hearing – Michmutters
Categories
Technology

Experimental Earbuds Can Detect Ear Infections With a Chirp

A picture of the galaxy buds pro worn in ear

photo: Gizmodo

Do you remember how your parents tried to convince you to eat your vegetables as a kid by promising they were good for your health? That’s the same tactic a lot of wearable makers are using today, by adding health-tracking features to devices like smartwatches. Now, researchers have developed a way for earbuds to track your ear health, too.

Every time Apple holds an event, it spends a few minutes touting the health benefits of wearing an Apple Watch, which has heart rate tracking features that can potentially identify heart problems before they become a serious complication. Yot’s also rumored that the long overdue update to Apple’s AirPods Pro wireless earbuds will potentially include body temperature measuringallowing the devices to detect a fever: an early symptom of countless other conditions.

It turns out the inherent capabilities of earbuds—namely blasting sound into your ears—also allows them to potentially detect conditions that can afflict the inner ear and the ear canal, as researchers from the University of Buffalo have found with an experimental device they’ve called EarHealth.

A diagram of the EarHealth system

What’s most interesting about EarHealth is that it relies on earbuds that more or less feature off-the-shelf hardware, although with an upgraded microphone inside designed to pick up sounds in the ear, not around the wearer. Based on shared images of the prototype, the EarHealth doesn’t even appear to rely on wireless earbuds, although an official release on the research on the University of Buffalo website does specifically mention the use of Bluetooth earbuds—which is good, because none of us want to go back to wires.

whereas the Apple Watch uses optical detection tricks to monitor heart health, the EarHealth uses sound instead. The earbuds emit a quick chirp which reverberates through the ear canal, producing unique sounds and echoes which are captured by the microphone. The captured sounds are then processed by a custom app on a connected smartphone that relies on a deep learning algorithm to generate a profile of the user’s inner ear geometry.

The first chirp is done while the user is healthy to generate a baseline profile of their inner ear, while later chirps, which can be regularly scheduled, generate profiles that are compared against the original to spot differences. estos can be used to diagnose one of three different conditions: earwax blockage, ruptured ear drums, and otitis media, which is a common infection or inflammation of the middle ear caused by colds or sore throats.

In tests done with 92 users that included 27 healthy subjects, 22 with ruptured eardrums, 25 with a confirmed case of otitis media, and 18 with earwax causing a blockage, the EarHealth had a diagnosis accuracy of 82.6%, but that can potentially be improved as the researchers refine both the hardware and the sample base of users. The benefit to using AI-powered algorithms is that they will continue to improve and become more accurate at making diagnoses over time as more sample data is made available.

.

Categories
Australia

Managers of St Basil’s Aged Care Home compelled to give evidence at coronial inquest

The managers of a Melbourne aged care home where 50 people died in a COVID-19 outbreak will be compelled to give evidence at a coronial inquiry.

Kon Kontis and Vicky Kos were in charge of the St Basil’s Aged Care Home in Fawkner when the virus swept through the facility in July and August 2020.

They were initially called to give evidence at a coronial inquest last year but refused on the grounds they might incriminate themselves.

State Coroner John Cain then made a ruling compelling them to appear, but Mr Kontis and Ms Kos took the matter to the Supreme Court.

Today Justice Stephen O’Meara ruled against the pair, finding the coroner had acted lawfully.

A blue and white sign that reads 'St Basils Victoria' in front of a building
A COVID outbreak claimed the lives of 50 residents of the St Basil’s aged care facility.(ABC News: Danielle Bonica )

Klery Loutas, who lost her 77-year-old mother Filia Xynidakis in the disaster, has welcomed the decision.

“They [Mr Kontis and Ms Kos] have got vital pieces of the puzzle that they need to share with us so we know exactly what happened, how it happened, so governments and legislators can take action so that it doesn’t happen again,” Ms Loutas said.

Ms Loutas said the delay caused by the Supreme Court action had been difficult for families.

“We’ve all been very anxious, we all want to get through this and survive the stress and the torment and the anguish and the trauma we have faced having gone through this and the process being delayed, it just adds stress to our lives, she said.

“We’ve buried our loved ones, but we haven’t laid them to rest and until we find out exactly what happened to them and why it happened none of us will be at peace, none of us will ever be at ease or start to properly mourn and grieve.”

The inquest last year heard care for residents dropped off dramatically when the virus took hold in mid-July 2020.

After Victoria’s Chief Health Officer ruled that all staff had to be considered close contacts, the federal government struggled to find a replacement workforce.

The inquest heard residents were left malnourished and dehydrated and within six weeks, 50 had died.

The inquest was added while Mr Kontis and Ms Kos’ battle to stay silent continued.

It is unclear when the hearing will resume.

St Basil’s operators facing charges

Today’s Supreme Court decision comes as the operators of the nursing home also appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court where they are accused of breaching the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

A sign on the fence outside St Basil's Homes for the Aged has olive branches and blue and white ribbons tied to its sides.
WorkSafe alleges the nursing home operator did not make sure workers wore protective equipment.(ABC News: Joseph Dunstan)

St Basil’s is facing nine charges which include failing to provide and maintain a safe working environment, failing to provide information and supervision, and failing to make sure that people other than staff members were not exposed to health and safety risks.

WorkSafe investigators allege the nursing home operator did not make sure workers wore protective equipment and did not train workers in how to use it.

They also allege St Basil’s failed to tell workers when protective equipment should be used, failed to supervise them using the equipment or verify that they were able to competently don and doff the gear.

If convicted, the nursing home provider is facing ends of just under $1.49 million.

St Basil’s will return to court in December for an administrative hearing.

.