Business – Page 10 – Michmutters
Categories
Business

Buyer drops $1.81 million on Ormond house she admired for decades

The Ormond sale came amid a hot and cold Melbourne auction market, where some homes are selling for more than expected while others pass in.

There were 558 auctions scheduled in Melbourne on Saturday. By evening, Domain Group recorded a preliminary clearance rate of 62.4 per cent from 420 reported results, while 43 auctions were withdrawn. Withdrawn auctions are counted as unsold properties when calculating the clearance rate.

This is the first time Melbourne’s preliminary auction clearance rate has been above 60 per cent this winter. A clearance rate above 60 per cent is considered a balanced market, and the last time Melbourne exceeded this threshold was on May 28 at 63.7 per cent.

In Croydon, a four-bedroom home sold to a family moving from Vermont for $1.2 million, after they beat a local real estate agent for the keys.

The modern home at 51 Wicklow Avenue sold at the top of the price guide of $1.1 million to $1.2 million.

Bidding opened at $950,000, with a quick succession of offers taking the price to $1.1 million, before the increments fell to $20,000 and $5000.

McGrath Croydon principal agent Paul Fenech said the vendor, who had owned the property since 2015 and had built another property at the back of the block, was happy with the sale.

Fenech said while properties in the higher end of the market were selling, others were finding it tougher as interest rates rise.

“A lot of buyers who don’t need to buy right now are holding off because they think it [prices] will drop more,” Fenech said. “Younger buyers are the ones who are making lower offers – like $10,000 lower – because they’re worried about the interest rate rises.”

North of the city in Essendon, a buyer who made the winning bid of $2.31 million on a four-bedroom house at 42 Forrester Street, is now planning to tear down and rebuild on the block.

Nelson Alexander Essendon partner David Vaughan said five bidders competed at the sale, and the winner bid even though they had not been taken through the home until auction day.

“The buyer just rolled up on the day and took a quick look inside before the auction,” Vaughan said. “There were a few other developers that jumped in, so it turned out to be a big auction with a big crowd.”

In Brunswick East, a fully renovated terrace home at 123 Barkly Street sold under the hammer for $2.19 million to a young family looking to upsize to the area. They were one of two similar parties at the auction of the four-bedder.

Nelson Alexander Carlton North selling agent Charlie Barham said despite negative reports on the market, well renovated homes were still getting good prices.

Those that needed work were more difficult to sell as building costs rose and builders became scarce on the ground, he said.

“Building costs are one thing, but trying to find a builder who’s available is very tough,” Barham said.

The auction was across the road from a house that sold last weekend at 110 Barkly Street, where the buyers spent $1,500,500 on a terrace that had scope for renovation.

Not all homes sold under the hammer. A Greensborough house passed in, then sold directly after for $710,000.

The three-bedroom fixer upper at 5 Russell Street drew two bidders but passed in on an offer of $695,000.

Morrison Kleeman Greensborough auctioneer Mark Walker said the home needed a major renovation making it a tougher sale.

“It needs a hell of a lot of work and is not profitable in its current state,” Walker said.

The buyer who was in the building industry would be looking to fix up the home themselves, he said.

70 Queen Street, Reservoir was a time capsule.

70 Queen Street, Reservoir was a time capsule.Credit:Ray White Reservoir

loading

A time capsule in Reservoir also did not sell under the hammer. The three-bedroom home at 70 Queen Street had a $1.2 million guide, but passed in a vendor’s bid of $1 million.

Ray White Reservoir selling agent Matthew Clark said buyers’ agents were negotiating with interested buyers on Saturday, hoping to finalize a sale.

“It could still sell today, or early next week,” Clark said.

Categories
Business

‘Realistic’ sellers cut reserve for Marrickville house by $95,000

The pair said they were looking for the right place rather than timing the market.

“We were really just waiting for the right place to come along… [interest rates] obviously plays into it. That’s a factor for everyone right now. We definitely have that in mind, but we’re pretty happy,” Charmaine said.

Raine&Horne Marrickville’s Filippo D’Arrigo said the auction went to plan with four expected registered bidders on the day and reasonable vendors, who were also upgrading.

The two-bedroom house in Marrickville was initially guided $1.45 million then revised upwards to $1.5 million after buyer feedback.

The two-bedroom house in Marrickville was initially guided $1.45 million then revised upwards to $1.5 million after buyer feedback.Credit:Rhett Wyman

“The vendors were realistic. There were no doubts when we asked the question [of reducing the reserve],” D’Arrigo said. “They were listening to the market and happy to go through the process.

“Today was a true representation of a good quality home. It was a real family home and there were people who wanted to buy it.”

The home last traded for $1.48 million in 2017, records show.

Marrickville’s median house price grew 24.4 per cent to $1.97 million in the year to June on Domain data.

In Double Bay, a cashed-up local downsizer picked up a one-bedroom unit for $2,005,000.

Six of the eight registered buyers placed a bid on G01/8 Patterson Street, which opened at $1.52 million.

Despite falling short of the $1.6 million guide, McGrath Paddington’s Georgia Cleary said the property was on the market within three bids, surpassing the $1.58 million reserve.

Clearly said the standout result was ultimately down to the property’s quality.

“If there is a point of difference then that is reflected in the price … in a normal market you see the better properties getting better prices, which should be the way,” she said, adding that the boom six months ago was “artificial” and could never last.

“This is a more sustainable market, and it’s better for buyers and sellers. There is a lot of local money and local interest to buy property.”

Double Bay’s median unit price grew 19.8 per cent to $2 million in the year to June.

In Concord, a young couple with triplets bought a 1950s art deco full brick house for just shy of $4 million with plans to build their dream home.

Four out of the seven registered buyers placed bids on 4 Sanders Parade, which had no price guide.

The auction was quick to start at $3 million and the handbrakes went up at $3.9 million, where the agents and Cooley’s auctioneer Michael Garofolo said they had to “really earn our keep”.

loading

The vendors eventually reduced their $4 million reserve and the highest bidders and sellers met at the final price of $3.94 million.

“The market is still there, buyers are still there; as long as you’re realistic, you’re selling,” Garofolo said.

“That’s still a premium price, we have to get our heads out of the clouds from six months ago. Yes, the market has come back, but it hasn’t fallen off a cliff.”

In Lane Cove West, a local family purchased a three-bedroom property that hit the market for the first time in over seven decades for $2.45 million as an investment.

The successful buyers outbid six other registered parties, including two online bidders who kicked off the auction for 34 Wood Street at $2 million.

The Agency North’s Shane Slater said the buyers were planning to do a minor renovation to rent it out before moving in after a few years.

“They’re going to do paint and carpets, a bit of a tidy up then rent it out for the next three to five years,” Slater said.

loading

“It’s really sought after. Six months ago, it probably would have gone for $2.6 million. These people are pretty astute buyers now, jumping in now to get it at that price.”

The reserve was $2.2 million.

Categories
Business

Melbourne woman injured after slipping on lettuce at Coles in Wyndham Vale loses appeal

Coles shopper who SUED the supermarket after slipping on a LETTUCE LEAF in the aisles loses court battle despite claiming she ‘suffered a whole person impairment’

  • Coles shopper who slipped on lettuce has lost her legal bid for compensation
  • Kanwaleen Bhelley claims she injured her knee and back in the fall in May 2020
  • Medical panel ruled she didn’t meet threshold required for compensation
  • She lodged an appeal to the court, alleging panel made jurisdictional errors
  • Victoria’s Supreme Court ruled in favor of panel and dismissed appeal

A Melbourne woman who claimed she injured her knee and back after she slipped on a piece of lettuce during a trip to the supermarket has lost her legal bid for compensation.

Kanwaleen Bhelley, 43, claimed she suffered a whole person impairment (WPI) of more than five per cent following the order at a Coles store at Wyndham Vale in May 2020.

Ms Bhelley’s medical reports supporting her claim that her impairment from the fall exceeded five per cent were rejected by the supermarket giant, which referred the case to a medical panel which assessed her in 2021.

The panel found Ms Bhelley suffered age-related degenerative changes to her spine and sacroiliac joints associated with rehabilitation treatment of her right knee.

The panel ruled her condition was stable and that she didn’t meet the WPI threshold required for compensation.

A Melbourne woman who slipped on lettuce at a Coles store at Wyndham Vale had her bid for compensation dismissed

A Melbourne woman who slipped on lettuce at a Coles store at Wyndham Vale had her bid for compensation dismissed

Ms Bhelley lodged an appeal against the decision in the Victorian Supreme Court, alleging the panel made jurisdictional errors.

‘In particular, she alleges that, in finding that her injuries did not satisfy the threshold level, the Panel either did not apply the Guides; mistook or misapplied the provisions of the Guides; or made a finding that was not open to it, or which was unreasonable,’ court documents state.

‘Mrs Bhelley submitted that, absent such error, the panel would have determined that her degree of whole person impairment resulting from her spinal injury was 5%, satisfying the significant injury threshold and in turn entitling her to claim noneconomic loss damages.’

Ms Bhelley claimed her injuries from the supermarket fall in 2020 caused pain, restricted her movement and limited her attendance at concerts and her temple.

Kanwaleen Bhelley claimed she suffered injuries to her back and right knee after slipping on a piece of lettuce at Coles (stock image)

Kanwaleen Bhelley claimed she suffered injuries to her back and right knee after slipping on a piece of lettuce at Coles (stock image)

She also alleged she could only drive for about an hour before experiencing lower back pain and did not run in fear of causing pain to her right knee.

‘She can stand for about 10 minutes before she has to stretch her back,’ the panel wrote in their report.

‘She can walk for about 30 minutes, (but) after about 500m she notices mild right knee pain, so stops walking to sit or stand for about 10 minutes.’

‘She can traverse stairs without difficulty, using alternate stair treads for both ascending and descending, with no lower back or right knee issues.’

Judge Andrea Tsalamandris acknowledged Ms Bhelley could still be suffering symptoms or complaints since the fall two years ago.

But she ruled the panel had not erred in their assessment and dismissed Ms Bhelley’s appeal when she handed down her judgment on Friday.

‘It was open to the panel to determine that Ms Bhelley’s complaints and symptoms were most appropriately categorized,’ Judge Tsalamandris wrote.

‘I am not satisfied that there was a jurisdictional error made by the panel, and therefore dismiss this application.’

A shopper has lost her legal bid for compensation from Coles (stock image of a Coles store)

A shopper has lost her legal bid for compensation from Coles (stock image of a Coles store)

advertisement

.

Categories
Business

Winning bets? Meme stock frenzy of 2021 makes a return | stock markets

Just like double denim, it seems some trends never really die. After flaming out in spectacular fashion last year, the meme stock frenzy of 2021 has made a return.

In recent weeks the share price of troubled retailers Bed Bath & Beyond and GameStop and the cinema chain AMC Entertainment have once again soared.

This may sound all too familiar. Last year all three companies were at the center of a meme-fueled “revolution” in investing as Gen Z and millennial investors piled into the stocks having apparently spotted something Wall Street had missed. GameStop shares rose from $3.25 in April 2020 to $347.50 in late January 2021 – a rise of 10,692%.

Many small investors then felt like they had hedge funds and big institutional investors on the run. Indeed, the frenzy came close to bankrupting a number of hedge funds. It didn’t last. By February the meme stock craze was unraveling and older heads were smugly smiling again.

Now the tide has turned again. Between late July and early last week, shares of Bed Bath & Beyond, a home goods store that has decidedly seen better days, had more than doubled. Movie-theater operator AMC Entertainment saw a similar bounce, while GameStop – the struggling US computer games retail company and perhaps the most baffling of that era’s stock darlings – bumped up close to 25%.

None of the three are considered winning bets in any conventional sense, and the rise in Bed Bath & Beyond came days before its stock was downgraded by the ratings agency Baird. “This frenzied move has been driven by non-fundamentally focused market participants,” Baird analyst Justin Kleber wrote in a note to clients.

This time, the battle may not be between younger day-traders flush with government stimulus checks and informed by online forums like Reddit’s WallStreetBets. Although social media chatter surrounding the stocks has increased, dueling hedge funds are also playing a part.

“Non-fundamentally focused market participants” is an apt way to describe traders at the height of the pandemic meme-stock frenzy. That time around the Reddit board was filled with memes about traders with “diamond hands” – unafraid to take bets against conventional wisdom.

This time too there are parts of Reddit’s investment community that are all in on the rally. Last week a user under the name of TheDude0007 explained on WallStreetBets that “this run is just beginning” and name-checked Ryan Cohen, founder of e-commerce company Chewy and chair of GameStop.

Cohen, known as a “meme-lord” for his influence over investors, was one of GameStop’s original boosters before taking on his chair. His meme-filled posts about him are scrutinized by his fans about him – even when they are almost impossible to decipher. In February last year, I tweeted a picture of a McDonald’s ice-cream cone alongside a frog emoji, sending traders on a search to decode its meaning. GameStop’s stock finished the trading day up 104%.

But according to an analysis by Bloomberg, the meme-stock return is evidence that they have unusually explosive properties. So many investors have bet that the shares in all these companies are worth zero, argues Jared Dillian, editor and publisher of the Daily Dirtnap. But the fact is that – as with any asset – they are worth what people will pay for them. As a result, stock prices of troubled companies can explode upwards at any moment if investors will pay more. “On Wall Street they call trying to profit despite this as ‘picking up nickels in front a steamroller’,” he writes.

According to Ihor Dusaniwsky, managing director at S3 Partners, the movement of the meme stocks is not coming from the Reddit board traders but from larger retail investors and the meme-traders are in a sense along for the ride.

“There isn’t a fundamental reason for a lot of these price moves,” Dusaniwsky told the Guardian. “A lot of it is fomo [fear of missing out] on the rally.”

One clue that this rally is different comes from the last is Robinhood. Once the favorite trading platform of meme traders, Robinhood is in trouble. As stock markets fell and Covid stimulus cash dried up, so did Robinhood’s business. Its number of active users has dropped from 22 million to 14 million, and its stock trades at around $10 after cresting at close to $60 a year ago after it went public.

Last week, Robinhood announced it would lay off 23% of its staff after it posted a 44% decline in revenues. CEO Vladimir Tenev said in a blogpost that the company had been hit by “deterioration of the macro environment, with inflation at 40-year highs accompanied by a broad crypto market crash”.

This time the meme-stock trading is spread across larger trading platforms, including Charles Schwab and E*Trade. That said, Robinhood – and Reddit – still offer clues to why these fundamentally troubled companies are hot again, Dusaniwsky said. “With Robinhood you get an idea of ​​what that cohort of traders are doing and that’s a good proxy for the rest of the market,” said Dusaniwsky.

“It’s really the same type of people – the same mentality. These guys are momentum traders, they’re not looking at the underlying fundamentals. They’re looking at riding the tide in and out, and it’s worked because the market is trending. The problem comes when the market doesn’t trend, and you get taken out to sea.”

Categories
Business

Mercedes Formula E Team e-bike review

Mercedes has jumped into the electric bike scene with its recent releases of multiple luxury e-bikes. And with the popularity of personal electric vehicles, ie electric scooters, bikes and Segways, the luxurious new product could be the route for those who are seeking to ditch petrol with style.

Interestingly, when it comes to e-bikes and especially e-scooters, I see a lot of people assuming that it’s a lazy mode of transport. And originally, in my mind, buying an e-bike just seemed like a stepped-down, less impressive, motorbike.

However, e-bikes aren’t that comparable to a motorbike and they’re not as lazy as you might think. In fact, with all Australian e-bikes you’re required to pedal while accelerating. And so it turns out an e-bike is more like a regular bike, with some exercise still involved, but you get that extra bit of oomph to take you further and up the hills you’d usually avoid.

With the Mercedes Formula E Team e-bike, in collaboration with N+ Bikes, it seems the up-market car company hopes to bring the luxury of its brand to the e-bike experience. Mercedes says it offers “style and quality with European engineering”. And at first glance I was certainly impressed with the silhouette of the bike.

It has an alluring, slim profile, even though the battery is completely hidden inside the frame, unlike other e-bikes which have an obvious chonk strapped to the side or squeezed under the seat.

It’s only when you look at the chain-ring and the bike’s cassette (ie. the pedally bits) that you notice some extra thickness, which visually gives away that this isn’t a regular bike.

In fact there’s a fully integrated drive train (the chain part of the bike) and being a carbon belt drive, it offers constant variable transmission, which is pretty fancy for a bike. This means that in comparison to a regular bike chain there aren’t any clunky gear changes, especially as you pump the acceleration.

Additionally, the bike has puncture resistant tires and hydraulic brakes, so you’re getting some fairly premium features here.

The bike is made of Aluminum 6061, weighs in at 20kg, and looks sleek in its single matt black colourway. Its top speed is 25km and its range is 70km on a charge. It takes three-and-a-half hours to charge up to 100 per cent. You’ll see a lot of this info on the LCD display while you’re riding, as it’s integrated into the center of the handlebars and is also pin-code protected (on start-up) for security.

Although still a little heavy, the bike itself is surprisingly manoeuvrable while riding and definitely has the smooth gear change as expected, along with a decent kick speed when required.

It oozes quality manufacturing, however, the one accessory it’s surprisingly missing are headlights and tail lights, and coming from a car brand I feel like this is a funny oversight.

But that’s a simple fix and I’ve seen other user reviews mentioning that “although it was strange they didn’t include lights”, the bike still exceeded their expectations.

Although I can admire the design, this e-bike has definitely been created with blokes in mind who have some cash to splash. The seat is classically tiny, hard and skinny which you see on bikes marketed to men. So as it stands, with my preference of a wider, cushioned seat, I can’t see myself taking it out on super long rides.

I suppose it’s race-car style though, which goes along with the theme, and it was an awesome bike to try out nonetheless. Aside from that, my test model was a little tall for my short stature. However, there are three different frame sizes which allow people from around 5ft 4” all the way up to 6ft 6” to ride. Though apparently this bike is specifically “optimized for riders over 165cm” (5ft 4”).

At the end of the day e-bikes are great at getting people of any fitness level out and about and you’ll find yourself becoming a little more adventurous, riding new places that maybe you would’ve avoided before. And because you can’t just accelerate mindlessly, you still burn some calories even if you’re cruising along.

A Mercedes e-bike will set you back double the cost of a regular e-bike at $4928. But if you want the best in class and have the cash then the Mercedes bike is certainly worth a look.

Elly Awesome is an Aussie tech and lifestyle vlogger | @ellyawesometech | Youtube

.

Categories
Business

Cost of living: Product ‘shrinkflation’ tipped to continue as shoppers warned to ‘get used to’ higher costs

We’ve all been hearing a lot about inflation but it’s shrinkflation that shoppers really need to worry about.

Shrinkflation is where manufacturers charge the same or even more for smaller servings, betting on most consumers not noticing the difference.

And with rate rises and cost-of-living pressures hitting many hard households, these reductions are offering less and less value for money

Consumer group Choice has been getting tip-offs from peeved Aussies about products that have been downsizing, recently verifying Smith’s crinkle cut potato chips had been trimmed by 5g — or about three chips — to 170g per pack.

Shrinkflation is where manufacturers charge the same or even more for smaller servings, betting on most consumers not noticing the difference.
Camera IconShrinkflation is where manufacturers charge the same or even more for smaller servings, betting on most consumers not noticing the difference. Credit: The West Australian

There has also been a 20g drop in large packs of Red Rock Deli potato chips to 165g and boxes of Crunchy Nut Corn Flakes have shed 30g.

And sweet-toothed shoppers have been left with a sour taste with Cadbury family-sized chocolate blocks going from the once-standard 250g to 180g.

The latest to drop weight is Maltesers, with a spokeswoman for manufacturer Mars Wrigley saying it was “facing unprecedented cost pressures” like many Australian businesses.

“From time to time, external factors make it necessary for product changes so that we can continue to ensure the availability of our products to all Australians,” she said.

Choice spokesman Liam Kennedy said shrinkflation was a global trend that was expected to continue.

“Most of the examples that we see, a lot of the tips we receive, are in that snack area, cereals,” Mr Kennedy told The West Australian.

But it has hit pet food too, with bags of Purina One cat food contracting by 100g to 1.4kg but costing more.

Choice says 'shrinkflation' is a global trend expected to continue.
Camera IconChoice says ‘shrinkflation’ is a global trend expected to continue. Credit: Rebecca Le May/The West Australian

Owner Nestle blamed that on recipe changes and higher costs for raw materials, packaging and transport, Mr Kennedy said.

“A lot of business are feeling that right now,” he added.

Elizabeth Jackson, a food supply chain systems expert at Curtin University, warned shoppers to expect ongoing pain at the checkout, mainly due to high transport costs, saying the current inflation spike was reminiscent of that seen in the oil crisis of 1973.

.

Categories
Business

Investing, tax, super, property: Money mistakes 40-somethings make

Your 40s is an exciting time when it comes to wealth building, as this is the time most people reach the tipping point on their journey to financial independence.

But you have to get it right. If you don’t, you’ll be playing catch-up in future years and likely will need to make sacrifices.

In this piece, I cover the key money areas you should be focused on in your 40s to drive success.

Automate your saving success

Your 40s will be close to your peak earning years, and will likely be your peak borrowing years, so being on top of your savings and cashflow is important.

From a savings perspective, when you’re earning bigger dollars the difference between doing OK and doing great is huge. If you don’t already have a good savings system in place, now is the time to make it happen.

You should be looking to automate your money management, have all your bills and commitments provided for and paid without you having to think about them, and to have your savings building automatically.

Having a good savings system is important so you’re crystal clear on how much money you have available to direct wealth building strategies. Particularly given your 40s are likely to be your peak potential borrowing years, having total clarity on your “free cash” number will give you the confidence to take full advantage of your ability to grow wealth through borrowing.

investment

By the time you get to your 40s, you should already have some good experience with investing and have a foundation of quality investments in place. If not, this should be your first priority.

There are a lot of different opinions (and ways to be right) on the best way to invest, but the statistics show us that passive index funds perform best 95 per cent of the time. My view is that passive investments are an extremely effective way to build wealth while minimizing risk.

If you’re really drawn to interesting investments (read: crypto, start-ups, etc), with higher potential returns and higher risk, it’s important in your 40s you have clear boundaries for how much of your portfolio you want to hold in these sort of riskier investments.

My view is that you probably don’t want to hold more than 10 per cent of your investments in this bucket, and skipping them altogether to focus on the more boring but highly effective investments like index funds will serve you well.

Property

Your 40s are going to be your peak borrowing years, with higher incomes and a long time until retirement age (as defined by the banks and lenders).

Risk management is critical, but in my opinion leverage is a highly effective way to build wealth relatively quickly – and something you should look to go “all in” on in your 40s.

I’m not saying you need to rush out and buy 20 properties, but having a good quality investment property, or properties, behind you in your 40s will do some magic in future years.

It’s important when you’re borrowing at higher levels that your plan around this is rock solid – you don’t want to be caught out by higher interest rates, rental vacancies, or unexpected expenses that can throw a spanner in the works.

If you’re going down this path, take the time to map out your game plan and consider investing in some good quality financial advice so you know all your bases are covered and that you can execute and drive the results you want with confidence.

tax

In your 40s tax planning can mean the difference between success and mediocrity. Your income (and marginal tax rate) will be higher, and you’ll have more investments behind you generating taxable income that needs to be dealt with.

Having a smart tax strategy will pay big dividends.

You’ll want to look at where and how you’re holding your investments, if you’re part of a couple, who should own which investments, how to leverage the concessional tax rates in super, and whether you’ll benefit from using tax structures like trusts and investment companies.

You should also be looking at tax strategies like debt recycling, super contributions, and harnessing the power of franked dividends to cut your tax bill and boost your after-tax investing return.

Every dollar of tax you save is an extra dollar you can direct back to your wealth building, ultimately helping you get ahead faster and easier.

Super

The effort you put into super in your 40s will be a big driver of your success in future years.

With a higher income and (relatively) limited time to retirement, you should be looking to maximize the tax deductible “concessional” contributions to super every year. The current limit for these contributions is $27,500 including money contributed by your employer.

If you haven’t been maximizing your super contributions in previous years, you can also “catch up” on up to five years worth of contributions, generating some serious tax deductions and getting a heap of money into the low tax super environment.

Maximizing your super contributions through your 40s will ensure you go into your 50s with a solid amount of investments behind you that can grow well over the decades to come.

Insurance

In your 40s your income and financial commitments will likely be at their highest levels, and because you still have some time to reach the typical retirement age, it’s likely you’re still heavily reliant on your income to get you to where you want to be .

I get that most people don’t like and often don’t trust insurance, but in my opinion this is something everyone should have until they’ve reached complete financial security.

Income replacement insurance premiums are tax deductible, and having this cover in place will give you peace of mind that the unexpected isn’t going to sabotage your money success.

Be aware that not all insurance is made the same, and cheapest is definitely not best when it comes to protecting your wealth. Insurance is incredibly complicated and can be confusing, so if you’re considering putting insurance cover into place you’ll benefit from getting some good advice.

The wrap

Your financial potential is still yet to be unleashed in your 40s, and the work you put in here will dictate how far you can go in future years. But it won’t just happen on its own – you need to be firmly in the driver’s seat here.

You should go into your 40s with a solid plan, revisit it regularly, and keep your focus as you move forward achieving your money milestones.

Ben Nash is a finance expert commentator, podcaster, financial adviser and founder of Pivot Wealth www.pivotwealth.com.au, and Author of the Amazon best-selling book ‘Get Unstuck: Your guide to creating a life not limited by money’.

Ben has just launched a series of free online money education events to help you get on the front financial foot. You can check out all the details and book your place here.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is general in nature and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Therefore, you should consider whether the information is appropriate to your

.

Categories
Business

From next year, Johnson & Johnson baby powder sold in Australia will no longer contain talc — what’s the new ingredient?

Johnson & Johnson has announced it will stop selling talc-based baby powder in Australia in 2023, as it transitions its popular, but controversial, global product to a cornstarch base.

In a statement to the ABC, a company spokesperson said while its talc-based range would be discontinued globally, cornstarch-based powder was already being sold in Australia.

“As part of a worldwide portfolio assessment, we have made the commercial decision to transition to an all corn starch-based baby powder portfolio,” it said.

.

Categories
Business

Vauxhall Corsa in Dovecot, Liverpool plastered with angry notes for ‘selfish, idiotic parking’

Furious homeowner plasters ‘selfish’ driver’s Vauxhall Corsa with ‘idiotic parking’ notes after ‘stupid’ motorist ‘blocks in a bulging skip that was due to be collected’

  • An raging homeowner has called out a driver’s ‘selfish idiotic parking’
  • Notes claimed car, parked in Liverpool, blocked a skip from being collected
  • Skip owner said rebooking the collection time would cost hundreds of pounds
  • At least 13 angry notes typed on A4 paper were duct-taped onto the vehicle
  • But social media users were divided over whether the action was right or wrong

A raging homeowner has claimed a driver blocked their ‘bulging skip’ from being collected, branding them ‘selfish’ after it cost them hundreds of pounds to book a recollection.

The black Vauxhall Corsa is thought to have parked in an awkward position preventing the skip from being picked up from a residential street in Dovecot, Liverpool.

The furious skip owner went on to plaster the car with the same angry message that warned against ‘selfish idiotic parking’.

More than 13 sheets of A4 paper with the message printed on were stuck on the car’s windscreen and windows with duct tape.

But after the incident was revealed on Twitter, users on social media were divided over whether the action was right or wrong.

The black Vauxhall Corsa, parked in Dovecot, Liverpool, was plastered with angry A4 notes calling out the 'selfish, idiotic parking'.  The car is thought to have parked awkwardly blocking a skip collection which the homeowner said cost hundreds of pounds to rebook.

The black Vauxhall Corsa, parked in Dovecot, Liverpool, was plastered with angry A4 notes calling out the ‘selfish, idiotic parking’. The car is thought to have parked awkwardly blocking a skip collection which the homeowner said cost hundreds of pounds to rebook.

The angry note read: ‘Selfish idiotic parking! Parking right next to a bulging skip that’s due to be collected today has cost me a lot of time and money.

‘At 0803hrs this morning you parked in front of my property blocking an obviously bulging skip that was due to be collected today.

‘I have spent hours knocking on every house and asking in the shop about the owner.

‘It is now 1400hrs and it’s still blocking the skip; I will now have to pay extra charges because of your selfish stupidity.’

The angry note said: 'Parking right next to a bulging skip that's due to be collected today has cost me a lot of time and money.'  At the bottom the skip owner warned the driver to never park in front of his home again.

The angry note said: ‘Parking right next to a bulging skip that’s due to be collected today has cost me a lot of time and money.’ At the bottom the skip owner warned the driver to never park in front of his home again.

People on social media, however, have been left divided over who is in the right and who is in the wrong.

One person wrote: ‘It’s not illegal to park in front of somebody’s property.’

Another added: ‘People who think they own the road outside their house are hilarious in fairness.’

People on social media have been divided over whether the skip owner is in the right or the wrong.

People on social media have been divided over whether the skip owner is in the right or the wrong.

Some people pointed out that the duct tape stuck on the car window and windscreen could cause damage.

One said: ‘If that tape peeled the clear coat off my car I’d be f*****g ranging.’

Another added: ‘I’d be knocking on his property informing him he needs to remove that tape … defo grounds for criminal damage if it f***s with the paint.’

Others pointed out the posters taped to the car's window and windscreen could cause damage to its coat.

Others pointed out the posters taped to the car’s window and windscreen could cause damage to its coat.

Others showed sympathy for the homeowner, agreeing that the driver should have parked in a more considerate way.

One woman said: ‘They have a point to be fair, if it is a driveway, if they’re an on-call health professional someone could be in a lot of trouble by the time they get there.’

Another man added: ‘How about don’t be ap***k and park in front of someone’s drive?’

Others felt sorry for the skip owner and said the driver was in the wrong for parking in awkward position.  The homeowner said booking the skip recollection cost hundreds of pounds.

Others felt sorry for the skip owner and said the driver was in the wrong for parking in awkward position. The homeowner said booking the skip recollection cost hundreds of pounds.

Selina Flowers on Facebook said: ‘People really need to be more aware when parking their car, park where you wish as long as its legal but being aware of your surroundings is common courtesy.

‘Now they have a bill for paint work.’

Kevin Foster added: ‘Why not give the car owner the bill from the skip company for the so-called extra money it has cost the homeowner.

‘Normally it’s a pay on the collection of the skip, if the wagon can’t pick it up then it’s not the homeowners fault it’s the car owner for blocking it.’

Some called on the car owner to pay the bill for recollection of the 'bulging skip' while others said people need to be more aware of where they are parking.

Some called on the car owner to pay the bill for recollection of the ‘bulging skip’ while others said people need to be more aware of where they are parking.

Some found the situation laughable.

One woman said: ‘Nothing could make me this embarrassingly angry.’

Another man added: ‘Should’ve just put it in the skip, probably where all Corsas belong to be fair.

‘I’m mildly disappointed he didn’t run out of toner in the printer and then subsequently printed off more to tell the person they now owe them for the toner and fuel to go to the shop and buy it.’

advertisement

.

Categories
Business

‘Stealth mode’: how Disney overtook Netflix in streaming wars | Disney+

Yot might have taken the Walt Disney company less than three years to overtake Netflix in streaming subscribers, but its road to domination started more than 15 years ago with a carefully planned $100bn (£81bn) strategy to reinvigorate its empire for 21st century viewers.

The combination of Netflix priming a global audience for the streaming era and the serendipitous launch of Disney+ at the start of the pandemic, a service populated with crown jewel franchises such as Star Wars and Marvel, transformed what had been viewed as Disney’s late move disadvantage into unprecedented breakneck growth.

Just 16 months after launch, a bargain-priced Disney+ hit 100 million subscribers – a feat Netflix took a decade to accomplish – and combined with the US streaming services Hulu and ESPN+, the company has now edged ahead with 222 million subscribers.

When it comes to winning the global streaming war, content is king. Disney, the owner of the most successful Hollywood film and TV studio in history, is the home of many of the world’s biggest and most-coveted franchises and characters thanks to a multibillion dollar buying spree that started in the noughties.

A still from the first Toy Story film in 1995.
A still from the first Toy Story film in 1995. Photograph: Walt Disney/Pixar/Sportsphoto/Allstar

In 2006, a year before Netflix made the pivot from DVDs by post to streaming that would ultimately revolutionize traditional TV viewing, Disney spent $7.4bn buying Apple founder Steve Jobs’s Pixar, the animation factory hit behind Toy Story, Finding Nemo and The Incredibles.

This was followed in 2009 by the surprise $4bn purchase of Marvel Comics’ superhero universe, bringing in a multitude of characters including Iron Man and Captain America, taking Disney into new live-action territory.

The third transformational buyout came when Disney snapped up George Lucas’s Lucasfilm, the production company behind the Star Wars and Indiana Jones franchises, for $4bn in 2012. In each case the deals were criticized by City investors, but it has been Disney which has been laughing all the way to the bank.

A still form Avengers: Endgame in 2019.
A still form Avengers: Endgame in 2019. Photograph: Everett Collection Inc/Alamy

In 2008, just before the launch of its first Marvel film – Iron Man starring Robert Downey Jr – Disney’s share price was about $15, valuing the business at $26bn. The world’s biggest entertainment company is now trading at $112 a share, giving it a market value of $205bn, almost twice that of Netflix.

“Disney has been successful in supplying a steady flow of high impact releases straight from the big screen while also expanding their franchises for streaming-only content,” said Richard Broughton, the executive director of the market research firm Ampere Analysis.

“Netflix just hasn’t had as many big franchise hits as they would have liked. Stranger Things has been the biggest, and to a lesser extent maybe The Witcher and The Crown, but they just don’t have assets the scale of Marvel, Star Wars or Pixar,” he added.

In 2018, the big players including Warner Bros and Comcast, which owns NBC Universal and Sky, began to stop licensing content to Netflix – and each other – in preparation of launching their own streaming services. Then Disney struck again, paying $71bn for Rupert Murdoch’s entertainment business 21st Century Fox.

The deal, which included the 20th Century Fox Hollywood film and TV studio and FX Network, added a plethora of crown jewel assets including Deadpool, Avatar, Titanic, The Simpsons and Modern Family.

It also included ownership of Fox’s Hotstar streaming service in India, with its tens of millions of subscribers, which flattered the growth rate of Disney+ when it launched in late 2019.

The service, which is expected to lose millions of customers as Disney loses the rights to air Indian Premier League cricket, accounts for 58.4 million of 152 million global Disney+ subscribers. However, the low-cost model means users pay on average just $1.20 a month.

The Mumbai Indians celebrate after defeating the Chennai Super Kings in the Indian Premier League final in 2019.
The Mumbai Indians celebrate after defeating the Chennai Super Kings in the Indian Premier League final in 2019. Photograph: Robert Cianflone/Getty Images

Disney is aggressively forecasting that Disney+ itself will overtake Netflix in 2024, as it remains in high growth mode. It added 14.4 million subscribers in the second quarter, beating analysts’ expectations, while Netflix struggled this year with its first loss of subscribers in a decade.

“In essence both companies are at different phases of growth,” said Paolo Pescatore, a media and telecoms analyst at PP Foresight. “Disney is still in startup stealth mode when it comes to direct to consumer services. There are still millions of users to acquire as Disney continues to expand into new markets and rolls out new blockbuster shows.”

While Netflix is ​​already available globally, bar China, Crimea, North Korea, Russia, and Syria, Disney+ is still in the process of international rollout. It recently announced its availability in a further 60 countries and territories.

Disney maintains Disney+ is on track to hit profitability in 2024, but staying on top is an extremely expensive business.

Competition for subscribers has ignited an unsustainable content war, at the same time as stretched household budgets have forced consumers to cut back on entertainment services. Netflix will spend about $17bn making and licensing films and TV shows this year, and has a further $23bn on its balance sheet for long-term content costs, plus $14.8bn in long-term debt.

Disney is spending $30bn on content across all its TV, film and streaming services this year, which includes expensive live sports rights such as NFL for ESPN. Disney said that since launch it had lost more than $7bn funding Disney+.

Sign up to the daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

After pursuing a bargain-priced strategy to drive growth, Disney is now following Netflix in instituting significant price increases, starting in the US, as investors’ focus shifts to costs and profitability.

Both companies will launch part advertising-funded subscription options in an attempt to appeal to more cost-conscious consumers as growth in subscribers and revenues in the global streaming market slows.

For now, Netflix remains the single biggest global streaming service, with analysts at Ampere predicting a longer timeline for Disney+ to achieve global parity.

“Disney’s growth will slow in the next few years,” says Broughton. “Factors include the loss of the Indian Premier League rights and the need to raise prices – our data suggests subscribers are now canceling entertainment services to cut costs – which will contribute to a similar slowdown as we are seeing at Netflix. We think that Disney+ and Netflix will about match one another as the world’s biggest services at 240 million global subscribers in 2027.”