d
the price is getting out of hand, it is disgustingly expensive. I don’t get it.
Kev, 1 hour agoGood audio can’t exactly be quantified lol We’ll see when reviewers actually get them.Yeah, you might be in a bit of a pickle, as there are quite a few good reviewers for audio products on tech sites.
Usually you get 90% of the review describing the app, mics, ANC and tiny paragraph that says “They sound good.”
Good luck with reviews, I really hope you will find at least one good, real review for these headphones.
s
- samwithgalaxy
- t@J
Don’t they feature the co-axial design as their predecessor?
Kev, 1 hour agoUnlike phones, you guys can’t judge this based on the specs. I’m excited to try this… moreHaving Buds Pro, I don’t really see the point of upgrading, except for the matte finish, which I wanted since the start since I avoid anything glossy. Batterly life is the same too, the mic were already good but the ANC wasnt on par with the Sony XM4 (Which have a slightly inferior mic for conversation / phone call, other users prefer the sound/captation of the Buds Pro over the Sony) , perhaps this will be interesting ? Doubt it, it’s a release to milk money and they’ll be priced at 150 in 5-7 months (Or less with cashback in December) and 120-130 in a year. So yeah, I’ll wait and let other enjoy the beta stage 😎
?
What happened to the glossy design, was it a fingerprint magnet?
K
Dylan Mason, 2 hours ago“Clearer and richer audio” jesus murphy, clichés much? That’s not what 24-bit a… moreGood audio can’t exactly be quantified lol
We’ll see when reviewers actually get them.
K
Unlike phones, you guys can’t judge this based on the specs. I’m excited to try this, although I am concerned that they only claim a 3 dB increase in ANC.
Samsung’s buds have all sounded very well in the past. So these Pro 2s have big shoes to fill. And I am confident that these will sound great.
M
Wait doesn’t this look almost identical to the samsung galaxy buds 2
Bogdaan, 3 hours ago1. Another proprietary audio codec and AAC only – no buy 2. No dual connection – no buy. My R… moreit has sbc,aac, samsung scalable hd and le audio will be added but yeah that samsung codec i dont have on my pc but i do have aptx on pc.
Anonymous, 5 hours agoWhich design fits you better? Airpods 1 design? Galaxy Buds+ design was top and the oval shape of the case, even better in the hand 🌞
Still use them for Audio on PC, because for music the quality isn’t the best (especially vs Buds Pro / Sony XM4)
?
- anonymous
- kx7
230$ just for standard tws? nope better buy gaming tws not this crap
D
“Clearer and richer audio” jesus murphy, clichés much? That’s not what 24-bit audio does at all. It’s an increased dynamic range over standard 16-bit audio. That’s all it is. Unless you have lossless 24-bit files stored on your phone or a streaming platform supporting such, this will not impact your regular day-to-day use at all. It also means nothing unless they’re pairing a new lossless codec with it, otherwise it’s just another lossy LDAC clone with HALF the bandwidth capabilities that a standard 24-bit/44.1kHz file requires.
They have a 10mm woofer and 5.4mm tweeter. Not a single 10mm driver. “360 degree audio” is also just a surround DSP, and it doesn’t actually add anything beneficial.
Come on guys, do more than preach the marketing material to us. Por favor? Or at least do THAT right.
B.
Ivo., 3 hours ago24 bit or not, until Samsung can make the buds to sound at least as good as the best buds, Bos… moreYou seriously think Bose sounds better than Samsung🤣🤣. Do you even know what is sound quality?
P
I wish the case would be smaller
?
- anonymous
- JuH
Anonymous, 5 hours agoMeh in ear canal buds again, interest is lost. More companies should start focusing on peo… moreBut there are other options. It just doesn’t need to be samasung
Yo
24 bit or not, until Samsung can make the buds to sound at least as good as the best buds, Bose, I am not buying them! Sound quality is all that matters, and nothing else!
B.
1. Another proprietary audio codec and AAC only – do not buy
2. No dual connection – no buy. My Redmi Buds 3 Pro for $45 has it
3. Bluetooth LE is coming next year – no reason to buy now.
Clear conclusion for me unless you have no buds atm
AND
Bluetooth 5.3 and no support for the LC3 codec? Is it a typo in the marketing material or it doesn’t support at all?
I can almost bet EarFun Free Pro 2 for $80 will sound much better than this (not to mention $30 wired headphones).
TWS … I wonder if more manufacturers will start manufacturing headphones that can be classified as headphones and not just noise makers with abysmal tuning.