Categories
Technology

Fitbit’s ending support for PC music file transfers

If you’re the owner of a Fitbit Versa, Versa 2, or Ionic, you’ll soon no longer be able to transfer music from your computer to your Fitbit device. In a support page spotted by 9to5GoogleFitbit says it’s discontinuing its Fitbit Connect app, leaving you with only two ways to download music to your device: a paid subscription to either Pandora or Deezer.

Fitbit Connect is a companion app for Mac and Windows computers that lets you sync fitness data between devices and transfer music to legacy Fitbit devices. Fitbit has slowly been phasing out the software in favor of its mobile app, as it no longer recommends that users download it on its setup page.

But without access to Connect, there’s no way to download music to your Fitbit without a paid subscription to either Pandora or Deezer. On its support page, Fitbit says “you may be eligible for a 90-day trial” of either service, which will run you $9.99 / month for Deezer Premium or $4.99 / month for Pandora Plus once the trial’s over.

This change doesn’t affect newer Fitbit models, however, as they don’t come with the option to transfer files between your PC and Fitbit device (devices like the Versa 3 and Sense already only let you download music through Deezer or Pandora). If you own an older Fitbit that has the ability to store music, you’ll still get access to the music files you have on your Fitbit device right now — you just won’t be able to download any additional songs without Pandora or Deezer past the October deadline.

Many users use their Fitbit devices to control the music they’re playing on their smartphone, whether they’re streaming music through Spotify or listening to songs already downloaded on their phone. But still, having access to local music files can come in handy if you’re listening to music offline or want to use your Fitbit without your smartphone.

While Fitbit doesn’t explain why it’s getting rid of Fitbit Connect, it’s possible that there just isn’t enough demand to keep the service up and running. Google (Fitbit’s parent company) didn’t immediately respond to TheVerge‘s request for comment.

Categories
Entertainment

I was worried I was doing my 20s ‘wrong’

One Sunday morning recently — stretched out like a croissant on the grass of Carlton Gardens — a friend said to me, “I’m 29 years old and I’ve never been to the club or worn a tiny top!”

I’m also 29, and although my friend and I both google things like “Phoebe Waller-Bridge how old when” routinely, our twenties have unfolded in markedly different ways.

I’ve spent many a night peeling my shoes off the floor of the proverbial club, and I’ve worn plenty a tiny top, but I still don’t understand how money works, and I’ve only just started my “career” .

“I’m 29 years old and I still don’t understand what the jobs are,” I replied, and as these words left my mouth I realized we were saying exactly the same thing: I have a sneaking suspicion I’ve done it all wrong.

.

Categories
Sports

St Kilda legend Nick Riewoldt on Ben McEvoy trade, Hawthorn Hawks, 250th game against Gold Coast Suns

St Kilda legend Nick Riewoldt has described his former club’s decision to trade away Ben McEvoy to Hawthorn as “mind-boggling.”

McEvoy, who played his 250th AFL game in Saturday’s win over Gold Coast, was dealt to the Hawks at the end of 2013 and has been an invaluable addition, winning two premierships and getting appointed captain in 2021.

Speaking on Fox Footy’s Best on GroundRiewoldt, who was Saints skipper at the time of the trade — which saw the club acquire Shane Savage and a first-round pick (Luke Dunstan) — says McEvoy was pushed out.

Watch every blockbuster AFL match this weekend Live & Ad-Break Free In-Play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Start your free trial now >

Suns succumb to Hawks hot streak | 02:07

“He didn’t leave, the club traded him. At the time it felt like the people in charge making those decisions were saying, ‘look how clever we are. Let’s trade this bloke and this bloke and we’ll get in some picks, we’ll show how clever we are with recruiting’,” Riewoldt said.

“You’ve got to get your picks right, and they didn’t… it was mind boggling, and still is.

“He’s been a superstar and it was still at St Kilda — a bit of a void of leadership is the criticism at times — he would’ve been perfect.

“But good luck to him, he’s gone on to great things.”

McEvoy was carried off after his milestone match and embraced by Hawks fans and teammates with his kids on the ground in great scenes.

Fellow Saints great Leigh Montagna also praised his former teammate post-game — a match that ended in the tough ruckman’s head bandaged after a knock.

McEvoy carried off after his 250th match (Photo by Steve Bell/Getty Images)Source: FOX SPORTS

“Congratulations to Benny McEvoy, big contested mark in that last minute, the headband, he’s everything we’ve seen from him over 250 games,” he said on Fox Footy.

Hawks star Jack Gunston said of McEvoy: “You always love a good that you want to follow, and Ben is that guy. Headband today, of course he did. He’s just such a genuine good block, but such a competitor as well.

“It’s not an easy gig playing in the ruck I wouldn’t have thought, he’s just a good fella and I’m glad we got the win for him.”

McEvoy gave a shout out post-match to Dylan Moore playing in his 50th match in true selfless McEvoy style.

“It wasn’t pretty today, but sometimes you’ve got to win ugly. So pleased to get a result in mine and Moorey’s 300th.”

.

Categories
Australia

George Christensen and the AFP’s three-year fight to keep a letter secret

When Australian Federal Police commissioner Reece Kershaw took over the agency, he promised a new era of transparency.

“If it’s going to get out, we might as well be the ones actually saying it,” he told The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age in late 2019, referring to the increasingly long delays to access documents under freedom of information laws.

George Christensen spent 294 days in the Philippines over a four-year period.

George Christensen spent 294 days in the Philippines over a four-year period.Credit:Andrew Mears

Back then, the AFP was mired in controversy over raids on multiple media outlets and the nation’s new top law enforcer was keen to project a transparency-trumps-all approach.

But what Kershaw might not have been aware of at the time was this: his agency had already begun what would turn into a more than three-year legal fight to block the release of a single-page document.

Five months earlier, Nine News and this masthead had applied to obtain a letter the AFP sent then-home affairs minister Peter Dutton regarding Nationals MP George Christensen’s activities in the Philippines. When Kershaw made his promise to him, the AFP had already issued its first rejection.

The AFP firstly opposed the release of the letter on privacy grounds, arguing it would be an unreasonable disclosure of Christensen’s personal information.

After the matter was appealed to the information commissioner, the AFP added more arguments on national security grounds. The police agency contended that releasing the letter would have a “substantial adverse effect” on its operations by compromising the “provision of frank and candid briefings to the minister of home affairs in relation to sensitive matters”.

The matter was further delayed by Christensen making three separate submissions arguing against the letter’s disclosure.

The long-running fight to obtain the document ended this week, when the AFP was forced to release the document after a ruling by the information commissioner found its disclosure was in the public interest.

In the letter sent to the then-home affairs minister Peter Dutton on June 25, 2018, the AFP said a police probe into Christensen’s frequent travel to the region had found no evidence of criminal conduct but the politician had “engaged in activities” that put him at risk of being compromised by foreign interests.

loading

The stonewalling by the AFP has opened itself up to accusations that it was trying to serve the then-Coalition government, rather than acting as the cops on the beat.

Sydney barrister Geoffrey Watson, SC, a former counsel assisting the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption, says: “I can’t impute bad or political motives to the AFP, but that’s the practical effect of what they did.”

Watson says the three-year delay to release the letter is “scandalous” and “appalling” because now there is a new Labor government and Christensen is out of federal parliament.

He says he understands the AFP’s privacy arguments, even if they were outweighed by the public interest, but the agency’s national security arguments were “specious” and “baseless”.

“I found it laughable to think that it could have some effect on AFP operations.”

Asked why it fought the request for the document for so long, the AFP says it “respects the decision of the Information Commission and has released the document to the applicant”.

Christensen, who was privately dubbed the “Member for Manila” by colleagues, took at least 28 trips to the Philippines, spending almost 300 days in the country, between 2014 and 2018.

He would wander the streets of Angeles City – an urbanized area more than 80km from the capital Manila known for its red light district – in a Hawaiian-style shirt, board shorts and thongs, buying giant teddy bears and chocolates for women in the bars.

One of his favorite bars was Ponytails, which advertised itself as an “adult entertainment service” employing 100 female dancers and 50 female wait staff.

According to Marjorie Lamsen, the manager of the Ponytails, Christensen was a “very regular visitor” at the venue.

“He was always very good… He was a big spender,” Lamsen said in late 2019.

“The weakness of George is women. He would usually give allowances to these people … He would keep his job from him a secret but now we know he’s a politician.

It is here he would meet his wife, April, in early 2017. He would tell Queensland’s Courier Mail that a friend had introduced them at a “small karaoke” bar and his “singing talents obviously impressed her”.

Christensen has long denied any wrongdoing in relation to his activity in South East Asia, pointing to the fact that federal police never found any evidence of criminality.

He has previously claimed he spent so much time in the country to be with his now wife, but he made 19 trips – totaling 205 days – in the country before he ever met her.

loading

Alarm bells started ringing for federal police officers in early 2017, when Christensen’s regular trips to the Philippines and Thailand started catching their attention.

The AFP then became aware of multiple aliases Facebook pages Christensen appeared to be using to communicate with people in the Philippines. Officers were also concerned about payments Christensen was making to women in the country.

Christensen went to great lengths to normalize his trips. He would often fly straight to Manila from Canberra at the end of sitting weeks. He was, after all, chairman of the Parliamentary Friends of the Philippines. He would tell colleagues he visited regularly to do charity work for orphanages.

The Queenslander would holiday there over Christmas and New Year only to fly home and be seen in the electorate on Australia Day, or Anzac Day – post an image on Facebook before flying back.

On September 7, then-AFP commissioner Andrew Colvin briefed the country’s most senior bureaucrat, Martin Parkinson, the secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, on the matter. Parkinson advised Colvin he should brief then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, who was subsequently provided six briefings over the course of the next year.

Colvin told Turnbull that the Philippines police were aware of the concerns and that this raised the possibility Christensen could be questioned in Manila on an upcoming trip.

“Colvin described how Christensen had an unusually complex online presence and had been spending substantial sums in Manila bars and nightclubs as well as making many small payments to women there,” Turnbull writes in his memoir, A Bigger Picture.

“Against the advice of our embassy in the Philippines, he had been staying in seedy hotels in Angeles City, which was not only recklessly unsafe but made him vulnerable to being compromised.”

Over the coming months, then-deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce, his successor Michael McCormack and Dutton were also all provided briefings on the police probe.

At some point during this time, there was a growing concern by some people within the government and the AFP that Christensen had been tipped off about the police probe.

Watson says if this did occur, it would be “disgraceful conduct” on behalf of the politicians.

“They engaged in briefings and it seemed to have been leaked to Christensen,” Watson says. “If you can’t trust senior politicians not to leak this information for political advantage then the country is in a woeful place.”

On May 24, 2018, the AFP met with Christensen and told him of their concerns that he could be compromised, including by foreign intelligence services. A month later, they sent the letter to Dutton, Turnbull and McCormack closing the case but warning of the ongoing risk.

Watson says it appeared the AFP were pursuing two different avenues: the allegation of criminal conduct, which was found to have no basis, and the national security concerns of Christensen being potentially compromised.

“Having investigated the criminal aspect and found nothing… I cannot understand why it wouldn’t be escalated if there was a risk, or why it wasn’t transferred to [counter-espionage agency] ASIO or why it just seemed to fall away to nothing.”

He also points out the AFP later raised national security grounds in the FOI process, despite dropping the inquiry into security concerns.

“The AFP was raising national security in relation to a matter they appeared not to pursue. How does that work out?

loading

Anthony Whealy, QC, chair of the Center for Public Integrity and a former Court of Appeal judge, says national security is an important concern but too often it is thrown up as a “cloak to avoid a situation”.

“This example of the AFP letter is a classic example of a completely artificial claim for national security protection,” he says.

Categories
US

Indiana adopts restrictive abortion law, prompting economic fallout

Comment

Indiana’s new sweeping ban on abortion produced immediate political and economic fallout Saturday, as some of the state’s biggest employers objected to the restrictions, Democratic leaders strategized ways to amend or repeal the law, and abortion rights activists made plans to arrange alternative locations for women seeking procedures.

The Indiana law, which the Republican-controlled state legislature passed late Friday night and Gov. Eric Holcomb (R) signed moments later, was the first state ban passed since the US Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade in June and was celebrated as a major victory by abortion foes.

On Aug. 5, Indiana lawmakers passed a near-total ban on abortion. The bill was signed into law by Gov. Eric Holcomb (R). (Video: Washington Post)

It also came just three days after voters in traditionally conservative Kansas surprised the political world by taking a very different tack, rejecting a ballot measure that would have stripped abortion rights protections from that state’s constitution.

The vote in Indiana capped weeks of fraught debate in Indianapolis, where activists demonstrated at the state Capitol and waged intense lobbying campaigns as Republican lawmakers debated how far the law should go in restricting abortion. Some abortion foes hailed the law’s passage as a road map for conservatives in other states pushing similar bans in the aftermath of the high court’s decision on gnawswhich had guaranteed for the past 50 years the right to abortion care.

The Indiana ban, which goes into effect Sept. 15, allows abortion only in cases of rape, incest, lethal fetal abnormality, or when the procedure is necessary to prevent severe health risks or death. Indiana joins nine other states that have abortion bans starting at conception.

The new law represents a victory for antiabortion forces, who have been working for decades to halt the procedure. But passage occurred after disagreements among some abortion foes, some of whom thought the bill did not go far enough in stopping the procedure.

After the legislation was signed into law, Eli Lilly, the pharmaceutical giant and one of the state’s largest employers, warned that such laws would hurt its employee recruiting efforts and said the company would look elsewhere for its expansion plans.

“We are concerned that this law will hinder Lilly’s — and Indiana’s — ability to attract diverse scientific engineering and business talent from around the world,” the company said in a statement issued Saturday. “Given this new law, we will be forced to plan for more employment growth outside our home state.”

See where abortion laws have changed

Salesforce, the tech giant with 2,300 employees in Indiana, had previously offered to relocate employees in states with abortion restrictions, though it didn’t respond on Saturday to a request for comment on the Indiana law.

The Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce also warned the ban was passed too quickly and without regard for how it will affect the state’s tourism industry.

“Such an expedited legislative process — rushing to advance state policy on broad, complex issues — is, at best, detrimental to Hoosiers, and at worst, reckless,” the chamber said in a statement, asking: “Will the Indy region continue to attract tourism and convention investments?”

Indiana lost out on 12 conventions and an estimated $60 million of business after it passed a religious freedom law in 2015, according to one local tourism industry estimate.

Indiana is the first state to ban abortion by legislature since the Supreme Court decision in June overturning Roe v. Wade. Other states enacted “trigger laws” that went into effect with the fall of Roe.

Indiana may be just the beginning. Abortion rights advocates estimate that abortion could be severely restricted or banned in as many as half of the 50 states.

An official at Indiana Right to Life, an Indiana anti-abortion group, said the new law will end 95 percent of abortions in Indiana and will close all Indiana abortion clinics” Sept. 15, the date the legislation takes effect, abortion activists go to court and get an injunction beforehand.

Indiana has considered abortion restrictions for years, though it remained a state where many in the region traveled for abortion care. Now, as many nearby states — including Ohio, Kentucky and West Virginia — also push for abortion bans, patients may have to travel hundreds of thousands in some cases for care, said Elizabeth Nash, a policy expert at the Guttmacher Institute, which supports abortion rights. “Patients in Ohio won’t be able to go to Indiana for access. They’ll have to get to, perhaps, Illinois or Michigan,” she said.

Passage of the Indiana measure occurred just weeks after national attention was focused on a 10-year-old girl who was raped in Ohio, where abortion is banned after six weeks, and traveled to Indiana to terminate the pregnancy.

Caitlin Bernard, the doctor who performed that abortion in Indianapolis, tweeted Saturday that she was “devastated” by the legislature’s action. “How many girls and women will be hurt before they realize this must be reversed? I will continue to fight for them with every fiber of my being,” she wrote.

Doctors are reluctant to work in anti-abortion states

The Indiana measure drew swift condemnation from national Democrats, who sought to cast Republicans as extreme on abortion — citing the Kansas vote earlier this week, where even rural, conservative parts of the state rejected changing the state’s constitutional right to an abortion.

The law is “another radical step by Republican legislators to take away women’s reproductive rights and freedom,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement.

Democrats are hopeful, though, that they can use what happened in Indiana to cast the entire Republican Party as extreme on abortion.

“This has nothing to do with being ‘pro-life,’ ” tweeted California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). “It’s about power and control.”

In Washington, Republican leaders have been largely silent on Republican-led states’ push to ban abortion. Polls consistently show that near-total abortion bans like the one in Indiana are unpopular with the general public.

So when Indiana Republicans ban abortion for an entire state, “they are effectively speaking for all Republicans,” said Martha McKenna, a Democratic political strategist, “and that’s why I have hope it’s a good issue for Democrats in November.”

Another political strategist, Jonathan Levy, who worked on the Kansans For Constitutional Freedom Campaign, which is opposed to limiting abortion rights, said the Kansas vote showed that extreme anti-abortion positions are “going to be rejected by Americans across the political spectrum. The American people want legislators to focus on how to keep food on the table, keep the economy afloat. They think the legislature’s priorities are out of whack,” he said.

Alongside the near-total abortion ban, Indiana Republicans also passed legislation they said was intended to support pregnant women and mothers, but critics pointed out much of the money was directed at propping up pregnancy crisis centers run by anti-abortion groups.

The passage of the bill left health providers and abortion counseling agencies struggling to figure out the full impact of the legislation.

Indiana University Health, a major health-care provider in the state, issued a statement saying it was trying to figure out what the ban meant for its doctors and patients.

“We will take the next few weeks to fully understand the terms of the new law and how to incorporate changes into our medical practice to protect our providers and care for people seeking reproductive health,” the health provider said in a statement.

Meantime, activists began discussing plans to raise funds and provide transportation for those seeking abortion access after the ban goes into effect, said Carol McCord, a former employee at Planned Parenthood.

“Since this is soon to be illegal in Indiana, we are looking for ways to help women travel to get services that they need,” she said. Indiana law was already considered restrictive compared with other states, so about 35 percent of women seeking abortions traveled out of state already, said Jessica Marchbank who serves as the state programs manager for the All-Options Pregnancy Resource Center in Bloomington.

Democratic state legislators began strategizing Saturday about how to respond, including considering repeal measures and organizing voters to elect legislators who favor abortion rights.

“This is a dark time for Indiana,” said state Sen. Shelli Yoder, an assistant Democratic caucus chair. “The plan going forward is to be sure we come out in November and vote out the individuals who supported something that only a tiny minority of Hoosiers wanted.”

Immediately, Yoder said in an interview that she and like-minded state legislators are contemplating action that could undo the impact of the new law, noting that the legislature has not been formally adjourned.

“We can come back and fix this,” she said, adding that legislators are at the early stage of plotting how to do that.

Katie Blair, the advocacy and public policy director of the American Civil Liberties Union in Indiana, said Saturday that her organization will examine legal action.

“You can guarantee that our legal team will be working with partners to evaluate every legal avenue available to defend abortion access here in Indiana,” Blair said in a statement.

In signing the legislation, Holcomb applauded the work of the lawmakers he had called into a special session this summer to find a way to restrict abortion, acknowledging disagreements among those opposed to abortion.

“These actions followed long days of hearings filled with sobering and personal testimony from citizens and elected representatives on this emotional and complex topic,” the governor said in a statement. “Ultimately, those voices shaped and informed the final contents of the legislation and its carefully negotiated exceptions to address some of the unthinkable circumstances a woman or unborn child might face.”

Categories
Business

Volkswagen ID. Buzz price revealed in the UK, could top $100,000 in Australia

The electric Kombi reboot and its commercial van counterpart have been priced for the UK, giving Australian customers an idea of ​​how much it could cost if it arrives in local showrooms.


Price for the 2023 Volkswagen ID. Buzz has been announced for the UK, indicating a starting price in excess of $100,000 for the reborn electric Kombi if it comes to Australia.

Revealed in March 2022 as an electric reboot of Volkswagen’s iconic Type 2 Kombi van from the 1960s, the ID. Buzz people-mover and its ID. Buzz Cargo commercial offshoot are due to go on sale in the UK next month.

While Volkswagen Australia is yet to confirm whether either ID. Buzz variant will appear in local showrooms, it has previously expressed interest in the iconic vehicle.



In the UK, the back-to-basics delivery van version of the Volkswagen ID. Buzz Cargo starts from £38,125 ($AU66,400) for the Commerce model – about £19,000 ($AU33,000) less than the cheapest five-seater ID. Buzz.

It’s worth noting these prices exclude the 20 per cent Value Added Tax (VAT) which applies to the majority of purchases in the UK, similar to the 10 per cent Goods and Services Tax (GST) in Australia.

Including VAT, the ID. Buzz Cargo Commerce’s price is pushed to £45,750 ($AU79,600) before on-road costs are applied.



Standard equipment on the ID. Buzz Cargo Commerce includes 19-inch wheels, a 10-inch touchscreen, 5.3-inch digital dash, three front seats (with heated driver’s seat), front and rear parking sensors, multiple USB-C ports plus wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

Buyers who want more from their vans can purchase the Commerce Plus from £42,375 (AU$73,760) excluding VAT, with its taxed price starting from £50,850 ($AU88,500).

On top of the base Commerce grade, Commerce Plus gains radar cruise control, sensor-key entry, park assist plus, a rear view camera, multi-function ‘leatherette’ steering wheel, heated windscreen, Discover Pro navigation system, travel assist, lane assist, side assist and emergency assist.



In the people-mover line-up, the five-seater ID. Buzz Life is the least expensive of the three variants, starting from £57,115 ($AU99,400) plus on-road costs– about $6,000 more than a Tesla Model 3 Performance in Australia.

Stepping up to the ID. Buzz Style comes with added equipment such as matrix LED headlights and ambient interior lighting, incurring a £4,800 ($AU8,350) premium over the Life with a price of £61,915 ($AU107,750) plus on-road costs.

The limited ID. Buzz 1st Edition in the UK gains additional features such as 21-inch alloy wheels, a 12-inch infotainment screen and electric memory seats for an extra £1080 ($AU1880) on top of the Style grade, topping out the price list at £ 62,995 ($AU109,630) before on-road costs.



While the variant names are different in the UK, these prices are similar to those already seen in the ID. Buzz’s home country of Germany, where the entry-level Pro grade starts from €64,581.30 ($AU96,300) excluding electric vehicle incentives.

All variants in the Volkswagen ID. Buzz and Volkswagen ID. Buzz cargo range are powered by a single 150kW/310Nm electric motor which drives the rear wheels.

A 77kWh battery pack provides power to the electric motor, enabling claimed driving ranges of 421km for the ID. Buzz and 424km for the Cargo variant on a single charge.



The Volkswagen ID. Buzz is capable of being DC fast charged at up to 170kW, topping the battery up from five to 80 per cent in roughly 30 minutes.

Volkswagen Australia is yet to announce the complete rollout of its portfolio of electric cars.

However, if the Volkswagen ID. Buzz does come to Australia, it is expected to follow higher priority models such as the ID.4 SUV, ID.5 SUV and the ID.3 hatchback.

Jordan Mulach

Jordan Mulach is Canberra/Ngunnawal born, currently residing in Brisbane/Turrbal. Joining the Drive team in 2022, Jordan has previously worked for Auto Action, MotorsportM8, The Supercars Collective and TouringCarTimes, WhichCar, Wheels, Motor and Street Machine. Jordan is a self-described iRacing addict and can be found on weekends either behind the wheel of his Octavia RS or swearing at his ZH Fairlane.

Read more about Jordan Mulach LinkIcon

Categories
Entertainment

Hugh Jackman announces death of beloved French Bulldog Dali

Hugh Jackman’s beloved dog Dali has passed away.

On Sunday morning, the X Men shared actor emotional tribute to his French Bulldog Dali and revealed he died at the ripe old age of 11.

“It’s a very sad day for our family,” Jackman wrote. “He would’ve been 12 next month… which I’m told is a long life for this breed.”

READMORE: Freeze Frame: Why the ‘More Demi Moore’ cover was never meant to be seen by the public

Hugh Jackman and dog Dali
Hugh Jackman announced his 11-year-old dog Dali has passed away. (instagram)

READMORE: Nicola Peltz Beckham shares cryptic post amid feud rumors

“I always, always called him the ROCKSTAR. Because he was! He marched to the beat of his own drum, was beloved by the whole world, and boy did he have a good life.”

“We will miss him but know he’s howling in heaven, ruling the roost and enjoying the all you can eat buffet,” said the actor. “RIP Dali Rockstar Jackman. We love you!”

The touching obituary was accompanied by some adorable photos of Dali and Jackman cuddling up together.

READMORE: Khloe Kardashian and Tristan Thompson welcome baby boy via surrogate

Dali has been a big part of the Jackman family’s lives since his adoption in 2010.

The Greatest Showman actor often shared photos of them going on beach trips or walking on the mean streets of Manhattan.

Dali is survived by Jackman’s other dog, a poodle-terrier mix named Allegra.

For a daily dose of 9Honey, subscribe to our newsletter here.

Rita prays

Celebrities and their pets: Photos

Categories
Sports

Calf twinge forces Patrick Dangerfield out but the Geelong Cats get cream against St Kilda

Jeremy Cameron kicked the next goal immediately after half-time and the Saints were never a chance from that point on as their hearts sank and their supporters checked how Richmond were going as they hoped to cling to the eighth rung on the ladder.

St Kilda's Jack Steele tackles Mark O'Connor.

St Kilda’s Jack Steele tackles Mark O’Connor.Credit:Getty Images

Max Holmes was outstanding on the wing as Geelong rediscovered their ball movement, while their defense led by the precocious Sam De Koning – who defeated Max King – kept the Saints goalless for the third quarter. Jake Kolodjashnij was excellent in his 150th game, with Jack Henry playing forward while Rhys Stanley stamped himself as the No. 1 ruckman.

The run of eight unanswered goals ended when Higgins kicked a goal midway through the final quarter with the margin out to 58 points at that point. St Kilda’s disappointing performance was exacerbated by an ankle injury to veteran Dan Hannebery, who may have played the final game of his career.

The biggest headache for the Cats will be at selection with Dangerfield, Selwood, Gary Rohan and Mark Blicavs all on the sidelines, with Blicavs managed while Rohan was in the concussion protocols.

loading

Brandan Parfitt, in just his second game back from a hand injury, found form in the third quarter as the Cats look to get their best players playing at their best in September.

St Kilda are once again in a fight to finish in the finals, with Richmond taking their place in the top eight, the Saints battling Brisbane on Friday night while Richmond play Hawthorn.

GEELONG 6.4 8.5 12.7 17.8 (110)
ST KILDA 3.0 7.1 7.4 10.5 (65)

GOALS
Gelong: Smith 3, Hawkins 3, Cameron 2, Stengle 2, Guthrie, Henry, Duncan, Close, Holmes, Menegola, Tuohy.
St Kilda: Higgins 2, Membrey 2, King, Butler, Wood, Sinclair, Steele, Long.
BEST
Gelong: Holmes, Bews, Smith, DeKoning, Kolodjashnij, Close, Stanley.
St Kilda: Wilkie, Higgins, Steele, Crouch.
umpires Stevic, Broadbent, Heffernan.
VENUE GMHBA Stadium.

Categories
Australia

Two men killed after their ute runs off the road into a tree in late-night tragedy

Two people have died in a horror late-night crash in regional Victoria.

The crash took place in Berrybank, west of Melbourne, about 11pm on Friday.

Police say a ute ran off the road near the Hamilton Highway and Berrybank-Wallinduc Road intersection and crashed into a tree.

Watch the latest News on Channel 7 or stream for free on 7plus >>

Two men were in the car at the time and died at the scene.

Their ages were not disclosed immediately by police.

File: Two men have died after their car left the road and hit a tree in regional Victoria. Credit: AAP

“The exact circumstances surrounding the collision are yet to be determined and the investigation remains ongoing,” police said in a statement.

“Anyone who witnessed the crash, with information or dashcam footage is urged to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or submit a confidential report online at www.crimestoppersvic.com.au.”

The fatalities bring Victoria’s road toll to 143 this year, compared to 128 at the same time last year.

Man charged with murder over QLD mass shooting.

Man charged with murder over QLD mass shooting.

.

Categories
US

Democrats’ big climate, health care and tax package clears major Senate hurdle

WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Saturday to advance a sweeping climate and economic bill with the support of all 50 Democrats, bringing long-stalled elements of President Joe Biden’s agenda one step closer to reality.

The procedural vote on the filibuster-proof package was 51-50, with all Republicans opposing the motion to begin debate and Vice President Kamala Harris casting the tie-breaking vote. If that support holds, it is enough to pass the bill through the Senate and send it to the House in the coming days.

The legislation, called the Inflation Reduction Act, includes major spending to combat climate change and extend health care coverage, paid for with savings on prescription drugs and taxes on corporations. It puts hundreds of billions of dollars toward deficit reduction.

“This is one of the most comprehensive and impactful bills Congress has seen in decades,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., said on the floor before the vote.

“It’s going to mean a lot for the families and the people of our country,” Harris told NBC News as she arrived to break the 50-50 tie.

The procedural vote, during a rare weekend session, kicks off several hours of debate, followed by a “vote-a-rama” — a process in which senators can offer virtually unlimited amendments that require a simple majority of votes to adopt.

The legislation isn’t subject to the filibuster — it is being pursued through a special process called reconciliation, which allows Democrats to pass it on their own. But the process includes limits; policies included in the bill must be related to spending and taxes and the legislation has to comply with a strict set of budget rules. It’s the same process Democrats used to pass the American Rescue Plan in 2021 and Republicans used to pass the Trump tax cuts of 2017.

Before Saturday’s vote, the Senate parliamentarian ruled that key Democratic provisions on clean energy and allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices passed muster and could be included in the inflation package, Democratic leaders said.

“While there was one unfortunate ruling in that the inflation rebate is more limited in scope,” Schumer said, “the overall program remains intact and we are one step closer to finally taking on Big Pharma and lowering Rx drug prices for millions of Americans. ”

The Democrats-only package, which includes several pieces of Biden’s Build Back Better agenda, was long thought to be dead after Sen. Joe Manchin, DW.Va., rejected a larger bill in December. He cut a deal last week with Schumer, pleasantly surprising many of his Democratic colleagues from him, and has since been on a media blitz to sell it.

“It’s a red, white and blue bill,” Manchin said recently on MSNBC, calling it “one of the greatest pieces of legislation” and “the bill that we need to fight inflation, to have more energy.”

On Thursday, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., following a week of silence, signed off on the bill after securing some changes to it.

Sinema forced Democrats to remove a provision that would have limited the carried interest tax break, which enables wealthy hedge fund and investment managers to pay a lower tax rate.

“We had no choice,” Schumer told reporters.

Instead, it was replaced by a new 1% excise tax on stock buybacks that is expected to bring in $74 billion — five times as much as the carried interest provision, Schumer said. Sinema also secured $4 billion in funding for drought prevention in Arizona and other western states.

Before her changes, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the bill would reduce the deficit by about $100 billion over a decade, with additional potential for $200 billion in revenue as a result of beefing up IRS resources for enforcement.

Senate Minority Whip John Thune, RS.D., promised “hard votes for the Democrats” in the vote-a-rama process.

“The question is, at the end, are those amendments going to be amendments actually that might change the bill? Could make it better. Might make it harder to pass in the House, who knows? Thune said Friday.

Some Democrats are worried about Republicans proposing poison pill amendments on contentious issues such as immigration and crime that could win a majority of votes in the Senate — picking off some moderates and vulnerable senators facing re-election this fall — but alienate other Democrats and disrupt the fragile deal.

“I certainly cannot support it, if extraneous provisions get adopted, particularly pejorative immigration provisions that have nothing to do with the health, welfare and security of the American people,” Sen. Bob Menendez, DN.J., said this week on MSNBC.

On Saturday, a handful of Senate Democrats took to Twitter and urged their colleagues to hold the line and vote down amendments that could jeopardize the package.

“I’ll vote NO on all amendments, even those I agree with,” tweeted Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn. “This bill makes historic progress on climate action and lowering prescription drug costs. It has 50 votes, and we need to stick together to keep it that way.”

Sen. Cory Booker, DN.J., agreed with that strategy. “There are a number of us who have already tweeted that we’re going to be voting no on amendments that we like and we don’t like,” he told reporters Saturday.

“There is such a moral urgency … to get a bill across the line that’s going to deal with the existential threat of climate change. I think that’s motivating and I’m seeing even more unity than normal.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, RS.C., said Friday the amendment process would be unpleasant. “What will vote-a-rama be like? It’ll be like hell,” he said.