energy crisis – Michmutters
Categories
Business

Senex Energy announces plans for a $1 billion expansion of its Surat Basin gas project

Queensland’s Surat Basin may be home to the state’s main coal seam gas region but it could be about to get a whole lot bigger.

Senex Energy, which is owned by Gina Rinehart’s Hancock Energy and South Korean steel maker Posco, has announced a $1 billion expansion of its natural gas developments in the Surat Basin, which includes hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

The expansion, which still needs approval from federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek, will increase the company’s gas production to 60 petajoules (PJ) per year from the end of 2025.

Producing enough electricity to power more than 2.7 million homes each year, it is equivalent to more than 10 per cent of the east coast’s annual domestic gas requirements.

In a speech to industry leaders in Brisbane on Thursday, federal Resources Minister Madeleine King urged them to expand amid warnings a gas shortage could lead to higher prices.

“More supply of gas is a good thing in the domestic market and for the international markets,” Ms King said.

“We want to have a sustainable and ongoing system of gas supply for the domestic market, while also honoring the arrangements companies have in place and Australia has in place with our international partners.”

Filling domestic demand

According to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) interim report of its inquiry into gas supply, there is a significant risk to the east coast’s energy security in 2023.

Two men walk through gas pipes
Resources Minister Madeleine King is encouraging gas production expansions.(Supplied: Senex Energy)

“The outlook for 2023 is very concerning and is likely to place further upward pressure on prices, which could result in some commercial and industrial users no longer being able to operate,” the report said.

“Liquified natural gas (LNG) exporters are expected to contribute to the shortfall in 2023 by withdrawing 58PJ more gas from the domestic market than they expect to supply into the market.”

An ‘obligation’ to Asia

Senex Energy chief executive Ian Davies said the supply would be mostly directed to the domestic market.

“[The] majority is absolutely domestic, but we do have an obligation, which we take quite seriously, [in] supporting our Asian neighbors to decarbonise and provide energy security,” he said.

“We have an [international] supply arrangement with Gladstone LNG for a minority of that 60PJ.

“We’re fundamentally a domestic company focused on a domestic supply.”

Two men sit at a table
Senex Energy CEO Ian Davies [R] says the project will create 50 ongoing jobs.(Supplied: Senex Energy)

Landowners ‘deeply concerned’

Senex said its expansion would create 200 jobs during construction at its Atlas and Roma North projects, and 50 ongoing roles, and inject $200 million into the region’s economies.

But property owners in Queensland’s south-west have already felt the impact of gas wells in their backyard.

Ellie Smith of the Lock the Gate Alliance said she was “deeply concerned” about the impact of Senex’s proposed expansion.

“We don’t believe that will have any impact on prices that Queenslanders are facing with this gas price crisis,” she said.

“We’re seeing gas exported overseas when we need it at home, and the only way that we can bring energy prices down is by supporting manufacturers and Australians to shift to renewables.

“What we need to see the federal government do is put in place the gas price caps and the gas trigger to keep more gas onshore to really combat this predatory behavior by the gas industry, so we can see prices come down and protect our farmland and not open new areas to gas fields.”

The ACCC’s interim report recommended the government consider intervening in the market by pulling what’s known as the “gas trigger” to ensure there was enough supply.

Filling a supply shortfall

Queensland Resources Council chief executive Ian Macfarlane said the proposed expansion would pick up the shortfall from Australia’s southern states.

A man stands at a lecture, with a screen behind him that reads the Hon Ian Macfarlane MP
Ian Macfarlane claims the expansion will pick up the shortfall from other states.(AAP: Lukas Coch)

“It is a significant step by Senex in terms of helping this shortage of supply in Victoria and New South Wales,” he said.

“The shortage has come about because Victoria does not explore for [unconventional] gas onshore and New South Wales as a gas industry has been tied up by red and green type.

He said it would set some “certainty about supply in the future”.

“Spot prices are spot prices, and the actual supply of gas today and tomorrow will continue to be affected by the fact that the Victorians and New South Welshmen have not developed their own supply and gas is short globally.”

Potential price drop

Mr Macfarlane said consumers could expect a price drop in coming years as certainty returned to the domestic market.

“there will be a continuation of higher prices in the short term, but with the hope and certainty of lower prices going forward,” he said.

“It’ll be very strong interest and coming from domestic buyers, both here in Queensland and also in southern states.

“Industries such as brickworks, glass making, but also of course, power generation — there’s a whole range of industry that relies on gas, and there’ll be very strong competition in the market for it.”

.

Categories
Business

Simple way to fix Australia’s east coast energy crisis

Slowly but surely, the story of the greatest rip-off in Aussie history is coming out. It’s not a great train robbery. Not a Sydney wealth management fraud. It is an investment boom that miraculously turned east Australian resources bounty into a pair of concrete boots for the broader economy.

This is the sorry tale of how foreign cartels stole Australian gas reserves and fed them to China while the local economy was starved of it.

It began during the GFC-period when advances in unconventional gas extraction (fracking, shale, coal seam etc) made huge reserves in Queensland viable for extraction. Three conglomerates of largely multinational firms built infrastructure systems across the east of the state to extract, pipe and freeze that gas for export.

They spent some $80 billion doing so, in a mad race that duplicated everything, over-invested in production and crashed the global gas price, forcing them to write off tens of billions on their investment.

Meanwhile, in poor little Australia, which actually owned the gas, the moment the export trains opened the price began to rise because there was not enough left over for locals.

The price rose from $4Gj relentlessly until we were paying $20Gj in 2017 – more for our own gas than our Asian customers.

Worse, because gas sets the marginal cost of electricity on the east coast, whenever its cost rises, power prices go mad as well, hugely multiplying the negative impacts on the economy.

The Turnbull government recognized the folly of this in 2017 and installed the Australian Domestic Gas Security Mechanism (ADGSM). That crashed the gas price back under $10Gj, though it remained much higher than it had been traditionally.

But that was not the end of it. Whenever there has been cold weather, or coal or other outages in the power market, or international shortages, the gas cartel has popped up again to squeeze local prices higher.

This serial debacle most recently came to a head with the war in Ukraine and Russian sanctions which have left the world short of gas and Australian prices have gone to as high as $65Gj, the market has been suspended and electricity prices have been driven up by 600 per cent to boot.

This is a $50 billion gouge by the energy cartels that are effectively war-profiteering at every Australian’s expense. Soon, these price rises will deliver an extra 6 per cent CPI inflation, ensuring the RBA has to drive interest rates higher than many households can bear.

And for what? The gas cartel will not invest anymore. There’ll be no jobs created. Governments will receive no tax dividend owing to broken laws and the massive writedowns on the projects.

Indeed, this episode will be recounted by economic historians as the worst case of the “resources curse” ever. (It’s sometimes called Dutch Disease after the Netherlands’ broader economy suffered in the ’70s with the development of North Sea oil resources that lifted its currency and falling competitiveness hollowed out the industry.)

If Dutch Disease is a national cold, then Australian Disease is like an inoperable brain tumour. It has allowed miners to steal the resource, pay no tax, force scarcity pricing on the extractive nation, and raise the currency. All of which have already decimated industry, hobbled national income, and will soon begin to deflate household wealth as well.

how to fix it

The new Labor Government has been forced to confront this reality to some extent. Untenable energy prices have triggered a review of the Turnbull domestic reservation mechanism. This is all to the good, but what should it look like?

First, the reformed ADGSM must include a price trigger. As it stands, it is a volume measure that is too unwieldy to be effective. The ADGSM should automatically divert gas from export the moment the price goes over $7Gj. This is plenty high enough for the gas cartel to make money out of it. The reserves are quite cheap and since they’ve written off so much investment, the gas has become even cheaper on a cash basis.

The new ADGSM should apply to all three conglomerates. Although it is the Santos-led GLNG that has come to be most short of gas and openly lied about it, all three joint ventures knew what they were doing when they overinvested to leave Australia short of gas. Besides, as Bass Strait gas bleeds out, the shortage will only get worse and the future will require as much as 15 per cent of the gas currently exported to remain at home. That’s a burden best shared by all three projects.

A second option is to use export levies. If we set a baseline for profits at pre-Ukraine war prices around $7Gj, then levy the gas cartel for every export dollar above that price, then the local price of gas would collapse and Australians collect the war windfall instead of firms that have no right to it.

Third, we could install a super-profits tax on the cartel and recycle that revenue as energy subsidies for everybody else. That is a pretty clunky solution but it delivers the same end.

With any and all of these solutions, the cartel will scream “sovereign risk”. But so what? It was its mistakes that created this untenable situation. Australians should not have to pay for them.

Moreover, export gas contracts are renegotiated all the time. Just a few weeks ago, one member of the gas cartel, Shell, declared force majeur (that is undelivered but contracted gas) over something as trivial as a maritime labor dispute.

The larger truth is that the cartel is a risk to the sovereign and everyone within it.

Read related topics:Cost Of Living

.

Categories
Business

China mocks Scott Morrison, Australia’s ‘arrogance’ after ACCC gas report

China has branded Australia “laughable”, mocking the Government and former prime minister Scott Morrison in the wake of a “damning” gas report.

The comments were made as part of a scornful article published by the CCP-controlled Global Times.

The piece mocks a suggestion that Australia could step in and help with supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to European allies impacted by the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

At the start of 2022, the then-prime minister Mr Morrison said his government was looking at options that would allow Australia to fill international demand for gas if Russia stops exporting to Europe.

“Awkwardly, some in Australia are now warning of a potential shortage in the country and urging to set aside gas for Australia’s own electricity network before selling to the rest of the world,” the Global Times article noted.

Stream more finance news live & on demand with Flash. 25+ news channels in 1 place. New to Flash? Try 1 month free. Offer ends October 31, 2022 >

On Monday, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) gas inquiry 2017-2025 interim report warned businesses could shut down and there could be a record shortage of gas in the southern states next year unless something is done about the nation’s energy crisis.

The ACCC predicted a 56 petajoule shortfall in east coast gas supply by 2023, a figure it called a “significant risk to energy security” that was equivalent to 10 per cent of expected domestic demand.

China said the situation currently facing Australia was both “laughable and serious”.

“Laughable, because this reflects Australian officials’ overconfidence and arrogance in making empty promises it cannot deliver; serious, because a potential move could significantly affect already disrupted global energy supplies, given that Australia is known as one of the world’s top LNG exporters,” the newspaper noted.

Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine has seen international demand for LNG soar, with Beijing claiming a decision from Australia to impose export restrictions could “hurt some of its European and Asian allies the most”.

The article blasted Mr Morrison for his “empty promises” for saying Australia will help its allies when they are in need.

“It is clear that a possible reduction in Australia’s LNG exports would further exacerbate the global energy crisis and push up prices, while increasing the energy anxiety in countries that used to see Australia as a reliable source of supplies,” the Global Times said.

“Some of its allies may also be annoyed by Australia’s inability to actually offer help in areas where it apparently has an advantage.”

The article noted that China has recently made efforts to diversify its energy imports following recent tensions with Australia, with Beijing last year signing new LNG contracts with the US instead.

However, the outlet assured readers that any decision by Australia would not “fundamentally undermine” China’s energy security.

Government reacts to ‘damning’ gas report

Australia’s Resources Minister Madeleine King branded the new ACCC report as “damning” of gas exporters after it found they were not engaging locally “in the spirit” of the heads of agreement.

“We remain concerned that some (liquefied) natural gas LNG exporters are not engaging with the domestic market in the spirit in which the heads of agreement was signed,” the report said.

“LNG producers will need to divert a significant proportion of their excess gas into the domestic market.”

Ms King said gas producers “know” the report is “damning for them”.

“The ACCC report is damning, no doubt about it,” she said.

“It sets out patterns and instances of behavior that are clearly not acceptable in an environment where we do have an international and domestic energy supply crisis.”

The ACCC described the outlook for 2023 as “very concerning” with gas prices likely to increase.

“The outlook for 2023 is very concerning and is likely to place further upward pressure on prices, which could result in some commercial and industry users no longer being able to operate,” the report said.

“It could also lead to demand having to be curtailed.”

This shortfall will mainly affect NSW, Victoria, South Australia, the ACT and Tasmania, where “resources have been diminishing for some time”, though Queensland may also be impacted.

– with NCA NewsWire

.