Categories
US

Inflation Reduction Act extends $7,500 tax credit for electric cars

David Madison | Photodisc | Getty Images

A federal tax break that’s available to car buyers for going electric may work differently starting next year.

Under the Inflation Reduction Act — which received Senate approval on Sunday and is expected to clear the House this week — a tax credit worth up to $7,500 for buyers of new all-electric cars and hybrid plug-ins would be extended through 2032. The bill would also create a separate tax credit worth a maximum $4,000 for used versions of these vehicles.

Yet the measure would also usher in new limits to both who can qualify for the credit and which vehicles are eligible for it.

The tax credit has ‘price and income restrictions’

“First, in order to qualify, there are price and income restrictions,” said Seth Goldstein, a senior equity analyst at Morningstar.

For new vehicles, the manufacturer’s suggested retail price for sedans would need to be below $55,000 to be eligible for the tax credit. For SUVs, trucks and vans, that price cap would be $80,000.

Additionally, the credit would be unavailable to single tax filers with modified adjusted gross income above $150,000. For married couples filing jointly, that income limit would be $300,000, and for individuals who file as head of household, $225,000.

“What we’ve seen is that many [electric vehicles] are luxury cars,” Goldstein said. “And buyers of those are in higher income brackets, so that limits right away the ability to qualify for the tax credit.”

For used electric vehicles to qualify, the car would need to be at least two model years old, among other restrictions. The credit would be worth either $4,000 or 30% of the car’s price — whichever is less — and the price cap would be $25,000.

Those purchases also would come with income caps: Individual tax filers with income above $75,000 would be ineligible for the credit. That cap would be $150,000 for joint filers and $112,500 for heads of household.

More from Personal Finance:
How to know if you’re affected by Equifax credit score errors
30 companies that help employees pay off their student loans
Climate change is making some homes too costly to insure

Another determining factor for whether a vehicle would qualify for a full or partial credit (or neither) include a requirement that the final assembly of the car would need to be in North America. Additional qualifiers include limitations on where key materials for batteries can come from and a mandate that a specified portion of battery components must be manufactured or assembled in North America.

“It’s designed to encourage domestic production in North America,” said Scott Cockerham, an attorney and partner at Orrick.

Many electric vehicles may not qualify for the credit

However, it could be difficult for cars to qualify, he said, depending on where they source their materials and where they complete the manufacturing process. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation has warned that many electric vehicles will be ineligible for the credit right off the bat.

Additionally, another change in the legislation would allow a car buyer who qualifies for the tax credit to transfer it to the dealership, which could then lower the price of the car.

Meanwhile, another modification included in the bill is good news for some electric vehicle manufacturers.

Basically, the existing $7,500 credit was authorized in 2008 and 2009 legislation with the intention of spurring adoption of electric cars. Part of that included a phase-out of the tax credit once a manufacturer reached 200,000 of the vehicles sold.

Tesla hit that threshold in 2018, which means their electric cars currently do not qualify for the tax credit. General Motors is in the same position. Toyota (including its Lexus brand) also has now crossed that threshold, and its electric cars are scheduled to be ineligible for the tax credit after a phaseout of it ends in September 2023.

The congressional measure would eliminate that 200,000 sales cap, making their electric cars again eligible for the credit — at least based on that sales-threshold removal.

.

Categories
US

Rep. Ilhan Omar survives close primary after campaign focused on policing

Comment

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) narrowly defeated a primary challenger on Tuesday, topping former Minneapolis city councilman Don Samuels by a single-digit margin after a campaign focused on crime and Omar’s effectiveness in Congress.

“Tonight’s victory is a testament to how much our district believes in the collective values ​​we are fighting for, and how much they’re willing to do to help us overcome defeat,” Omar said in a statement after Samuels, 73, conceded defeat.

With all but a few precincts reporting, Omar led Samuels by fewer than 3,000 votes out of more than 110,000 cast in Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District.

It was the narrowest win yet by an incumbent member of the “Squad,” the name adopted by six left-wing Democrats who defeated more moderate opponents in 2018 and 2020. The margin was also a surprise to supporters of Omar, who had prevailed in the face of millions of dollars in spending against her two years ago.

Omar’s close call came after her critics in the party mobilized against her, arguing that Samuels, who had campaigned against a 2021 ballot measure that would have disbanded and replaced the Minneapolis Police Department, would better represent the heavily Democratic district. That ballot measure sprung out of the police reform movement that grew after the May 2020 murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin — a movement that has been blamed by some Democrats for alienating suburban voters.

Trump-backed Michels projected to win Wisconsin GOP gubernatorial primary, setting stage for marquee fall race

“We need partners across levels of government who prioritize teamwork, collaboration, and a seriousness of approach to match the seriousness of the issues we face,” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said in a statement last week, announcing his support for Samuels.

Omar’s campaign had initially dismissed the threat from Samuels, a longtime Democratic activist who left the council in 2018 and lost a race for more than nine years ago. He entered the race in March, after no other challenger emerged. Omar had won an expensive primary in 2020, when pro-Israel groups and donors poured in resources for her opponent — a result that kept some groups that had opposed her, like the pro-Israel group AIPAC, on the sidelines this year.

In an interview shortly after he announced his campaign, Samuels told The Washington Post that Omar had been wrong to support the 2021 ballot measure, and that she had made trouble for Democratic leadership without noting her own accomplishments.

“She’s making points, gaining notoriety, and we are left unrepresented and unaccounted for,” Samuels said at the time.

The 2021 defeat of the ballot measure was a major setback for Omar and the Democratic Party’s left wing in Minneapolis, just a year after Floyd’s murder inspired a political uprising, including riots that torched the Minneapolis Police Department’s 3rd Precinct.

Several members of the Minneapolis City Council who had voted to disband the police department lost reelection that year, while Frey won reelection over a policing “abolitionist” supported by Omar. The ballot measure to disband the police department failed by 12 points, in a city that had voted for Joe Biden in 2020 by a 75-point landslide.

“The Black Lives Matter movement didn’t really take off in Minneapolis,” Samuels told The Post. “It was a couple other groups that benefited from the drama around the George Floyd crisis.”

Omar declined to debate Samuels during the campaign and spent less on this primary than she did to win in 2020. Her campaign opted not to run TV ads, while a pro-Samuels PAC went on the air in the final week. Omar outspent Samuels overall, $2.1 million to Samuels’s roughly $800,000. But the Make A Difference MN05 PAC, founded just two weeks before the primary, spent more than $600,000 against Omar.

In an interview Tuesday at an affordable housing apartment complex in the Minneapolis suburb of Richfield before polls closed, Omar said she wasn’t surprised at the challenge from Samuels.

“I think that when you push power, power pushes back,” she said. “We’ve never been afraid to challenge the status quo. And when people feel threatened by the kind of progress that’s being made, they’ll do anything to take it back.”

At a voting location at the nearby House of Prayer Lutheran Church, 59-year old Dawn Welter, a coffee shop worker, said abortion rights were the main issue bringing her to the primary. She was one of the only people walking out of the polls around 10 am

“I’ve always been a liberal, but it just reinforces the importance of getting out in the primaries,” she said. “Ilhan is very smart. Ella she is for everybody. I feel like she speaks her mind about her, and she backs up what she says.

Turnout was tracking lower this year than it had in 2020, another factor that liberals saw as a problem for Omar. While she had avoided the kind of multimillion-dollar ad campaigns that brought down other Israel critics in Democratic primaries this year, Omar’s supporters called the win a triumph for grass-roots politics.

“Congresswoman Ilhan Omar has faced some of the ugliest attacks of any elected official and had hundreds of thousands of dollars spent against her,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement.

Local Democrats who opposed Omar said that they’d done so because they felt the incumbent had gotten away from the needs of the district.

“I endorsed Samuels because he listened to what my constituents wanted, which is a closer relationship with our member of Congress,” said Jake Spano, the mayor of St. Louis Park. “I hope Congresswoman Omar hears that request and is willing to work with me on it.”

Sheila Regan in Minneapolis contributed to this report.

Categories
US

Protesters disrupt Los Angeles City Council vote on banning homeless encampments near schools

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Los Angeles City Council meeting on Tuesday, when members voted to expand on a bill that prevents homeless people from forming encampments near schools, was disrupted by a group of protesters who broke through a security barricade and threatened the lawmakers.

A recess was called just before the council voted 11-3 to extend an existing ban on homeless encampments within 500 feet of schools and day care centers in Los Angeles, as protesters who claimed the initiative would further isolate and negatively impact the homeless community disrupted the City Council meeting. Two people were arrested, the Los Angeles Police Department said.

Los Angeles City Councilman Paul Krekorian, who represents the Second District, described the protest as an “attack” that included verbal threats against the lawmakers.

“In yet another attack on constitutional democracy, for the second time in a week, a small mob of extremists today again shut down a public meeting of the City Council,” Krekorian said. “In the process, they breached a security barrier, physically threatened the Council, and attacked police officers. One of them was arrested two feet from my desk.”

LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL APPROVES MEASURE TO BAN HOMELESS ENCAMPMENTS NEAR SCHOOLS

Protesters gather as the Los Angeles City Council votes on a ban on homeless encampments within 500 feet of schools and day care centers

Protesters gather as the Los Angeles City Council votes on a ban on homeless encampments within 500 feet of schools and day care centers
(KTTV)

During the incident, one sergeant and two Security Services Division officers who are responsible for the safety and security of City buildings were injured.

The Los Angeles Police Department confirmed the disruption and said one of the detained suspects was a woman who charged the city council members.

“Officers were involved in a minor use of force while attempting to make the arrests,” LAPD said.

LA CITY COUNCIL GREENLIGHTS BAN ON HOMELESS ENCAMPMENTS 500 FEET FROM SCHOOLS, DAY CARE CENTERS

A woman breached barriers at the Los Angeles City Council meeting and charged at lawmakers while yelling obscenities.

A woman breached barriers at the Los Angeles City Council meeting and charged at lawmakers while yelling obscenities.
(KTTV)

Police officers eventually dispelled the protesters and order was regained in the chamber.

“The unlawful assembly was declared at 11:07 am, and the crowd was given 30 minutes to disperse. The crowd dispersed as ordered while the Media remained. At approximately 11:40 am, Council reconvened, voted and approved 41.18 LAMC.”

Tuesday’s vote expanded on a provision that cleared the chamber last week, also by an 11-3 vote, that initially barred homeless encampments to schools and day care centers specifically identified by the council. Protesters similarly interrupted last week’s city council meeting on Aug. 2.

“There can never be any excuse or rationalization for this kind of anarchic lawlessness,” Krekorian added. “The people of our nation cannot tolerate raging extremists entering public buildings and threatening public officials with the attempt to shut down the government, no matter what their viewpoints may be.”

LOS ANGELES HOTEL LEADER WARNS HOMELESS HOUSING PROPOSAL WILL ‘KILL’ INDUSTRY’S MARKETABILITY

Homeless encampments block the street on an overpass of the Hollywood freeway in Los Angeles July 7, 2021.

Homeless encampments block the street on an overpass of the Hollywood freeway in Los Angeles July 7, 2021.
(AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File)

“Every Angeleno should be outraged by what happened today in their City Hall. Anyone who seeks to be a leader in this city must actively denounce this kind of nonsense in clear and unambiguous terms,” ​​the council member continued.

Supporters of the blanket ban said it was designed to ensure the safety of children, many of whom walk near the homeless encampments on their way to school. Some encampments include people who use drugs or suffer from mental health conditions.

“This is something to protect kids in our city,” Council member Paul Koretz, who represents the Fifth District, said before the measure passed.

The bill’s opponents, however, said it “displaces” the homeless and criminalizes their condition.

“Enforcement of anti-camping ordinances, then, only displaces people and makes it harder for trained outreach staff to establish trust again. Residents of cleared encampments, unless connected to stable permanent housing through a trauma-informed case management process, often return to unsheltered homelessness,” the nonprofit People Assisting The Homeless, or PATH, said in a statement.

People at a homeless encampment in Toriumi Plaza at 1st St. and Judge John Aiso St. in Los Angeles Thursday, March 17, 2022.

People at a homeless encampment in Toriumi Plaza at 1st St. and Judge John Aiso St. in Los Angeles Thursday, March 17, 2022.
(Hans Gutknecht/MediaNews Group/Los Angeles Daily News via Getty Images)

Protesters inside the chamber could be heard shouting “Abolish 41.18,” the law that dictates where homeless encampments can be located.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The city of Los Angeles includes about 750 public schools and nearly 1,000 day care facilities, which will all be impacted by the ban.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti must sign the ban before it takes effect.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Categories
US

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers slams GOP primary winner Tim Michels as ‘most extreme and divisive nominee possible’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Wisconsin Democratic Gov. Tony Evers responded to Trump-endorsed Tim Michels’ projected win in the Republican gubernatorial primary on Tuesday by labeling him as “radical” and “divisive.”

Michels defeated former Wisconsin Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch and two other Republican candidates in the GOP primary, and will face off against Evers in the general election in November.

In a statement following Michels’ projected primary victory, Evers’ campaign said his upcoming Republican opponent is “the most extreme and divisive nominee possible” who will say anything to appease former President Trump.

Wisconsin Gov.  Tony Evers will face off against Trump-endorsed Tim Michels in November's general election.

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers will face off against Trump-endorsed Tim Michels in November’s general election.
(Melina Mara-Pool/Getty Images)

“After a scorched earth primary that’s seen constant attacks and a dizzying race to the radical right, the Republican Party has chosen the most extreme and divisive nominee possible, one that will tell Donald Trump anything just to keep his endorsement,” the statement read. “From abortion and voting rights, to gun safety and public education — Tim Michels has staked out the most extreme positions possible, with the goal of dividing our state and pitting neighbors against one another.”

TRUMP-BACKED TIM MICHELS PROJECTED WINNER IN BATTLEGROUND WISCONSIN’S GOP GOVERNMENT PRIMARY

Michels is a multimillionaire owner of a construction company who used millions of his own money on his campaign. Trump offered his endorsement of him in early June. Michels called Evers a “weak leader” in his victory speech Tuesday night, and vowed to make the governor an “unessential worker come November.”

HEAD TO THE FOX NEWS ELECTIONS CENTER FOR THE LATEST PRIMARY RESULTS

Wisconsin Republican gubernatorial candidate Tim Michels, left speaks as former President Trump, right, listens at a rally Aug. 5, 2022, in Waukesha, Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Republican gubernatorial candidate Tim Michels, left speaks as former President Trump, right, listens at a rally Aug. 5, 2022, in Waukesha, Wisconsin.
(AP Photo/Morry Gash)

The Evers campaign highlighted Michels’ support for an 1849 abortion ban that does not offer exceptions in cases of rape or incest. The governor’s campaign also noted his Republican foe’s questioning of election results, pro-Second Amendment stance and opposition to additional public school funding.

“Tim Michels wants to enforce an abortion ban from 1849 that has no exceptions for rape or incest, and he’s previously said it’s ‘not unreasonable’ for a rape victim to be forced to give birth,” Evers’ campaign said. “Michels has said he’s open to overturning election results if he doesn’t like the outcome, he’s come out against common sense gun safety legislation that would protect our kids, and Michels has even said it was ‘insanity’ to invest more money in our public schools.”

Wisconsin Gov.  Tony Evers' campaign said Republicans chose "the most extreme and divisive nominee possible" in electing Tim Michels.

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers’ campaign said Republicans chose “the most extreme and divisive nominee possible” in electing Tim Michels.
(AP Photo/Andy Manis, File)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“While Tim Michels wants to divide our communities, Gov. Evers is committed to bringing people together and working to address rising costs, help small businesses, expand high-speed internet, and give our kids the education they need to thrive,” the statement continued. “There’s a lot at stake this November, and Gov. Evers will always do the right thing for our state.”

Evers, who is seeking a second term as governor following his matchup with Michels in November, faced no primary challenger in Tuesday’s election.

Categories
US

Democrats betting on progressives to keep control of the Senate

“When they’re victorious, it will have such a huge impact for so many reasons,” said Maurice Mitchell, national director of the progressive Working Families Party. “Every week it becomes more and more plausible that the Democrats maintain governing majorities in both houses, and might even expand the governing majority in the Senate. That will mean that we get another bite at the apple of governing. It means that we will no longer be subject to the Sinema or the Manchin veto.”

Republicans, meanwhile, see the rise of Barnes and Fetterman as an opening to pick off independent and suburban voters. During their primaries, many GOP operatives thought they were likely to be less formidable general election candidates than their more moderate opponents.

“Democrats nominated the most liberal candidates they could find in states that are struggling because of Joe Biden and the Democrats’ agenda that’s resulted in record gas prices, skyrocketing inflation, crime raging, and a border crisis,” said Chris Hartline, a spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee. “We look forward to watching Mandela Barnes defend his embrace of defunding law enforcement and John Fetterman defend his support of him for banning fracking.”

Pennsylvania is widely considered to be the best chance for Democrats to flip a seat in the evenly divided Senate, while Sen. Ron Johnson in Wisconsin, Barnes’ opponent, is viewed as the most vulnerable Republican incumbent in the chamber.

The fact that Democrats are rallying behind Barnes and Fetterman represents a departure from past election cycles, when they typically selected centrist candidates to be their standard bearers in battleground Senate races. That has worried some moderates in the Democratic Party who believe the candidates have baggage that could alienate swing voters.

When Barnes touted Sanders’ endorsement last month, Matt Bennett, a co-founder of the center-left group Third Way, tweeted, “Why would you do this? WHY???”

In an interview, Bennett said that Barnes is “a very appealing candidate in many, many ways for both wings of the party. He’s dynamic and smart and young and he could be great. But we were nervous — we are nervous — that some of the things he’s done and said are going to make it tough to win in a swing state like Wisconsin.”

At the beginning of the year, Bennett said he was also concerned that Fetterman’s progressive bona fides would hurt him in the general election. But in recent months he has been impressed as Fetterman has outpolled and outraised his Republican opponent, celebrity doctor Mehmet Oz: “Fetterman offers a pretty good roadmap for Barnes, which is, after he wrapped up the nomination, he has made very clear that he’s his own guy. He’s a different kind of Democrat.”

The early polling in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin has excited liberals, particularly after suffering losses in several House primaries this year. A Fox News survey found Fetterman leading Oz by 11 percentage points. A Marquette Law School poll put Barnes ahead of Johnson by two points, which was within the margin of error.

“Both Barnes and Fetterman are extraordinary candidates who are showing that you can be for progressive policies like Medicare for All and win in battleground states,” said Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a former co-chair of Sanders’ 2020 presidential campaign.

Republicans have argued that neither candidate was seriously tested during their primaries, and that voters are just beginning to learn about them. Oz’s first TV ad in the general election tied Fetterman to Biden and Sanders and cast his record on him as soft on crime. The GOP has pointed to Barnes’ support of the Green New Deal as well as his late payment of property taxes in 2019 as vulnerabilities.

Ben Voelkel, a senior adviser to Johnson’s campaign, said Barnes is campaigning on a “socialist’s wish list of the Green New Deal, defunding the police and abolishing ICE.”

Brittany Yanick, a spokesperson for Oz, said Fetterman is “the most radical candidate in the country.”

Democrats have likewise sought to portray Oz and Johnson as too conservative. They note that Oz, who was endorsed by former President Donald Trump in the primary, said “we cannot move on” from the 2020 election, and Johnson echoed Trump’s false claims of voter fraud.

“It’s Oz’s support for banning abortion that is radical here in Pennsylvania,” said Fetterman spokesperson Joe Calvello. Oz aides say that their candidate opposes abortion but supports exceptions for rape, incest and to protect the life of the mother.

Lauren Chou, a spokeswoman for Barnes, said, “When Ron Johnson’s priorities are repealing the Affordable Care Act, slashing Social Security, and shipping American jobs overseas, the only thing he and his allies can do is make up lies about Mandela Barnes.”

Barnes and Fetterman have made efforts to appeal to a broad electorate ahead of November. They have declined to make Medicare for All the centerpiece of their campaigns and distanced themselves from some progressive positions. Fetterman has even said recently that he doesn’t consider himself a progressive, while Barnes has argued “it’s not about labels.”

In his first run for the Senate in 2016, Fetterman backed a moratorium on new fracking. He now opposes a ban on fracking, a controversial method for extracting natural gas. Tens of thousands of Pennsylvania jobs are dependent on fracking. For his part, Barnes, who was once photographed holding an “Abolish ICE” T-shirt, said he does not support eliminating Immigration and Customs Enforcement or defunding police.

Barnes’ campaign has been careful to also point out that, along with a nod from Sanders, he has won endorsements from more establishment Democrats, such as House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn. Fetterman’s team has likewise noted that while he endorsed Sanders in 2016 and Sanders campaigned for him in his 2018 bid for lieutenant governor, he did not support him in the 2020 primary.

Max Berger, former director of progressive outreach for Elizabeth Warren’s 2020 presidential campaign, said he doesn’t mind that Fetterman and Barnes have put space between themselves and the “progressive” label.

“It’s smart for progressives to not limit themselves to being a slice of the party but to claim to speak on behalf of the party as a whole,” he said. “I think it’s one of my favorite things about both these guys — is that they don’t want to be small. They’re like, ‘I represent the entire Democratic Party.’”

If either is successful, Berger said he will still consider it a major victory for the left: “It’s a huge opportunity for progressives to show that we can be part of making sure Democrats are in the majority.”

Categories
US

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers slams GOP primary winner Tim Michels as ‘most extreme and divisive nominee possible’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Wisconsin Democratic Gov. Tony Evers responded to Trump-endorsed Tim Michels’ projected win in the Republican gubernatorial primary on Tuesday by labeling him as “radical” and “divisive.”

Michels defeated former Wisconsin Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch and two other Republican candidates in the GOP primary, and will face off against Evers in the general election in November.

In a statement following Michels’ projected primary victory, Evers’ campaign said his upcoming Republican opponent is “the most extreme and divisive nominee possible” who will say anything to appease former President Trump.

Wisconsin Gov.  Tony Evers will face off against Trump-endorsed Tim Michels in November's general election.

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers will face off against Trump-endorsed Tim Michels in November’s general election.
(Melina Mara-Pool/Getty Images)

“After a scorched earth primary that’s seen constant attacks and a dizzying race to the radical right, the Republican Party has chosen the most extreme and divisive nominee possible, one that will tell Donald Trump anything just to keep his endorsement,” the statement read. “From abortion and voting rights, to gun safety and public education — Tim Michels has staked out the most extreme positions possible, with the goal of dividing our state and pitting neighbors against one another.”

TRUMP-BACKED TIM MICHELS PROJECTED WINNER IN BATTLEGROUND WISCONSIN’S GOP GOVERNMENT PRIMARY

Michels is a multimillionaire owner of a construction company who used millions of his own money on his campaign. Trump offered his endorsement of him in early June. Michels called Evers a “weak leader” in his victory speech Tuesday night, and vowed to make the governor an “unessential worker come November.”

HEAD TO THE FOX NEWS ELECTIONS CENTER FOR THE LATEST PRIMARY RESULTS

Wisconsin Republican gubernatorial candidate Tim Michels, left speaks as former President Trump, right, listens at a rally Aug. 5, 2022, in Waukesha, Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Republican gubernatorial candidate Tim Michels, left speaks as former President Trump, right, listens at a rally Aug. 5, 2022, in Waukesha, Wisconsin.
(AP Photo/Morry Gash)

The Evers campaign highlighted Michels’ support for an 1849 abortion ban that does not offer exceptions in cases of rape or incest. The governor’s campaign also noted his Republican foe’s questioning of election results, pro-Second Amendment stance and opposition to additional public school funding.

“Tim Michels wants to enforce an abortion ban from 1849 that has no exceptions for rape or incest, and he’s previously said it’s ‘not unreasonable’ for a rape victim to be forced to give birth,” Evers’ campaign said. “Michels has said he’s open to overturning election results if he doesn’t like the outcome, he’s come out against common sense gun safety legislation that would protect our kids, and Michels has even said it was ‘insanity’ to invest more money in our public schools.”

Wisconsin Gov.  Tony Evers' campaign said Republicans chose "the most extreme and divisive nominee possible" in electing Tim Michels.

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers’ campaign said Republicans chose “the most extreme and divisive nominee possible” in electing Tim Michels.
(AP Photo/Andy Manis, File)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“While Tim Michels wants to divide our communities, Gov. Evers is committed to bringing people together and working to address rising costs, help small businesses, expand high-speed internet, and give our kids the education they need to thrive,” the statement continued. “There’s a lot at stake this November, and Gov. Evers will always do the right thing for our state.”

Evers, who is seeking a second term as governor following his matchup with Michels in November, faced no primary challenger in Tuesday’s election.

Categories
US

Trump to be deposed by NY AG in civil probe of his business practices

Former President Donald Trump is expected to be deposed by lawyers from New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office Wednesday in his probe into the Trump Organization’s business practices, a lawyer for Trump confirmed to NBC News.

It is unclear whether Trump’s deposition will be in person or over a video conference.

James’ office is considering whether to file a civil suit against Trump and his company and has said in court filings that it has “uncovered substantial evidence establishing numerous misrepresentations in Mr. Trump’s financial statements provided to banks, insurers, and the Internal Revenue Service. ”

These statements were inflated by hundreds of millions of dollars and signed off on by the former president, James has alleged.

The former president has denied wrongdoing and has claimed that the probe by James, a Democrat, is politically motivated.

Posting on his Truth Social platform, Trump said he was in New York City and would see the attorney general “for a continuation of the greatest Witch Hunt in US history! My great company, and myself, are being attacked from all sides. Banana Republic !”

Trump’s two eldest children, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, recently testified in the civil probe. NBC News reported Trump Jr. was interviewed a couple of weeks ago and Ivanka spoke to investigators last week. Neither of them pleaded the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination. Sources did not confirm whether their testimony took place in person or virtually.

Earlier this week, Cushman & Wakefield, a commercial real estate firm that appraised several Trump Organization properties, handed over nearly 36,000 documents to the attorney general.

The deposition comes in the wake of the FBI searching Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago in Florida, with a source familiar with the matter telling NBC News that the search was tied to classified information Trump allegedly took with him from the White House to his Palm Beach resort in January 2021.

rebecca shabad contributed.

Categories
US

NJ hospital employee arrested after 39 guns, ammo found inside closet

Categories
US

Trump to be deposed by NY AG in civil probe of his business practices

Former President Donald Trump is expected to be deposed by lawyers from New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office Wednesday in his probe into the Trump Organization’s business practices, a lawyer for Trump confirmed to NBC News.

It is unclear whether Trump’s deposition will be in person or over a video conference.

James’ office is considering whether to file a civil suit against Trump and his company and has said in court filings that it has “uncovered substantial evidence establishing numerous misrepresentations in Mr. Trump’s financial statements provided to banks, insurers, and the Internal Revenue Service. ”

These statements were inflated by hundreds of millions of dollars and signed off on by the former president, James has alleged.

The former president has denied wrongdoing and has claimed that the probe by James, a Democrat, is politically motivated.

Posting on his Truth Social platform, Trump said he was in New York City and would see the attorney general “for a continuation of the greatest Witch Hunt in US history! My great company, and myself, are being attacked from all sides. Banana Republic !”

Trump’s two eldest children, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, recently testified in the civil probe. NBC News reported Trump Jr. was interviewed a couple of weeks ago and Ivanka spoke to investigators last week. Neither of them pleaded the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination. Sources did not confirm whether their testimony took place in person or virtually.

Earlier this week, Cushman & Wakefield, a commercial real estate firm that appraised several Trump Organization properties, handed over nearly 36,000 documents to the attorney general.

The deposition comes in the wake of the FBI searching Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago in Florida, with a source familiar with the matter telling NBC News that the search was tied to classified information Trump allegedly took with him from the White House to his Palm Beach resort in January 2021.

rebecca shabad contributed.

Categories
US

More migrant buses arrive in New York City, days after Mayor Eric Adams scolded Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Authorities in New York City were on hand for the arrival of another group of migrants who were bussed from Texas after they crossed into the US from Mexico.

Three migrant buses arrived in NYC early morning Wednesday, following the path of the group of 50 migrants who were bussed to the same area on Friday, August 5.

The buses arrived just days after New York City Mayor Eric Adams criticized Texas Gov. Greg Abbott during a press conference on Sunday regarding the mass transit of migrant groups out of Texas and into New York.

Texas has sent thousands of migrants from the border state into Washington, DC, New York City, and other areas.

NYC MAYOR ERIC ADAMS BLASTS TEXAS GOV. GREG ABBOTT AFTER SECOND BUS OF MIGRANTS ARRIVES: ‘THIS IS HORRIFIC’

Migrants wave as they depart bus in New York City from Texas.

Migrants wave as they depart bus in New York City from Texas.
(FoxNews)

While awaiting the arrival of the three new buses early Wednesday, NYC’s Office of Immigrant Affairs Commissioner Manuel Castro accused a “morally corrupt” Abbott of using the bussing of migrants to the Big Apple as a “political ploy” aimed to “foment anti-immigrant sentiment.”

“You cannot take the words of Governor Abbott seriously. He’s demonstrated his moral character with these actions, and they’re disgusting. We do know that people are arriving with a large amount of needs because of the treatment they’ve received in the state of Texas,” Castro said outside The New York Times building in Manhattan. “Again, this must be condemned. This must be looked into. And our federal government will… take steps to hold them accountable.”

“No one is blaming them, but we are condemning this Governor Abbott’s treatment,” he said. “If he wanted to help, he would be bussing them to the actual locations that they need to… meet, to be transported to. But he’s not. He’s transporting people to Washington, DC and to New York City without any communication with us, with the intent of forcing as much harm as possible to our cities.”

Migrants greeted Wednesday morning by volunteers in New York City as they leave bus sent by Texas.

Migrants greeted Wednesday morning by volunteers in New York City as they leave bus sent by Texas.
(FoxNews)

At a press conference on Tuesday, Adams threatened to take a busload of New Yorkers to Texas to door knock and help get Abbott out of office for the “good of America,” before then calling for more federal funding to address the influx of migrants to the Big Apple sanctuary city.

“This is horrific when you think about what the governor is doing,” Adams said.

“We’re finding that some of the families are on the bus that wanted to go to other locations, and they were not allowed to do so,” the New York City mayor added. “They were forced on the bus with the understanding that they were going to other locations that they wanted to go to, and when they tried to explain they were not allowed to do so.”

Fox News’ Bill Melugin reported that Adams is calling for federal help because he says 4,000 migrants have arrived in the Big Apple in the last three months.

Melugin pointed out that Texas averages 4,000 migrants crossing its border every day.

FIRST TEXAS BUS OF MIGRANTS ARRIVES IN NYC

Abbott began sending migrants out of his state into liberal cities — thousands of thousands from the US-Mexico border — as a way to bring evidence of the migrant crisis to their doorstep and to bring attention to the issue of illegal immigration in his own state.

“Because of President Biden’s continued refusal to acknowledge the crisis caused by his open border policies, the State of Texas has had to take unprecedented action to keep our communities safe,” Abbott said Friday.

Migrants get off bus Wednesday morning in New York City.

Migrants get off bus Wednesday morning in New York City.
(FoxNews)

“In addition to Washington, DC, New York City is the ideal destination for these migrants, who can receive the abundance of city services and housing that Mayor Eric Adams has boasted about within the sanctuary city,” the Texas governor added. “I hope he follows through on his promise of welcoming all migrants with open arms so that our overrun and overwhelmed border towns can find relief.”

Texas has sent over 5,100 migrants to Washington DC, a surge that caused Mayor Muriel Bowser to activate the District of Columbia National Guard.

TEXAS KEEPS PRESSURE ON DC AS MORE MIGRANT BUSES ARRIVE NEAR US CAPITOL

The last group of migrants was sent to the nation’s capital last week and more can be expected, Abbott suggested.

“Believe me, we have more buses headed their way as we speak right now. But this just shows the hypocrisy of these liberal leaders up in the northeast who think that border crisis created by Joe Biden, that is fine as long as it’s Texas that has to deal with it,” Abbott said.

A fourth migrant bus from Texas arrived in Washington, DC, near the US Capitol, Saturday, April 16, 2022.

A fourth migrant bus from Texas arrived in Washington, DC, near the US Capitol, Saturday, April 16, 2022.
(Caitlin McFall/Fox News Digital)

“But as soon as they have to deal with it the real confidence of the crisis, they are up in arms calling for the national guard as you point out dealing with just a tiny fraction of what we had to deal with every single day,” I have added. “We’re going to keep sending those buses up there until they fully understand and most importantly — until the Biden administration does its job to enforce the laws concerning the border.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Abbott has invited Adams to the border to witness the immigration crisis, but Adams has declined.

Fox News’ Bradford Betz and Timothy HJ Nerozzi contributed to this report.