jury – Michmutters
Categories
Sports

First responders circulating photographs of Gianna and Kobe Bryant’s bodies ‘poured salt in an open wound’, lawyer says

Vanessa Bryant’s lawyer says first responders “poured salt in an open wound and rubbed it in” by photographing and sharing photos of her husband and daughter’s bodies.

The widow of basketballer Kobe Bryant is suing the LA County sheriff’s department over an invasion of privacy, saying she fears that she or her surviving children could be exposed to the pictures.

The decorated NBA player, his 13-year-old daughter Gianna and seven other people died in a horrific helicopter crash in January 2020 while traveling to a basketball tournament.

Here’s a recap of what’s happened so far.

Why is Vanessa Bryant suing?

Ms Bryant filed the lawsuit over photographs, taken by first responders on their mobile phones, of the crash site including her husband and daughter’s bodies after they died.

She alleges the pictures were circulated among firefighters and off-duty colleagues, and that one deputy showed them to people at a bar.

Kobe Bryant with his family and wife at a basketball game in Los Angeles.
US federal safety officials blamed pilot error for the crash that killed nine people en route to as basketball tournament.(AP)

The lawsuit filed by Ms Bryant says she “feels ill at the thought that sheriff’s deputies, firefighters, and members of the public have gawked at gratuitous images of her deceased husband and child.”

“She lives in fear that she or her children will one day confront horrific images of their loved ones online,” the lawsuit says.

Ms Bryant is seeking undisclosed damage.

What happened in court?

Ms Bryant’s lawyer, Luis Li, told the jury that the photographs taken at the crash site by a deputy and a fire captain had no official or investigative purpose, and that they were viewed “for a laugh.”

The jury was shown CCTV footage of an off-duty sheriff’s deputy drinking at a bar showing the photos to a bartender, and alleged that the photos had been shown around as many as 30 people.

“They were shared repeatedly with people who had absolutely no reason to receive them,” Mr Li told the court.

gianna and kobe bryant smile arm in arm courtside at a basketball game
Kobe Bryant told the LA Times before his death that his daughter Gianna was “something else” on the basketball court.(Getty: Ethan Miller)

“They [the county] poured salt in an open wound and rubbed it in.”

A lawyer for the county defended the taking of the photos as an “essential” tool for first-responders and said that showing the bartender was “a moment of weakness.”

The defense lawyers told jurors that the fact that the pictures have not gone public showed that leaders in the sheriff’s and fire department did their jobs.

“They’re not online. They’re not in the media. They’ve never even been seen by the plaintiffs themselves,” she said.

“That is not an accident. That is a function of how diligent they were.”

A short, smiling woman in a red dress stands next to a tall bald man in a suit in front of a red Oscars photo background.
Vanessa Bryant was visibly emotional during the first hearing.(AP: Richard Shotwell)

But Mr Li said there’s no guarantee that the photos won’t be leaked in the future.

He said Ms Bryant “will be haunted by what they did forever”, and fears that her surviving children may see them.

What’s next?

The trial is expected to run for more than a week.

Another plaintiff in the case is Chris Chester, whose wife Sara and daughter Payton were also killed in the crash.

Los Angeles County officials have previously argued that Ms Bryant’s “severe and emotional and mental injuries” were caused by the crash, not the pictures, and dismissed the case as a “money grab.”

The county already agreed to pay $US2.5 million to settle a similar case brought by two families of victims of the crash.

Ms Bryant and Mr Chester declined to settle as part of that case.

ABC/wires

.

Categories
Australia

Jury discharged after nearly a week of deliberations in Brendan Pallant murder trial

A Supreme Court jury in the trial of a Melbourne man accused of killing his new girlfriend’s toddler has been unable to come to a verdict.

WARNING: This story contains graphic content.

Brendan Pallant was on trial for the murder of two-year-old Jaidyn Gomes-Sebastiao in September 2019.

After nearly a week of deliberations the jurors told the court they were unable to agree unanimously on whether Mr Pallant was guilty or not guilty of the charge.

The toddler died of a brain injury which the prosecution alleged was inflicted by Mr Pallant using a 4.6kg coffee table.

“Sometime that afternoon it’s alleged that Mr Pallant, during a short but profound period of frustration, anger, impatience, and loss of self-control, entered the boy’s bedroom and seriously assaulted two-year-old Jaidyn Gomes-Sebastiao,” Mark Gibson QC said.

Defense lawyers shift blame to mother

Mr Pallant’s lawyers, however, argued the injury could have been caused by another person, including Jaidyn’s mother, Stacie Saggers.

“The evidence is equally consistent with someone, Stacie, pushing or throwing Jaidyn into it,” Rishi Nathwani said.

Jaidyn had been left napping in the care of Mr Pallant while his mother went to work at a cleaning job.

Not long after she arrived home, having had some food and a sleep, Mr Pallant had suggested waking the boy, the court heard.

It was then, the defense said, Mr Pallant found Jaidyn injured in his bedroom.

“Brendan Pallant gave Jaidyn CPR, mouth-to-mouth, and during that he vomited,” Mr Nathwani told the trial.

“Is that consistent with someone wanting to kill?”

During a month-long trial the court heard Jaidyn had been left in his bedroom napping in the care of his mother’s new boyfriend, Mr Pallant, on the day he died.

A photo of a toddle with blonde hair and blue eyes looking into the camera.
The court heard two-year-old Jaidyn Gomes-Sebastiao was in the care of Brendan Pallant on the day of his death.(Supplied)

Ms Saggers had met Mr Pallant just a month earlier, allowing him to move into her Langwarrin home days later.

The court heard the pair did drugs at the home and had taken some the night before Jaidyn’s death.

“[Ms Saggers] sold her son’s bed for drugs,” Mr Nathwani told the jury.

“There was methamphetamine and amphetamine in her son’s body, both in urine and in his hair.”

The crown prosecutor said despite the environment, Ms Saggers kept her home tidy and her children fed and clean.

“Sure, she was not a perfect mother, perhaps not even a good mother at times, but she was never, ever violent or physically aggressive,” Mr Gibson said.

He told the court Ms Saggers had started to notice signs Jaidyn was being injured shortly after Mr Pallant moved in, even taking photos of new bruises to monitor her suspicions.

Judge declares no verdict will be reached

Supreme Court Justice Jane Dixon discharged the jury on its sixth day of deliberations.

“Murder is a charge that requires a unanimous verdict,” Justice Dixon said.

“You’ve indicated that, despite all of that, you’ve not been able to reach a unanimous verdict.

“It’s not likely you ever will.

“This sometimes happens.”

Justice Dixon thanked the jury for its work during the month-long trial and its subsequent attempt at coming to a decision.

“You have not seen your family and friends since probably last Thursday, you’ve been cut off from communications with the world,” she said.

“You went through the Melbourne lockdowns, and you’ve been locked down again.

“On behalf of the community, you have been extraordinary, you have made such great sacrifices.”

Mr Pallant has been remanded in custody.

The case will return to court for a hearing next month to decide what happens next.

.