Categories
US

Flashback: Manchin preached bipartisanship. Will he take the same position on inflation act?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A question arising from Sen. Joe Manchin’s, DW.Va., newfound backing of a massive social spending and taxation bill is if he will insist on Republican input and support as he previously did with other high profile legislation being pushed by Democrats.

Last year, Manchin declared that any legislation addressing voting rights, something Democrats declared was “under attack” at the time, must include input and support from Republicans in order to receive his backing.

He ultimately declined to support the Democrat-backed For the People Act, citing its lack of bipartisanship, and slammed his fellow Democrats for “partisan policymaking,” arguing it would “destroy” American democracy.

“The right to vote is fundamental to our American democracy and protecting that right should not be about party or politics. Least of all, protecting this right, which is a value I share, should never be done in a partisan manner,” he wrote in a statement at the time.

OVER 230 ECONOMISTS WARN MANCHIN’S SPENDING BILL WILL PERPETUATE INFLATION

US Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) delivers remarks to reporters at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US November 1, 2021.

US Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) delivers remarks to reporters at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US November 1, 2021.
(REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst)

“The truth is there is a better way — if we seek to find it together,” he later added.

Every Republican member of the Senate is expected to oppose the Inflation Reduction Act, the official name of the reconciliation spending bill struck in a behind closed doors deal between Manchin and Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

MANCHIN 2024 RE-ELECTION CHANCES COULD ‘DISAPPEAR IN A FLASH’ FOLLOWING SUPPORT FOR NEW SPENDING BILL

In contrast to his previous demands for bipartisanship, Manchin’s appears ready to help carry the bill over the line without any help from Senate Republicans. A simple majority will pass the legislation, with Vice President Kamala Harris able to break a 50-50 tie in favor of the Democrats.

Fox News Digital reached out to Manchin’s office for comment and received a statement from a spokeswoman touting his past efforts at bipartisanship, but making no mention of any desire for Republican input on the bill.

“For years, Senator Manchin has worked in a bipartisan way to ensure we are producing more energy domestically and paying down our national debt and much of that work is reflected in the Inflation Reduction Act,” communications director Samantha Runyon said in the statement.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of NY, speaks to the media after a Democratic policy luncheon, Tuesday, Oct. 19, 2021, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of NY, speaks to the media after a Democratic policy luncheon, Tuesday, Oct. 19, 2021, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
(AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Senate is set to reconvene Saturday and is expected to vote to begin debate on the bill.

Categories
US

Large Indiana employers Eli Lilly and Cummins speak out about the state’s new restrictive abortion law

An Eli Lilly and Company pharmaceutical manufacturing plant is pictured at 50 ImClone Drive in Branchburg, New Jersey, March 5, 2021.

Mike Segar | Reuters

Drugmaker Eli Lilly, one of the biggest employers in Indiana, said that the state’s newly passed law restricting abortions will cause the company to grow away from its home turf.

Lilly said in a statement on Saturday that it recognizes abortion as a “divisive and deeply personal issue with no clear consensus among the citizens of Indiana.”

“Despite this lack of agreement, Indiana has opted to quickly adopt one of the most restrictive anti-abortion laws in the United States,” Eli Lilly said. “We are concerned that this law will hinder Lilly’s — and Indiana’s — ability to attract diverse scientific, engineering and business talent from around the world. Given this new law, we will be forced to plan for more employment growth outside our home state.”

Indiana’s Legislature on Friday became the first in the nation to pass new legislation restricting access to abortions since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The state was among the earliest Republican-run state legislatures to debate tighter abortion laws after the Supreme Court ruling in June that removed constitutional protections for the procedure.

Lilly employs about 10,000 people in Indiana, where it has been headquartered in Indianapolis for more than 145 years.

Cummins, an engine manufacturing company that also employs about 10,000 people in Indiana, spoke out over the weekend against the new law as well.

“The right to make decisions regarding reproductive health ensures that women have the same opportunity as others to participate fully in our workforce and that our workforce is diverse,” a company spokesman said in a statement.

“There are provisions in the law that conflict with this, impact our people, impede our ability to attract and retain top talent and influence our decisions as we continue to grow our footprint with a focus on selecting welcoming and inclusive environments,” the Cummins spokesman said.

The two businesses join a growing list of companies, including tech giant Apple and denim retailer Levi Strauss, which are offering their employees resources for reproductive care in states where restrictions have been put into place.

Eli Lilly noted Saturday that although the pharmaceutical company has expanded its employee health plan coverage to include travel for reproductive services, “that may not be enough for some current and potential employees.”

Indiana’s abortion ban is expected to go into effect on Sept. 15. It comes with some exceptions, including for cases of rape or incest, and for protecting the mother’s life.

President Joe Biden’s administration has also condemned Indiana’s decision. White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre called it a “devastating step.”

“And, it’s another radical step by Republican legislators to take away women’s reproductive rights and freedom, and put personal health-care decisions in the hands of politicians rather than women and their doctors,” she said in a statement.

.

Categories
US

Republican who voted to impeach Trump projected to win primary | Republicans

Dan Newhouse, one of the few Republican House members to vote in January in favor of the impeachment of Donald Trump, is poised to move forward to the general election in Washington state, according to a projection by the Associated Press.

Newhouse was one of 10 Republicans who voted in January to have Trump impeached, even ahead of explosive revelations about the former president’s support and endorsement of the January 6 riots just a year prior.

This victory comes on the heels of another fellow Republican supporter of the impeachment, Peter Meijer, losing his votes in Michigan.

Republican Loren Culp, who has been backed by Trump in the election, was a close second to Newhouse in Washington’s fourth congressional district, garnering the second highest number of Republican votes in four out of the eight counties. In some of the counties where Newhouse won, however, I have received almost double the number of votes as Culp.

Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday morning at 7am BST

Culp was up against six other Republican candidates, and will face Doug White, the district’s only Democratic candidate, in November for the generation election.

Despite his victory, the journey has rarely been smooth for Newhouse. Following his vote for impeachment in January, six Republican leaders in his district demanded his resignation.

He defended his position, claiming he “made a decision to vote based on my oath to support and defend the constitution”.

On 2 August, he had a majority vote in three out of those six counties that had voted for his resignation.

Categories
US

Musk suggests deal could go through if Twitter provides info on confirming users

Tesla CEO Elon Musk suggested early Saturday that his acquisition deal with Twitter could still go through if the social media platform provided information about how it confirms that sampled accounts are real.

“If Twitter simply provides their method of sampling 100 accounts and how they’re confirmed to be real, the deal should proceed on original terms,” Musk tweeted. “However, if it turns out that their SEC filings are materially false, then it should not.”

Later he tweeted he was challenging the CEO of Twitter to a debate.

“I hereby challenge@paraga to a public debate about the Twitter bot percentage. Let him prove to the public that Twitter has <5% fake or spam daily users!” Musk tweeted.

Musk also tweeted out a poll asking if less than 5 percent of daily users on Twitter were spam or fake.

The tweets from Musk are the latest in the drama between the SpaceX CEO and the social media platform following legal action over his bid to buy Twitter.

Earlier this year, Musk reached a deal to buy Twitter for $44 billion, but less than three months later, he terminated the deal. His legal team argued at the time there was inadequate information provided about bots on Twitter’s site. The team also alleged that the social media company had fired several employees in violation of their agreement and that its statements regarding bots were not accurate.

The social media platform sued Musk to force him to complete the acquisition.

“Having mounted a public spectacle to put Twitter in play, and having proposed and then signed a seller-friendly merger agreement, Musk apparently believes that he—unlike every other party subject to Delaware contract law—is free to change his mind, trash the company, disrupt its operations, destroy stockholder value, and walk away,” the lawsuit against Musk said.

But Musk filed a countersuit earlier this month, with his lawyers alleging that he was not consulted on big decisions at the social media company and that the billionaire had entered into the agreement without knowing about the platform’s “misrepresentations or omissions,” which impacted his perception of the site’s value, according to The Associated Press.

Twitter hit back against the countersuit, saying that the argument was “imagined in an effort to escape a merger agreement that Musk no longer found attractive once the stock market—and along with it, his massive personal wealth—declined in value.”

Updated at 3:26 pm

.

Categories
US

Republican who voted to impeach Trump projected to win primary | Republicans

Dan Newhouse, one of the few Republican House members to vote in January in favor of the impeachment of Donald Trump, is poised to move forward to the general election in Washington state, according to a projection by the Associated Press.

Newhouse was one of 10 Republicans who voted in January to have Trump impeached, even ahead of explosive revelations about the former president’s support and endorsement of the January 6 riots just a year prior.

This victory comes on the heels of another fellow Republican supporter of the impeachment, Peter Meijer, losing his votes in Michigan.

Republican Loren Culp, who has been backed by Trump in the election, was a close second to Newhouse in Washington’s fourth congressional district, garnering the second highest number of Republican votes in four out of the eight counties. In some of the counties where Newhouse won, however, I have received almost double the number of votes as Culp.

Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday morning at 7am BST

Culp was up against six other Republican candidates, and will face Doug White, the district’s only Democratic candidate, in November for the generation election.

Despite his victory, the journey has rarely been smooth for Newhouse. Following his vote for impeachment in January, six Republican leaders in his district demanded his resignation.

He defended his position, claiming he “made a decision to vote based on my oath to support and defend the constitution”.

On 2 August, he had a majority vote in three out of those six counties that had voted for his resignation.

Categories
US

Butler Township, Ohio, killings: 4 dead at multiple scenes, police search for a man who is likely armed and dangerous

Stephen Marlow, a “person of interest,” is likely armed and dangerous, Butler Township Police Chief John Porter said at a media briefing.

In a statement Saturday, Porter said authorities are being assisted in the search by the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office, the FBI and ATF.

Information indicates Marlow may have fled outside Ohio, the statement read.

The FBI said he has ties to Lexington, Kentucky, Indianapolis and Chicago and may be in one of those cities.

Porter said Marlow was 5’11” and about 160 pounds, with brown hair. Authorities believe Marlow, 39, was wearing shorts and a yellow T-shirt and fled in a white 2007 Ford Edge.

Authorities have asked anyone with information to contact the FBI. They said Marlow should not be approached.

Police responded to a report of shots fired just before noon Friday, Porter said, and the four victims died at the scenes.

“This is the first violent crime in this neighborhood in recent memory,” Porter said. “We are working to determine if there was any reason for this horrible tragedy or if mental illness played any role.”

Stephen Marlow was driving this white Ford Edge, police said.
Wendy Chapman, a neighbor of one victim, told CNN affiliate WKEF the neighborhood is a quiet place.

“I would have never, even in this neighborhood, I would never expect anything, never,” Chapman told the Dayton station.

Police do not believe there is an ongoing threat to the neighborhood but have deployed additional crews and the Dayton Police Bomb Squad out of an abundance of caution, Porter said.

Porter said people should call the police dispatch if they have information on Marlow’s whereabouts or see the Ford Edge.

Butler Township is a town of just under 8,000 residents about 9 miles north of Dayton.

CNN’s Zenebou Sylla and Samantha Beech also contributed to this story.

.

Categories
US

How Alex Jones’ behavior impacts him in court

The total damages of nearly $50 million was significantly less than the $150 million in damages Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis were seeking.

Jones faces two more Sandy Hook trials to determine damages later this year: One for parents of a 6-year-old boy in an Austin court, and another for eight families in Connecticut.

Heslin and Lewis have testified that Jones’ constant push of false claims that the shooting was a hoax or staged made the last decade a “living hell” of death threats, online abuse and unrelenting trauma inflicted by Jones and his followers.

After years of false hoax claims, Jones admitted under oath that the shooting was “100% real” and even shook hands with the parents.

But the bombastic version of Jones was always lurking under the surface — or even on full display away from the courthouse.

During a break on the first day, he held an impromptu news conference just a few feet from the courtroom doors, declaring the proceedings a “kangaroo court” and “show trial” railroading his fight for free speech under the First Amendment. On the first day, he arrived at the courthouse with “Save the 1st” written on silver tape over his mouth by him.

When he came to the courthouse, it was always with a security detail of three or four guards. Jones, who wasn’t in court for the verdict, often skipped testimony to appear on his daily Infowars program, where the attacks on the judge and jury continued. During one show, Jones said the jury was pulled from a group of people who “don’t know what planet they live on.”

That clip was shown to the jury. So was a snapshot from his Infowars website showing Judge Maya Guerra Gamble engulfed in flames. She laughed at that.

Jones was only slightly less combative in court. He was the only witness to testify in his defense of him. Gamble warned Jones’ lawyers before it even started that if he tried to turn it into a performance, she would clear the courtroom and shut down the livestream broadcasting the trial to the world.

When Jones arrived for Lewis’ testimony, Gamble asked if he was chewing gum, a violation of a strict rule in her courtroom. She’d scolded his attorney Andino Reynal several times already.

That led to a testy exchange. Jones said he wasn’t chewing gum. Gamble said she could see his mouth moving. Jones opened wide and leaned over the defense table to show her a gap in her mouth where he’d had a tooth extracted. Jones insisted he was only massaging his hole with his tongue.

“Don’t show me,” the judge said.

Some legal experts said they were surprised by Jones’ behavior and questioned whether it was a calculated risk to increase his appeal to fans.

“It’s the most bizarre behavior I have ever seen at a trial,” said Barry Covert, a Buffalo, New York, First Amendment lawyer. “In my opinion, Jones is a money-making juggernaut — crazy like a fox,” Covert said. “The bigger the spectacle, the better.”

Kevin Goldberg, a First Amendment specialist at the Maryland-based Freedom Forum, said he found it hard to imagine what Jones might be thinking and what benefit he could derive from his behavior.

“I don’t know what it is designed to accomplish other than being on brand for Alex Jones,” said Goldberg. “This seems to be a man who has built his brand of him… on disrespecting the institutions of government… and this court.”

Defendants at trial are often given some leeway because they have so much at stake — prison in criminal cases and, in Jones’ civil trial, potential financial ruin. Monetary sanctions or even post-trial contemplate charges are also a possibility.

Gamble had to be careful how she handled it all, Covert said.

“Jones’ bizarre behavior is putting the judge in a very difficult box,” said Covert. “She doesn’t want to appear to put her finger on the scales of justice.”

Jones skipped Heslin’s testimony when he described for the jury holding his dead son in his arms with a “bullet hole through his head.”

Heslin said he wanted to confront Jones face-to-face and called his absence that day “cowardly.” Jones was instead appearing on his daily broadcast of him.

Jones was in the room when Lewis took the stand, sitting barely 10 feet (3 meters) away as she looked directly at him.

“My son existed. I am not ‘deep state,’ she said of the conspiracy theory of a shadowy network of federal workers running the government.

“I know you know that,” Lewis said.

When Lewis Jones asked if he thought she was an actor, Jones answered, “No,” but was cut off by Gamble, who scolded him for speaking out of turn.

At the end of that day, Jones and the parents shook hands. Lewis even handed Jones a sip of water to help calm a persistent cough Jones said was caused by a torn larynx. Her attorney Wesley Ball quickly stepped in to break it up.

“No,” Ball snapped at Jones, “You are NOT doing this.”

Jones was the only witness in his defense. His testimony from him pushed the rules of the court so often that the plaintiffs openly questioned whether Jones and his attorneys were trying to sabotage the proceedings and force a mistrial. They filed a motion for sanctions against them after Jones claimed he was bankrupt, which attorneys disputed and was off limits in testimony.

At one point, Jones appeared flabbergasted when the family’s attorneys announced that Jones’ legal team had mistakenly sent them two years’ worth of data from his cellphone — a massive data dump they said should have been produced in discovery but wasn’t. They said it proved he’d been receiving texts and emails about Sandy Hook and his media company’s finances that he hadn’t turned over under court orders.

“This is your Perry Mason moment,” Jones snapped.

Plaintiff’s attorney Mark Bankston said Thursday that the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the US Capitol had requested those materials and that he intended to give it to them.

The Jan. 6 committee first subpoenaed Jones in November, demanding a deposition and documents related to his efforts to spread misinformation about the 2020 election and a rally on the day of the attack.

During the trial, Jones often spoke out of turn, and was cut off when he veered into conspiracies, ranging from the Sept. 11 terror attacks being staged to a fake effort of the United Nations on world depopulation. He continued to call into question some of the biggest events and significant government institutions in American life.

“This,” the judge told him, “is not your show.”

Categories
US

How Alex Jones’ behavior impacts him in court

The total damages of nearly $50 million was significantly less than the $150 million in damages Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis were seeking.

Jones faces two more Sandy Hook trials to determine damages later this year: One for parents of a 6-year-old boy in an Austin court, and another for eight families in Connecticut.

Heslin and Lewis have testified that Jones’ constant push of false claims that the shooting was a hoax or staged made the last decade a “living hell” of death threats, online abuse and unrelenting trauma inflicted by Jones and his followers.

After years of false hoax claims, Jones admitted under oath that the shooting was “100% real” and even shook hands with the parents.

But the bombastic version of Jones was always lurking under the surface — or even on full display away from the courthouse.

During a break on the first day, he held an impromptu news conference just a few feet from the courtroom doors, declaring the proceedings a “kangaroo court” and “show trial” railroading his fight for free speech under the First Amendment. On the first day, he arrived at the courthouse with “Save the 1st” written on silver tape over his mouth by him.

When he came to the courthouse, it was always with a security detail of three or four guards. Jones, who wasn’t in court for the verdict, often skipped testimony to appear on his daily Infowars program, where the attacks on the judge and jury continued. During one show, Jones said the jury was pulled from a group of people who “don’t know what planet they live on.”

That clip was shown to the jury. So was a snapshot from his Infowars website showing Judge Maya Guerra Gamble engulfed in flames. She laughed at that.

Jones was only slightly less combative in court. He was the only witness to testify in his defense of him. Gamble warned Jones’ lawyers before it even started that if he tried to turn it into a performance, she would clear the courtroom and shut down the livestream broadcasting the trial to the world.

When Jones arrived for Lewis’ testimony, Gamble asked if he was chewing gum, a violation of a strict rule in her courtroom. She’d scolded his attorney Andino Reynal several times already.

That led to a testy exchange. Jones said he wasn’t chewing gum. Gamble said she could see his mouth moving. Jones opened wide and leaned over the defense table to show her a gap in her mouth where he’d had a tooth extracted. Jones insisted he was only massaging his hole with his tongue.

“Don’t show me,” the judge said.

Some legal experts said they were surprised by Jones’ behavior and questioned whether it was a calculated risk to boost his appeal to fans.

“It’s the most bizarre behavior I have ever seen at a trial,” said Barry Covert, a Buffalo, New York, First Amendment lawyer. “In my opinion, Jones is a money-making juggernaut — crazy like a fox,” Covert said. “The bigger the spectacle, the better.”

Kevin Goldberg, a First Amendment specialist at the Maryland-based Freedom Forum, said he found it hard to imagine what Jones might be thinking and what benefit he could derive from his behavior.

“I don’t know what it is designed to accomplish other than being on brand for Alex Jones,” said Goldberg. “This seems to be a man who has built his brand of him… on disrespecting the institutions of government… and this court.”

Defendants at trial are often given some leeway because they have so much at stake — prison in criminal cases and, in Jones’ civil trial, potential financial ruin. Monetary sanctions or even post-trial contemplate charges are also a possibility.

Gamble had to be careful how she handled it all, Covert said.

“Jones’ bizarre behavior is putting the judge in a very difficult box,” said Covert. “She doesn’t want to appear to put her finger on the scales of justice.”

Jones skipped Heslin’s testimony when he described for the jury holding his dead son in his arms with a “bullet hole through his head.”

Heslin said he wanted to confront Jones face-to-face and called his absence that day “cowardly.” Jones was instead appearing on his daily broadcast of him.

Jones was in the room when Lewis took the stand, sitting barely 10 feet (3 meters) away as she looked directly at him.

“My son existed. I am not ‘deep state,’ she said of the conspiracy theory of a shadowy network of federal workers running the government.

“I know you know that,” Lewis said.

When Lewis Jones asked if he thought she was an actor, Jones answered, “No,” but was cut off by Gamble, who scolded him for speaking out of turn.

At the end of that day, Jones and the parents shook hands. Lewis even handed Jones a sip of water to help calm a persistent cough Jones said was caused by a torn larynx. Her attorney Wesley Ball quickly stepped in to break it up.

“No,” Ball snapped at Jones, “You are NOT doing this.”

Jones was the only witness in his defense. His testimony from him pushed the rules of the court so often that the plaintiffs openly questioned whether Jones and his attorneys were trying to sabotage the proceedings and force a mistrial. They filed a motion for sanctions against them after Jones claimed he was bankrupt, which attorneys disputed and was off limits in testimony.

At one point, Jones appeared flabbergasted when the family’s attorneys announced that Jones’ legal team had mistakenly sent them two years’ worth of data from his cellphone — a massive data dump they said should have been produced in discovery but wasn’t. They said it proved he’d been receiving texts and emails about Sandy Hook and his media company’s finances that he hadn’t turned over under court orders.

“This is your Perry Mason moment,” Jones snapped.

Plaintiff’s attorney Mark Bankston said Thursday that the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the US Capitol had requested those materials and that he intended to give it to them.

The Jan. 6 committee first subpoenaed Jones in November, demanding a deposition and documents related to his efforts to spread misinformation about the 2020 election and a rally on the day of the attack.

During the trial, Jones often spoke out of turn, and was cut off when he veered into conspiracies, ranging from the Sept. 11 terror attacks being staged to a fake effort of the United Nations on world depopulation. He continued to call into question some of the biggest events and significant government institutions in American life.

“This,” the judge told him, “is not your show.”

Categories
US

Windsor Hills crash victim, son, and fiancé were headed to pregnancy checkup

Asherey Ryan, her 11-month-old son Alonzo, and her fiancé, Reynold Lester were on their way to a pregnancy checkup when, in what seemed like a fraction of a second, they were gone.

“My worst fears came true,” Asherey’s sister, Cotie Davis, said at a gathering of grieving family members Friday. “I used to pray for my sisters all of the time. I had always seen (crashes) on TV. You never expect it to happen to you.”

Asherey was six months pregnant. Her unborn child of her, whom she planned to name Armani, also died.

Ashley Ryan, Alonzo, Reynold Lester. (Family photos)

“It’s hard to believe I’m never going to see them again. I ca n’t even imagine staring over her casket of her. This has definitely taken a huge chunk of me.” Davis told reporters, struggling to contain her emotions.

Authorities believe Nicole Linton, 37, a traveling nurse from Texas, was going at least 80 miles an hour when she plowed her Mercedes into crossing traffic at the intersection of La Brea and Slauson avenues in Windsor Hills Thursday afternoon.

Several vehicles then careened into a gas station in a ball of fire.

Six people were killed and eight others were injured.

On Friday, California Highway Patrol arrested Linton on suspicion of vehicular manslaughter even though she remained hospitalized with undisclosed injuries.

CHP told KTLA that Linton is cooperating with investigators.

Formal charges are expected next week – possibly as early as Monday.

“Why is she still alive?” asked one family member at Friday’s gathering. “Of all these lives that were lost, why is she still alive?”

Categories
US

Uber prices surged wildly after SF’s Outside Lands festival

It is a tale as old as time — a music festival ends, and people need to get home. Unfortunately, that few mile trip back to your apartment almost always ends up being a nightmare.

To try to soften the travel apocalypse, Outside Lands runs extra MUNI service throughout the festival, with added buses along the 5R Fulton bus on the north of Golden Gate Park, and more service along the N-Judah light rail line on south of the park . However, despite these additional reinforcements, other bus routes like the 38 Geary were swamped shortly after the festival let out.

Biking is the easiest way to get to and from the festival, and Outside Lands offers extensive bike parking near the entrances.

The ridehailing pickup point north of Golden Gate Park during Outside Lands.

The ridehailing pickup point north of Golden Gate Park during Outside Lands.

Dan Gentile

If you dared to use a ride-hailing company after the festival, dedicated pickup zones a few blocks off of Fulton and Judah tried to lessen the logistical burden, but even so, you likely experienced some serious sticker shock.

Up until around 9 pm, prices remained fairly reasonable by 2022 standards, with a short trip to the Lower Haight costing around $20, and a trip to Oakland costing $45.

However as dueling headliners SZA, Phoebe Bridgers and Disclosure began letting out at 10 pm, prices surged wildly, with that same 4-mile Lower Haight trip costing $62, and that Oakland ride clocking in at $140. A ride to North Beach neared $80. and the cost of trips to further-flung San Francisco neighborhoods like Mission Bay or Glen Park almost hit triple digits, topping $90.

A screenshot of ridehailing prices during the first night of Outside Lands.

A screenshot of ridehailing prices during the first night of Outside Lands.


Dan Gentile

A screenshot of ridehailing prices during the first night of Outside Lands.

A screenshot of ridehailing prices during the first night of Outside Lands.


Dan Gentile

Ride-hailing prices arose after Outside Lands. Credit: Dan Gentile

So if you’re planning on hailing a ride the next few nights, it unfortunately might be best to skip out on that headliner’s encore.

MORE OUTSIDE LANDS COVERAGE:

— Everything you need to know before you go to SF’s Outside Lands

— The best photos from Day One of Outside Lands

— What it’s like to be the only Bay Area rapper playing Outside Lands

— The best bands to see at San Francisco’s Outside Lands music festival