lie to them.”
The early days of the COVID-19 pandemic triggered a mass exodus of workers from central business district (CBD) offices — but, from this, came a new, hybrid work model that accommodated for employees’ unique needs.
While remote work remains the preference for many, some offices have struggled to convince their staff to make the trek back into central business districts and, experts say, it has come at a cost to newcomers.
In almost every major Australian city, during the month of June, new data from the Property Council of Australia shows commercial occupancy rates fell.
That rate is the measure of the area of rented space compared to area of total space available.
Melbourne’s commercial occupancy rate dropped from 49 per cent to 38 per cent, while Sydney’s fell from 55 per cent to 52 per cent.
Brisbane’s fell from 64 per cent to 53 per cent, while Adelaide’s dropped from 71 per cent to 64 per cent.
The only markets to record an increase in commercial occupancy were Canberra and Perth, where the rate rose from 53 per cent to 61 per cent and 65 per cent to 71 per cent, respectively.
Is working from home to blame?
The main culprit, according to the Property Council’s chief executive, Ken Morrison, is illness.
Mr Morrison said the results were disappointing, but not surprising.
“Office occupancy numbers have gone backwards for the first time in six months as a wave of [COVID-19’s] Omicron and flu cases kept workers away from the office,” he said.
“We have been seeing a steady increase in the number of workers returning to offices, but this stalled in June and has now declined in most capitals.
With winter nearly over, he said, it was encouraging that the latest COVID-19 wave had nearly run its course and that “recovery momentum can resume.”
Remote work not a ‘zero-cost exercise’
When occupancy rates drop off, small businesses, such as cafes, can miss out on a vital revenue stream.
Mr Morrison said governments needed to be mindful that encouraging people to work from home was not a “zero-cost exercise”.
“The costs are real and we see them in the vibrancy of our CBDs,” he said.
“We know office occupancy has been slow to recover, unlike other indicators, which snap back quickly.”
Are falling occupancy rates here to stay?
Tom Broderick — who heads up CBRE’s capital markets research — doesn’t think so.
“I think this appears to be a bit of a blip, with these most recent figures,” he said.
The July survey found the preference for greater flexibility, including working from home, was a better driver of occupancy levels, but this decreased from 63 per cent to 48 per cent.
Health concerns surrounding the latest COVID-19 wave were also a major influence on the data.
Mr Broderick said there could have been a simpler explanation: holidays.
“A lot of people in Melbourne and Sydney hadn’t been able to travel in 2020 and 2021,” he said.
“We’ve seen a lot of people take advantage of that by going away in July, so that has an impact on occupancy as well.”
While business leaders “absolutely” embraced hybrid work arrangements — leaning into platforms like Zoom and Teams to communicate remotely — Mr Broderick said having fewer people in offices meant “collaboration just falls apart.”
“Younger graduates do need to learn by osmosis,” he said, suggesting they need to overhear and watch senior people doing their work.
“And that’s lost when such a significant portion of people work from home.
“For the people who are making the effort to come to the office, is it really worth it when there’s only 20 to 30 per cent of your team actually in the office?”
So-called medi-hotels formed a key part of Mark McGowan’s pitch to voters at the 2017 election, but five years on there is little sign of them.
Key points:
Three medi-hotels were promised, but only Royal Perth Hospital’s has opened
The opposition is criticizing a shift to mental health beds in Joondalup
The government expects a Murdoch medi-hotel to be opened within a year
Sold as a way to solve what was then labeled a “crisis” in the health system, three facilities were promised to free up hospital beds and ease strain on the system.
It was imagined they would mostly be used by regional patients who no longer needed the care of a full hospital bed but were not yet ready to go home.
Three were promised, but so far, the only one to open is a four-bed facility at Royal Perth Hospital.
Work on another, being built by a private provider in Murdoch, is under way with hopes it will be open in the next year.
But the third, promised by Joondalup, appears to be no more, with the Health Minister yesterday telling parliament for the second time that plans had changed.
“We’ve actually made a bigger investment in Joondalup Health Campus, an even bigger investment than a medi-hotel, by expanding the bed base and [adding] 102 mental health beds,” Amber-Jade Sanderson said.
“In discussion with the local community, and with the local provider, that’s what they wanted.”
Joondalup plan disintegrates
Cracks started to show when what was planned to be the first facility, near Fiona Stanley Hospital, was already a year behind schedule before the pandemic.
But plans for others remained alive, including when then-health minister Roger Cook told parliament in September 2021 that development approval had been received for a 110-bed mental health unit at Joondalup, with 90 inpatient beds also on the agenda.
Mr Cook said while the focus was on completing the first phase of the expansion, “ambitions” remained for a medi-hotel in the future.
But just eight months later his replacement, Ms Sanderson, told budget estimates the now 102-bed mental health facility would be a “far greater contribution” than a medi-hotel – a sentiment she echoed yesterday.
Not all of those 102 beds are new or will open at the same time though.
The Joondalup Health Campus website notes the project contains only 30 additional beds, the same as was initially promised in 2019.
Of the remainder, 47 are described as “replacement” beds, while 25 will be “shelled to meet future demand”.
Ms Sanderson said at the time that all would be operational by February 2026.
The 90-inpatient-bed promise remains unchanged from three years ago, with the website revealing that it will comprise 30 in an inpatient ward and 66 “shelled” for future demand.
Row over what beds are best
The original aim of medi-hotels was to free up hospital capacity by giving people somewhere else to stay when they did not need a full-blown bed.
Ms Sanderson said the new mental health beds at Joondalup would be even more effective at achieving that outcome.
“Those mental health beds will take pressure off the beds within the main hospital, and will provide a much more appropriate place for those patients to be treated and recover from their episodes,” she said.
But opposition health spokeswoman Libby Mettam questioned that claim, saying it was “simply not true” to say the mental health beds would replace the medi-hotel promise.
“Medi-hotel beds play a very different role to mental health beds, and quite clearly the McGowan government have stepped away from this election commitment,” she said.
“The purpose of medi-hotels is to be an alternative to the more expensive hospital beds and address the very real issue of bed block across our hospital system.
“[It’s] disappointing to hear confirmation in parliament that it is no longer part of the McGowan government’s strategy for delivery, probably because they are struggling to deliver the current sets of projects under their books.”
Talks on Fiona Stanley medi-hotel
The Fiona Stanley medi-hotel remains under construction, with the private developer’s plans including an urgent care clinic and consulting rooms.
Ms Sanderson told parliament she expected it would be operational within the next year.
“That will provide really important relief, particularly for Fiona Stanley Hospital, and we’re in contract negotiations with that contract provider now,” she said.
But Ms Mettam said that it was time an already strained system could hardly afford to wait.
“This points to why our emergency departments and hospitals still struggle with bed block and the highest level of ambulance ramping on record,” she said.
Australian Medical Association WA president Mark Duncan-Smith said while medi-hotel beds did have a role to play, they were no replacement for proper hospital beds.
“Medi-hotels are really a second-tier lever to pull on trying to increase capacity of the health system,” he said.
“I would rather see that money be redirected to actually create extra tertiary hospital beds, which is a more direct lever to increase capacity of the system.”
Shops would be allowed to open two hours earlier on a Sunday under new laws set to go into state Parliament next month.
Key points:
The SA government is looking to allow shops to trade from 9am on Sundays
The bill would also shops outside the Adelaide CBD to open on Boxing Day
Reforming shop trading has been a Labor election promise
Consultation on the reforms has begun with Premier Peter Malinauskas describing the changes as “sensible”.
Under the proposal, shops will be allowed to trade from 9am on Sunday as opposed to the current laws which only allow them to open at 11am.
The bill would also also allow metropolitan shops outside the Adelaide CBD to operate on Boxing Day.
“It’s about getting the balance right. It’s supported by business, it’s supported by workers,” the Premier said.
The reforms tighten how exemptions are issued to allow trade on public holidays. The former Liberal government used those powers to allow stores to open in the suburbs on public holidays during the last term, including on Easter Monday.
“We don’t think a free-for-all in terms of the exemption regime that the former government sought to exploit is necessarily the right approach,” Mr Malinauskas said.
The opposition is yet to consider the amendments put forward by the government.
“I do note that on recent public holidays, South Australian shoppers who have gone to the shops have been very disappointed to find out that under the new regime those shops have been closed,” said opposition spokesperson John Gardner.
For the bill to pass parliament’s Upper House, Labor needs the support of either the Greens, SA Best or the Liberals.
The union representing SA retail workers welcomed the proposal but say shop trading hours should not be at the expense of workers and local businesses to the interests of interstate and overseas supermarket giants.
“For us, this consultation is about protecting retail workers’ right to be treated with respect, to have a fair roster and to have public holidays off,” Shop Distributive and Allied Employees Association secretary Josh Peak said.
“Our shop trading hours are one of the reasons we have one of the most diverse and most competitive supermarket sectors in Australia and this must be safeguarded.”
Drakes Supermarket director John-Paul Drake was supportive of an early start on Sundays.
“We have line-ups at 11am at every store every Sunday,” he said.
“More money goes into the economy, we’d employ more people and they are going to get more hours — so it’s a win-win for everyone.”
He preferred the proposed rules to deregulating shopping hours, which he said would be a “free-for-all” and benefit the “duopoly in this state” the most.
The South Australian Labor Partywill return a $125,000 donation from the construction union, a decision that was prompted by the alleged vandalism of vehicles belonging to staff from the Master Builders Association.
Key points:
The Victorian branch of the CFMEU donated $125,000 to the SA Labor Party before the March election
SA Labor has now confirmed it will return the money
Cars with Master Builders Association branding were allegedly vandalized with CFMEU stickers last week
The Victorian branch of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) made the donation in the lead-up to the March election in South Australia.
For several weeks, Premier Peter Malinauskas has been resisting calls for the donation to be returned or given to charity, despite going into the election with a promise to ban donations to political parties for future elections.
SA Labor state secretary Aemon Bourke confirmed on Monday the donation would be returned to the Victorian CFMEU.
Opposition spokeswoman for women Michelle Lensink last week called on Mr Malinauskas to donate the money to a domestic violence charity after Victorian CFMEU boss John Setka formally took control of the union’s South Australian branch.
Mr Setka’s ex-wife Emma Walters also called for the money to be passed on to a domestic violence charity and has previously voiced concerns over the donation to the Labor Party.
In 2019, Mr Setka was convicted of harassing Ms Walters via text messages while they were still together.
“What I’d actually rather see is that he [Mr Malinauskas] actually go to domestic violence shelters and actually put together care packages for women who have had the courage and courage to escape domestic violence situations,” Ms Walters told ABC Radio Adelaide.
Mr Malinauskas this morning said he was prompted to return the money after speaking with Master Builders Association chief executive Will Frogley at an event on Sunday.
“Will explained to me the events that had occurred, reportedly, on Friday afternoon in terms of CFMEU stickers being put on Master Builders Association cars and also the damage to a car as well,” Mr Malinauskas said.
“Just as I foreshadowed whenever I’ve been asked about this over the past couple of weeks, I said that if there was any evidence that would suggest that inappropriate behavior on behalf of the CFMEU was coming across the border from Victoria, if there’s examples of that or evidence of that occurring here in South Australia then I will act and that’s exactly what I did yesterday afternoon upon hearing that news.”
Mr Malinauskas said he had resisted calls by Ms Lensink to donate the money to a domestic violence charity based on Mr Setka’s previous conviction because the money came from the CFMEU and not Mr Setka personally.
Mr Frogley confirmed to ABC Radio Adelaide that cars had been damaged on Friday evening but would not go into details regarding CFMEU stickers allegedly being placed on the vehicles.
He said as a result of Friday’s incident, he had increased security at the Master Builders Association and would be installing additional surveillance cameras.
“Everyone in my team should be able to come into work feeling completely unintimidated and safe,” he said.
Mr Frogley said the incident had been reported to police.
He also said he backed Mr Malinauskas’s position on banning political donations.
“Rightly or wrongly, there is always going to be this perception that you’re buying political muscle by doing that,” he said.
“Does Master Builders try to influence government policy? You bet we do, but we don’t donate to any political party. Instead, we focus on putting forward a compelling case on facts based on evidence, based on data on why government policy should be a certain way.”
The New South Wales Labor party has announced its first candidate ahead of the 2023 election to take on the embattled high-profile Kiama MP Gareth Ward.
Key points:
Labor has announced former journalist Katelin McInerney will challenge Gareth Ward for the seat of Kiama at the 2023 election.
The lifelong Kiama resident said she wanted a better future for her two-year-old son William.
The announcement comes as the party grapples with the expulsion of two local party stalwarts and the resignation of local branch members.
Former journalist, unionist and life-long Kiama resident Katelin McInerney is hoping to unseat Mr Ward, who was suspended from parliament after he was accused of historic indecent and sexual assault offences.
The former government minister, who denies the charges has refused to resign in the wake of his suspension and recently defended his right to stay on as MP.
His matter returns to court later this month.
On Saturday, Ms McInerney said she would not ignore Mr Ward’s absence from Macquarie Street during her eight-month campaign.
“As a resident here, I can’t ignore the fact that we do not have a voice on the floor of parliament,” she said.
“We have an MP who is not allowed to take our concerns and to represent our interests in the room where it happens.
“We deserve a real voice in parliament and a local member who is able to not just be a member of parliament but a member in the parliament of NSW,” Ms McInerney said.
‘A tough seat to win’
She said she was “deeply concerned” about her two-year-old son William’s future and it was a driving influence behind her decision to stand.
“Because of that I will work tirelessly to move the needle on the things that matter most to the people that work here.
“Fixing our hospitals, fixing our schools, reducing the congestion on our roads, ensuring that development in this beautiful region is not only sustainable but that it reflects our community,” Ms McInerney said.
Labor leader Chris Minns said Mr Ward’s strong hold over the seat was the reason the party had named his candidate eight months out from the election.
“That’s recognition of the fact that it will be a tough seat to win,” he said.
“Katelin knows that, we all know that. We will fight for every vote.”
Mr Ward won the seat from Labor’s Matt Brown in 2011, who controversially resigned from his role as Police Minister after allegedly hosting a wild post-budget election party in his parliamentary office.
Members expelled, resign
Just days before Ms McInerney’s selection was announced, the New South Wales Branch of the Labor Party announced it had expelled Mr Brown from the party.
A spokesperson said he was due to his decision to run against an endorsed party candidate at the Kiama local government elections in December.
Mr Brown declined to comment.
His expulsion came a fortnight after party stalwart, former Shellharbour Mayor Marianne Saliba had her 35-year membership revoked, on the same grounds.
In the days prior to her expulsion, she was accused of reversing over the foot of a rival candidate, and stepson of sitting Shellharbour MP Anna Watson.
Several local branch members who supported Ms Saliba’s tilt at the recent fresh election in Shellharbour Ward A, have since resigned from the party concerned over her treatment.
sticking to the rules
Mr Minns has played down the exits and infighting plaguing the local branches and said it was not akin to the “scandals” impacting the Perrottet government.
“We’ve got long established principles in relation to the suspension and disciplinary matters in relation to people who run against endorsed candidates.
“It’s been that way inside the Labor party for 130 years. Nothing has changed about our internal rules of management of candidate selection.”
Voters in NSW will go to the polls on March 25, 2023.
Tucked away in Parliament House office, once occupied by Tony Abbott and Clive Palmer, now sits the 47th Parliament’s youngest new member.
At age 27, Senator Fatima Payman is making history and it’s a pretty big adjustment.
“I’ve told my friends ‘please don’t call me senator’. I’m still getting used to the title,” she laughed.
Senator Payman’s small team consists of young women just as eager as her for the first sitting fortnight of the new parliament.
It’s safe to say Fatima Payman is vastly different from the men who’ve sat at this very desk and in the Senate chamber she now frequents.
She came to Australia with her family as a refugee from Afghanistan in 2003 and was raised in the northern suburbs of Perth, where she became a union organiser.
Now, she’s the youngest member of the 47th Parliament and the first Afghan-born hijab-wearing senator. She says she’s a “representative of modern Australia.”
“It just feels unreal to me. It’s an absolute privilege,” Senator Payman said.
The new Labor politician is representative of an election result that demonstrated Australians wanted politics done differently, electing an array of fresh faces in what is now one of Australia’s most diverse parliaments yet.
She said she wanted to turn a tide in Australian politics, having gone to the 2022 federal election with a focus on ambitious climate action, an “anti-corruption commission with teeth”, and fee-free TAFE courses.
But with her new role comes a unique kind of pressure, one that few of her colleagues have experienced.
Senator Payman says she’s already trying to manage the expectations of the many diverse groups she’s part of – including her Afghan and Perth communities, young Australians, women, migrants, and people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.
“Having people’s hopes and dreams attached to your sort of progress and the work you do is quite a lot of pressure,” she said.
Nevertheless, she said the pressure was born out of knowing how important it is for all Australians to see themselves reflected in the nation’s most important institution — something she wished her late father could have seen her achieve.
“As ethnic households, politics is discussed at the dinner table all the time, but it never occurred to me that it was a career that I would take upon,” she said.
What’s most notable about Senator Payman is her youth. She was giddy and nervous as she watched the cameras and lights set up for her sit-down interview, repeating “I’m new to all of this” and hiding her slightly chipped nails from the camera’s view.
As the third-youngest senator in Australian history, she follows West Australian Greens senator Jordon Steele-John, who became the youngest-ever senator at age 23, and former South Australian senator Natasha Stott Despoja, who famously strode into Parliament House wearing Doc Marten boots at age 26, before going on to become the youngest elected leader of a political party.
Senator Payman looks at her youth as a strength, one that makes her, and her fellow young senators stand out in the stuffy, old building on Capital Hill.
She said she was using her age as a tool to advocate for other young Australians, who she said went into the federal election having lost faith in the political system and were continually ignored when it came to important legislation.
“I hope that my presence will be welcoming but also a beacon of hope for many out there, especially the young demographic that often see themselves slip through the cracks when it comes to massive legislation,” she said.
“It’s important that young people are brought to the table.”
Senator Payman used her now-viral first address to the Senate to mark the historic moment of her election to the 47th parliament.
“Who would’ve thought that a young woman born in Afghanistan and a daughter of a refugee would be standing in this chamber today,” she told the Senate.
“One hundred years ago, let alone 10 years ago, would this parliament have been this accepting? 100 years ago, let alone 10 years ago, would this parliament accept a woman choosing a hijab to be elected?”
She used the opportunity to tell young girls who chose to wear a hijab to do so with pride.
“For those who choose to advise me about what I should wear or judge my competence based on my internal experience, know that the hijab is my choice,” Senator Payman said.
“I want young girls who choose to wear a hijab to do it with pride and knowledge they have the right.”
The historic moment comes shy of five years since One Nation’s Pauline Hanson wore a burqa in the Senate to call for the dress to be banned in Australia.
“I think it’s unfortunate that I can’t claim to be the first person who has worn Muslim attire inside those same chambers,” Senator Payman said.
“Heck, this is who I am. I want people to accept me for who I am.”
First speeches often allow a politician to tell their life story.
Senator Payman also used her address to thank her late father, becoming emotional as she acknowledged his sacrifices when bringing her family to Australia.
She later revealed the speech took place on what would have been her father’s 52nd birthday.
“We have all heard ‘it takes a village to raise a child’. This truly hits home for me. I’d like my first gratitude to be expressed to my late beloved, whose sacrifices will never be forgotten and who I dearly wish was here to see how far his little daughter has come,” she said.
“Knowing the sacrifices that my dad went through as a taxi driver [and] security guard to ensure he saved enough money to make ends meet to support this family and to ensure that my siblings and I had the future that he wasn’t able to secure for himself.”