When it broke the news, The Australian Financial Review‘s Street Talk column said the decision was “welcomed by a growing cohort of the firm’s lawyers who were increasingly uncomfortable with its work defending the church against child abuse claims”.
Younger lawyers in particular were uncomfortable with the connection and reluctant to do the work, and the firm believed this was also affecting Corrs’ appeal to graduates as it sought to rebrand itself as a top-tier commercial firm.
While Corrs only did compensation work for the Melbourne archdiocese, in Sydney it handled almost all its legal work, an account that rival law firm chief executives estimated to be worth at least $3 million.
The church was disappointed there was no prior consultation, and dismayed when the firm tried to cherry-pick the work it would do, especially as it has a long-time client in British American Tobacco.
Corrs also kept his partners in the dark, including Richard Leder, the church’s main contact at the firm for child abuse claims for more than 25 years.
Mr Leder was the architect of the Melbourne Response of 1996, the first compensation scheme in the world set up by a church. It is not clear whether he will join Dentons or keep working for the Melbourne archdiocese at another firm. He is unlikely to stay at Corrs.
Mr Digges, the Sydney Archdiocese’s executive director, administration and finance, said the church would “cease all engagement” with Corrs.
“We are thrilled to be partnering with an Australia-wide legal practice that has a trusted reputation of excellence, prudence and probity around the world,” Mr Digges said.
“The Catholic Church in Australia remains committed to continuing responsibility towards survivors of historical abuse, while also providing relief, reassurance and support to all of those currently struggling in society today.
“We would like to thank Corrs Chambers Westgarth for their service over the past 20 years.”
Doug Stipanicev, the chairman of Denton’s Australia, said the firm was “grateful to have demonstrated their suitability and commitment to the role”.
“With the Catholic Church being the country’s largest non-government provider of education, health, aged care and social services, we bring a diverse range of skills and experience needed to support the Archdiocese of Sydney.”
Corrs chief executive Gavin MacLaren has declined to answer any questions about why he asked the church to move all its abuse claims work to other law firms.
The most recent statement put out by the firm last Wednesday said “Corrs continues to act for the Catholic Church” and that “Richard Leder remains a partner at the firm”.
A court order that sought to bar enforcement of a dormant law criminalizing most abortions in Michigan does not apply to county prosecutors, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled Monday.
The massively consequential ruling means the 1931 law banning all abortions except those done to protect the life of a pregnant person essentially takes effect immediately, said David Kallman, an attorney for Great Lakes Justice Center, a conservative organization representing several Michigan prosecutors who challenged the injunction .
“We’re ecstatic. It’s wonderful. That’s exactly what we’ve been saying all along,” Kallman said Monday morning in a phone interview.
More:Michigan judge won’t step down from abortion case: Argument ‘border on frivolous’
More:Whitmer, Planned Parenthood lawsuits loom large in Michigan after high court overturns Roe
The decision could have a sweeping and drastic impact in the state, where Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Attorney General Dana Nessel and many other pro-abortion rights advocates have fought to maintain legal access to abortion following the US Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade in June.
The ruling is likely to prompt confusion and concern about access to abortion in Michigan, but abortion-rights advocates will almost assuredly try to appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court as soon as possible.
In a statement Monday, Planned Parenthood of Michigan said it’s doors will remain open for abortions.
“Planned Parenthood of Michigan will continue to evaluate our legal options and remains committed to protecting abortion access in Michigan,” read the unattributed statement.
“Planned Parenthood of Michigan will continue to provide abortion services in accordance with the law. PPMI patients can keep their appointments and our doors remain open.”
The organization also argued court rules mean the order does not take effect for 21 days, the amount of time allowed for an appeal. But that does not necessarily mean prosecutors will wait to start bringing charges.
Kaylie Hanson, Whitmer’s chief communications officer, said in a statement the governor is reviewing the order.
“As we look at next steps, Michiganders should know that Governor Whitmer will continue to fight like hell to protect a woman’s ability to make her own medical decisions with her trusted health care provider,” Hanson said.
“Earlier this year, Governor Whitmer took executive action asking the Michigan Supreme Court to resolve whether the state constitution protects the right to abortion. The Michigan Supreme Court could take up the governor’s lawsuit at any time, and they should do so immediately to provide clarity for Michiganders that their right to abortion remains unchanged.”
Previously, Nessel said abortion rights in Michigan were hanging by a thread. In several tweets Mondayshe said “the thread has torn.”
“The Michigan Court of Appeals has just ruled that MI’s 83 county prosecutors can now begin enforcing the abortion ban. But note that the Dem prosecuting attorneys have committed to refuse to enforce the ban, and the injunction still applies to my department,” Nessel said .
“Stay tuned for further developments on this. Appeals and additional motions on the pending cases are likely.”
Nessel is referring prosecutors in Wayne, Oakland, Washtenaw and other large Michigan counties home to abortion providers who have vowed not to enforce the 1931 law. But prosecutors in Kent, Jackson and Macomb counties — where there are also abortion providers — have indicated they would review possible criminal charges brought by local law enforcement.
The Michigan Court of Appeals’ decision came as part of a broader request from county prosecutors for the higher court to take control over the case that barred enforcement of the 1931 ban.
Earlier this year, Planned Parenthood of Michigan sued Nessel, asking the Michigan Court of Claims to determine the state’s abortion law is unconstitutional.
In April, Court of Claims Judge Elizabeth Gleicher issued a temporary injunction that sought to block enforcement of that law in the event the US Supreme Court overturned Roe. When the high court did reverse the landmark abortion ruling, Gleicher’s order was considered the only action preventing the 1931 law from going back into effect.
Prosecutors from Jackson and Kent counties then asked the Court of Appeals to weigh in, arguing in part that Gleicher had no jurisdiction over county prosecutors.
The Court of Appeals denied the request to take over the case, but in doing so gave these prosecutors the win they wanted, Kallman said.
“The Court of Appeals basically said (Gleicher) has no authority over county prosecutors, which is exactly what we were arguing,” he said.
“This couldn’t be more clear.”
His clients do not plan to appeal. Kallman said as of a couple of weeks ago, he had not heard of any abortion-related possible criminal charges being brought in either Jackson or Kent counties.
More:Gov. Whitmer again asks court to take up abortion suit, citing shifting BHSH stance
More:Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, leaving abortion questions for millions in Michigan
This ruling is separate and unrelated to a lawsuit filed by Whitmer against prosecutors in counties with abortion clinics. The governor and conservative lawyers are currently awaiting a decision from the Michigan Supreme Court on whether to take up that case.
Nessel, a staunch abortion-rights advocate, pledged not to spend any state resources defending the abortion ban. Once Gleicher decided Planned Parenthood had a substantial chance of winning its case and issued the injunction, Nessel quickly said she would not fight the ruling.
The Michigan Legislature and conservative attorneys quickly intervened in the case after Gleicher’s decision, arguing her ruling did not apply to local prosecutors.
They also argued the lawsuit was premature, noting no doctors face charges for allegedly providing an abortion in violation of the law. They also pointed to Gleicher’s admitted connections to Planned Parenthood.
Ultimately, the Michigan Supreme Court will likely decide the constitutionality of the 1931 abortion ban and whether there is a state constitutional right to an abortion. Irrespective of their decision though, there is an ongoing drive to change the state Constitution through a ballot proposal so that it expressly includes the right to an abortion.
The ballot proposal organizers filed more than 750,000 signatures, far exceeding the required amount. But the signatures still need to be reviewed and the Board of State Canvassers still needs to formally determine whether organizers met all requirements before the question can make it to voters this fall.
Contact Dave Boucher at [email protected] or 313-938-4591. Follow him on Twitter @Dave_Boucher1.
Godzilla vs. king 2 you have begun filming. Jameela Jamil talks she hulk‘s Titania. Plus, good news for moonhavenand what’s coming on Westworld, ghostsand Primal. Spoilers away!
Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning
dead line reports Holt McCallany (mind hunter) have joined the cast of Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning as Bernstein, the United States Secretary of Defense.
creepers
Bloody-Disgusting reports Jake Manley, Adeline Rudolph, Francesca Reale, Laurence O’Faurain, Nicholas Hamilton, Javier Botet, Skylan Brooks, and Kai Caster will star in the film adaptation of David Morrell’s creepers. Manley will play Rick, “the official leader of the Creepers” while Rudolph plays Diane, “the unofficial leader of the group, and Rick’s rebellious, defying, impulsive girlfriend.” Reale has been cast as Cora, “a parkour expert and the key in the group who opens doors wherever they’re closed while keeping everyone honest” while O’Faurain joins as Balenger, “a mysterious, brooding, powerful stranger with a secret and who isn’t who he says he is.” Hamilton is said to play Tod, “leader of the Scavengers, a rival urbex group and who is particularly cruel and vicious” opposite Botet as the supernatural Pale Creature” whose domain is the abandoned Paragon Hotel.” Brooks has been cast as Vernon, “the 4th Creeper, a wise-cracking tech-nerd who is not doing a good job of hiding his true feelings for Cora” while Caster rounds out the cast as JD, a former Creeper “exiled after breaking their code and further betraying them by joining the rival Scavs.”
Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 3
During a recent interview with Extra, James Gunn confirmed Harry Styles’ Eros/Starfox does not appear in Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 3.
Nope. I’m setting the record straight. Starfox doesn’t pop up.
James Gunn Says Harry Styles’ Starfox Is NOT in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 (Exclusive)
Shazam! Fury of the Gods
Meanwhile, David F. Sandberg confirmed Rizwan Manji appears as an unnamed character in Shazam! Fury of the Gods.
Godzilla Vyes king 2
Godzilla vs. Kong 2 is currently filming under the working title Origins.
Kung Fu
dead line reports Kim Rhodes and Ben Levin have joined the third season of Kung Fu in recurring roles. Rhodes will play Carrie, “the representative of a restaurant investment group that takes an interest in Harmony dumplings” while Levin has been cast as Bo, “a barista/vigilante whose extracurricular crime fighting leads to a collision with Nicky and her siblings.”
moonhaven
moonhaven has been officially renewed for a second season at AMC+. [Deadline]
She-Hulk: Attorney at Law
Jameela Jamil described her character Titania as both “annoying” and “unselfconscious” in a recent interview with ScreenRant.
Titania stands out because I think she’s the most annoying of them, actually. I think she almost does n’t need to use her strength from her; she could just annoy you to death. And I think that is a superpower that we haven’t really utilized enough.
She’s also very glamorous. I like the fact that she’s a bit curvy, and I like the fact that she’s completely unselfconscious. Ella she’s completely unselfconscious and so, so weird. We’ll see.
ghosts
ghosts has released a “this year on…” trailer for its second season premiering on September 29.
Ghosts Season 2 Teaser Promo
Westworld
The hosts endure spiritual conversion in the trailer for “Metanoia,” next week’s episode of Westworld.
Westworld 4×07 “Metanoia” Promo
Primal
Finally, Spear and Fang battle vikings in a new clip from this week’s episode of Primal.
Primal | S2E4 Sneak Peek: Spear and Fang Battle the Warrior Clan | adult swim
Banner art by Jim Cook
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel and starwars releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TVand everything you need to know about House of the Dragon and Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.
It’s crunch time for the AFL clubs in finals and flag contention – and most of them have several issues to address and fix before September.
Triple premiership Lion Jonathan Brown told Fox Footy’s On The Couch Geelong and Melbourne had “separated” themselves from the chasing pack, while Melbourne champion Garry Lyon said the way the Sydney Swans had been winning of late suggested they can be “added to the group”.
So the On The Couch panel, with the help of Champion Dataon Monday night discussed the concerns at seven clubs in the finals mix and their issues that would be “keeping coaches up at night”.
Watch every blockbuster AFL match this weekend Live & Ad-Break Free In-Play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Start your free trial now >
NEW FIRST CRACK PODCAST — R20 wrap: ‘Arrogant’ Blues torched, Danger’s best flag chance
Listen below or subscribe in Apple Podcasts or Spotify
BRISBANE LIONS
The Lions have slipped out of the top four – and now face a tough task to get back in there.
They’ve gone 5-5 from their past 10 games, while they’re 4-4 against top-10 teams across the entire season so far.
St Kilda legend Nick Riewoldt pointed to several alarming Champion Data rankings around the Lions’ defensive profile.
Since Round 10, the Lions have been ranked 16th for points against, 15th for opposition scores per inside 50, 13th for points against from turnovers, 14th for points against from clearances and, of most concern, 18th for points against from defensive half.
“We know offense hasn’t been their issue of late. It’s the fact that they’re getting scored against so heavily, particularly from the defensive half,” Riewoldt told On The Couch.
“This hasn’t been a major issue for them over the last few years. Defensively they’ve been so strong, so in a year where we all thought they’ll take the next step, this was not part of the game that they could afford to drop away, which it has dramatically.”
“It’s clearly not just the defensive half of the ground where the struggles are or the back six – it’s all over the ground. So defending ball movement and not exposing your back six.”
Brown questioned whether the Lions’ forwards were wired to prioritize hitting the scoreboard, rather than applying pressure.
“Teams are able to move the ball from the Lions’ forward half, so clearly they’re not putting enough pressure on there,” he said.
“The other thing is the five or six forwards at the Lions are thinking: ‘For me to bring value to the team, in my own mind, I need to kick two or three goals today’ – thinking about themselves. I’m not sure where the focus lies there and where the balance lies between kicking goals and putting the defensive pressure on and playing a role for the team and making my teammate better.
“I’m just seeing some little things along the way, so that’s a watch.”
FREMANTLE
Like Brisbane, the Dockers have fallen out of the top four and now face an uphill battle to earn a double chance for September.
Lyon said the Dockers looked “unimaginative” and “passive” in their most recent performance against Melbourne. They now haven’t won since Round 17.
Brown pointed out points from turnover had become “a really big problem” for the Dockers, ranking 16th in that category since Round 10.
“The thing is they can’t move the football at the moment,” he said.
“Teams have obviously started to work them out. They’re pressing up, they’re taking away their uncontested marks.
“Their ability to move the football is a huge concern for mine.”
CARLTON
Dual premiership Kangaroo David King labeled the Blues’ loss to Adelaide as one of the most “arrogant” performances he’d seen by an AFL team in years.
Instead of cementing their spot in the top eight, the defeat has left the Blues somewhat vulnerable ahead of the final three weeks. They need one more win to guarantee a finals spot, but they have a tough run against Brisbane, Melbourne and Collingwood.
In the past six weeks, according to Champion Datathe Blues have been ranked 14th for points scored and 13th for scores per inside 50 – rankings that stunned Riewoldt because of Carlton’s personnel up forward.
“Their scoring has dried up, which is the last thing you’d expect to happen with this group when you consider who they’ve got in the front half,” he said.
“They’re just not scoring and their efficiency when they actually get it in there to (Charlie) Curnow and (Harry) McKay and these guys is just not at the level it was at the start of the season.”
Brown added: “They were off with their contest work and competitiveness. Disappointing on the weekend.”
ST KILDA
The Saints squeezed into the top eight on the weekend, surviving an almighty comeback from a fast-finishing Hawthorn to make it two wins on the trot.
But they just haven’t been the same team since their Round 13 bye, losing five of their past eight games.
And since their bye, the Saints are ranked 15th for both points differential from turnover and points differential from clearances.
“They’ve got two areas here … They’re well aware of this and the way they move the footy would be another one,” Lyon said.
“They’re in the eight right now and they’ve got three games to go, so it’s their spot to lose.”
RICHMOND
After three close losses and a draw, the Tigers conjured a mighty close win on Sunday against the Lions to keep their final hopes alive. It was just their second win in six games.
Those past six weeks have seen a dip in Richmond’s off-ball ability. They’re ranked 17th for contested possession – an area not seen as a strength of the Tigers’ during their premiership dynasty – but 18th for pressure – a massive strength during their premiership era.
“The concern is without the footy,” Brown said. “We say ‘without the footy’ because the contested footy hasn’t been great, but it’s been their pressure, which has been 18th in the last six weeks.
“The reason that’s important for Richmond is they were highly ranked in the 2017 to 2020 season, so they need to be doing that well to be a contender.”
WESTERN BULLDOGS
The Dogs felt the full brunt of a brutal Geelong team last weekend, blown away during a ruthless third term.
They now sit 10th on the ladder, meaning they must win at least two of their final three games against the Dockers, Giants and Hawks if they are to feature in September.
What would help their cause would be an improvement in defending all movement – an area in which they’re ranked 14th across the 2022 season.
“There are defensive concerns,” Riewoldt said.
“When you’ve got a back six that we’ve talked about being susceptible at times, you want to be able to defend ball movement and stop it actually getting in there – and that’s not the case at the moment.
“The ball’s going from one end of the ground to the other far too easily.”
COLLINGWOOD
Lyon said it was a “bit of a stretch” to find an improvement area for a Magpies team that’s won 10 consecutive games.
But Riewoldt said the Pies could sharpen up at the coalface, although he added: “The part of their game they have to improve is probably clearance – but you can win the ball without being great in that area.”
Indigenous Country Liberal senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has told Q+A she will “probably not” be working to support a referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.
Key points:
Yolngu elder Yiniya Mark Guyula says his people are ready for a Voice to Parliament
NT Senator Jacinta Price says she would likely not support the referendum
Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney says information will be readily available before any vote
On Monday night’s episode, which was pre-taped from Garma Festival and hosted by Stan Grant, Senator Price was asked by an audience member if she would work to support the referendum.
She said there were more pressing issues facing Indigenous communities.
“I’ll be completely honest: there are more pressing issues,” Senator Price said before listing promises about education funding for the Yippinga School in Alice Springs and issues about alcohol making its way back into Indigenous communities.
“I have listened to and spoke to the Yippinga school in Alice Springs,” she said.
“The commitment I made to them if I were to get into government was to build a facility for student and staff accommodation.
“That school looks after Aboriginal kids in the surrounding town camps, and they come from very difficult backgrounds … some of them have to spend a three-hour round trip to go to school.”
Senator Price also said she felt little was being done about alcohol issues in Indigenous communities, describing “rivers of grog” being allowed to flow at present.
loading
“We know that right now alcohol is being let back out into communities, and this is huge,” she said.
“We know that the voices of the organizations that have been speaking out against allowing the rivers of grog back in have said, ‘Please don’t do this.’ but that’s fallen on deaf ears.
“[I’d rather] get the work done. So no, I probably won’t be supporting a referendum.”
The comments would have come as a blow, albeit an expected one, after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said during the weekend he was willing to take an Indigenous Voice to Parliament to a referendum.
‘Another bureaucracy’
Senator Price had earlier on the show railed against enshrining an Indigenous Voice within the Australian constitution, stating she had misgivings about bureaucratic processes and what would happen if things went wrong once it was in the constitution.
“I don’t feel as though something like this needs to be constitutionally enshrined,” Senator Price said.
“I look at the success of the Gumatj.
“What they have done with their country, the way they educate their young people, have industry up and running—they have their own bauxite mine.
“All those things have already happened and it’s all successfully occurred without the need for enshrining a voice to parliament to do so.
“And my biggest concern with this idea of a constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament is it’s another bureaucracy.”
loading
Senator Price then added she believed a Voice would marginalize Indigenous Australians.
“I wouldn’t want to see us divided up along the lines of race in that regard, and I don’t want to continue to pour money into an industry that has been driven on the back of the misery of Indigenous Australians and propping up another bureaucracy,” she said.
“It’s not something new. It’s just enshrining a bureaucracy into the constitution.
“And if there are bureaucracies that have failed and [people] have not been accountable, how are we going to adjust this, which will exist in the constitution and can’t be dismantled should it fail?”
burney hits back
It was an argument that did not sit well with Minister for Indigenous Affairs Linda Burney, who was steadfast in her support for an Indigenous Voice.
“What we are talking about here is a permanent voice that no government can get rid of, that’s why enshrinement is so important,” Ms Burney said.
“And when it comes to another bureaucracy, it is going to be a body that we will consult with — you and everyone else on what it will look like and how it will operate.”
Ms Burney also shot down any suggestion it would not be clear what people were voting for at a referendum.
“The design of the Voice will happen after respectful, extensive consultation with First Nations people and the Australian community,” she said.
“It will happen before the legislation will take place.
“It won’t be me deciding, that would be so wrong, it will be people that we consult with and build a consensus with that we will listen to.
“There will be a lot of information out to the community about what people are voting on. It would be nuts for that not to happen.”
Asked whether it was a concern the proposal could be shot down, Ms Burney said she felt the time was right, backing the PM’s statement: “If not now, when?” She also said she felt both sides of politics were on board.
“We want to build consensus across the parliament, and I am so happy to see Peter Dutton is open to this, David Littleproud is open to this and the Australian people are ready,” she said.
loading
“We wouldn’t be embarking on this exercise if there was not a belief the tide wasn’t with us.”
Treaty became like ‘writing in the sand’
However an Indigenous Voice has been floated before and independent Member for Mulka, NT and Yolngu elder Yiniya Mark Guyula remembers when treaty was discussed in the 80s.
Now a politician, something he admitted he did not love being, he said Aboriginal people were more than ready.
“My people here in the East Arnhem land have been ready for a long time,” he told Grant when asked by the Q+A host.
“We have been ready for a long time, because I can talk about the example of the 1988 Barunga petition.
“There were two land councils…. that brought all our elders from both Center and from the East, we were ready for the recognition of our Indigenous identity, but the government wasn’t ready.
“All their promises about ‘there will be treaty’, and that echoed all along and nothing ever happened.
“At that time, it was a new promise that we had got and everybody was happy, but as time went on we waited and waited and waited, and it became like writing in the sand.
“We are ready for this one.
“If that referendum was called now, we would be gathering our people and we would go for it, go for it as soon as we could.”
The first US Capitol riot defendant convicted at trial faces sentencing Monday with prosecutors asking a judge for a 15-year-prison term, by far the longest sentence sought to date in a case related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on Congress.
The request for Guy Refitt, a recruiter for the extremist Three Percenters movement who led a mob at the Capitol, is roughly one-third longer than the nine to 11 years recommended under federal advisory guidelines. Prosecutors say the stiff punishment is warranted, following up for the first time on threats to request an enhanced terrorism sentencing penalty for defendants who reject plea deals.
Reffitt was convicted March 8 of five felony offenses, including obstruction of Congress as it met to certify the 2020 election result, interfering with police and carrying a firearm to a riot, and threatening his teenage son, who turned him in to the FBI.
The defense for Reffitt, a 49-year-old former oil industry rig manager, asked for a below-guidelines sentence of two years in prison. Attorney F. Clinton Broden said in a filing that his client committed no violence and has no criminal history, yet prosecutors are seeking far more time for him than for defendants who have pleaded guilty to assault police.
Citing terrorism, US seeks 15-year prison sentence in Jan. 6 case
“It makes a mockery of the criminal justice system, the Sixth Amendment right to trial, and the victims assaulted by [others] to argue that Mr. Reffitt should be given a sentence greater than (let alone three times greater than) a defendant who assaulted police officers on at least two separate occasions, spent three hours on the Capitol grounds and who has a past history of violence, Broden wrote.
But Assistant US Attorneys Jeffrey Nestler and Risa Berkower said Reffitt’s case is exceptional.
Reffitt “played a central role” at the head of a vigilante mob that challenged and overran police at a key choke point, a stairway leading up from the Lower West Terrace, before the initial breach of windows near the Capitol’s Senate Wing Doors at 2: 1 p.m., prosecutors said. After the riot, Reffitt warned his son and 16-year-old daughter that “if you turn me in, you’re a traitor, and traitors get shot,” his son testified at the trial.
Conventional sentencing rules are of “inadequate scope” to account for the range of Reffitt’s obstruction, witness tampering and weapon offenses, prosecutors wrote in a 58-page sentencing memo.
“Reffitt sought not just to stop Congress, but also to physically attack, remove, and replace the legislators who were serving in Congress,” prosecutors wrote.
They called his conduct “a quintessential example of an attempt to both influence and retaliate against government conduct through intimidation or coercion” and said it reflected the statutory definition of terrorist violence that is subject to harsher punishment.
A jury found that Reffitt traveled to DC from his home in Wylie, Tex., with an AR-style rifle and semiautomatic .40-caliber handgun and repeatedly stated his intention to come armed with a handgun and plastic handcuffs to drag lawmakers out of the building. After returning home from Washington, he threatened his children to ensure they did not turn him in to authorities.
The request by the US attorney’s office in DC, which is overseeing prosecutions of roughly 840 Capitol siege defendants federally charged so far, is not binding on US District Judge Dabney L.Friedrich, who has gone below prosecutors’ recommendation in 22 of 24 Jan. 6 sentencings to date.
The longest sentence in a Jan. 6 case so far is 63 months, given to a Florida man who pleaded guilty to attacking police with a fire extinguisher and wooden plank and a DC man who assaulted three officers and shattered a riot shield with a pole.
By comparison, Friedrich has sentenced only three defendants who have pleaded guilty to felonies so far, the longest to 27 months in prison, also for attacking police.
Nevertheless, prosecutors may be hoping to send a clear signal to the roughly 330 defendants still awaiting trial on felony charges and who may still be considering whether to accept a plea deal or gamble before a jury. About 70 people have pleaded guilty, and nine, including Reffitt, have been convicted at trial.
Rage met by revulsion — first Jan. 6 trial shows family, nation torn by Trump
Reffitt left home at 15, moved in with his older sister and began working as a KFC dishwasher after enduring years of physical abuse from his father, Broden wrote. After becoming a father himself, Broden said, Reffitt was devoted to his children by him and to creating safe spaces for others. Reffitt, his attorney deél said, was a self-made man who took his family abroad while he worked in places including Malaysia in charge of operations worth tens of millions of dollars, but was financially and emotionally devastated after a downturn in the oil and gas industry. He lost his job in November 2019, only a few months before the pandemic swept the United States.
Reffitt’s daughters noticed that “his mental health was declining” over that period, Broden wrote. Reffitt fell “down the rabbit hole of political news and online banter,” he wrote one of his daughters, and he fell under the sway of Donald Trump “constantly feeding polarizing racial thought.”
“I could really see how my father[’]s ego and personality fell to his knees when President Trump spoke, you could tell he listened to Trump’s words as if he was really truly speaking to him,” one of Reffitt’s daughters said.
Letters from nine friends and relatives provided to the court by Reffitt’s defense “describe a depressed man who believed he was unable to adequately provide for his family (his life’s mission), and a man who felt cast aside and marginalized,” Broden wrote.
Reffitt started a security business and joined the Three Percenters in Texas. The right-wing anti-government group is named after the myth that only 3 percent of colonists fought in the American Revolution against the British.
In a letter to the judge, Reffitt outlined a string of family traumas since 2020 including medical and mental health emergencies and pleaded for leniency for the sake of his family.
“My regrets for what has happened is insurmountable. There’s not a day go by that I don’t regret how much this has affected [my wife and children],” Reffitt wrote. “Yes, what is happening to my family is all my fault, I would like to fix it, please. … I simply ask for a chance to prove myself again.”
WhatsApp is currently one of the most popular instant messaging platforms in the entire world, and needless to say, whenever a new government bill related to user privacy is under debate, the Meta-owned company obviously has an important word to say.
This time, the Online Safety Bill in the United Kingdom is the one that’s giving WhatsApp headaches, as the local government would essentially be able to scan user conversations and look for any content that would be related to child abuse.
In other words, the government is looking into a way to break the end-to-end encryption, something that WhatsApp isn’t willing to accept.
WhatsApp: Breaking E2E is a big no-no
CEO Will Cathcart told BBC in an interview that WhatsApp wouldn’t agree to compromise the privacy of all users just because the government wants to scan the conversations of a small number of accounts.
“Client-side scanning cannot work in practice. If we had to lower security for the world, to accommodate the requirement in one country, that…would be very foolish for us to accept, making our product less desirable to 98% of our users because of the requirements from 2%. What’s being proposed is that we – either directly or indirectly through software – read everyone’s messages. I don’t think people want that,” Cathcart said.
On the other hand, the government says that end-to-end encryption could eventually become a roadblock in every attempt to catch criminals hiding under this technology when going online.
“They shouldn’t ignore the clear risk that end-to-end encryption could blind them to this content and hamper efforts to catch the perpetrators,” a government spokesperson was quoted as saying by the same source. “We continue to work with the tech sector to support the development of innovative technologies that protect public safety without compromising on privacy.”
Annemiek van Vleuten won the first Tour de France Femmes avec Zwift in emphatic style Sunday.
The Dutchwoman scored her second successive victory of the race on stage 8, making a massive move with six kilometers remaining on Super Planche des Belles Filles summit finish and then soloing to the line.
The Movistar Team rider overtook several riders who had been in an earlier break and fended off the efforts of closest rival Demi Vollering (SD Worx) and a separate group of chasers to get back on terms.
She dug in on the dirt road inside the final kilometer and reached the finish well clear. Vollering came in 30 seconds back, while Silvia Persico (Valcar-Travel & Service) won the battle for third, 1:43 behind.
Kasia Niewiadoma (Canyon-SRAM) was nine seconds further adrift in fourth, trailed four seconds later by Juliette Labous (Team DSM). Elisa Longo Borghini (Trek-Segfredo) was sixth at 2:01, while Saturday’s third-place finisher Cecilie Uttrup Ludwig (FDJ-Suez-Futuroscope) faded on the final climb and was eighth at 2:50.
“That’s actually a dream that comes true,” said Van Vleuten at the summit. “Winning in yellow at the top. And it was not an easy stage. It was not an easy week. It has been a super big rollercoaster for me. And even today it was not easy. But to finish here in yellow, just… the best way.”
She ended the race 3:48 ahead of Vollering and 6:35 in front of Niewiadoma. Labous and Persico were 7:28 and 8:00 back respectively.
“I am super proud to be the first winner of the Tour de France for the women, when it is back on the calendar,” said Van Vleuten. And then again [to be] the first woman to win it in this new version. I hope it is a big start and we can build this event to be a bigger event for the women.
“I think it is a milestone to win the first one of these.”
The victory adds to her recent win in the Giro d’Italia Donne and, together with earlier success this year, makes her season a very successful one.
She said that she and the team will make sure to mark the occasion later. “I think now it all can sink in and finally I can really enjoy it. Yesterday, it was an unbelievable day, but I still wanted to keep the focus. I didn’t want to celebrate already.
“But now I can finally go, eat ice cream and pizza tonight, and to celebrate with this team. My team said that sometimes you take too little time to celebrate, [that] we always continue. But tonight I can celebrate without thinking about tomorrow.”
How it played out
The final day of the Tour de France Femmes was the second high mountain stage in the race, beginning at Lure and covering 123.3km to La Super Planche des Belles Filles.
The final ascent was familiar to cycling fans, having already featured in the men’s Tour de France several weeks ago at the end of on stage 7. The last portion of the climb was on dirt roads, adding to the spectacle of the finale.
The first third of the stage was on mainly flat terrain, with an intermediate sprint at 47.5km and then the first of three categorized climbs, the second category Côte d’Esmouliéres (52.5km). This was followed by more steadily rising roads before a descent to the base of the first category Ballon d’Alsace (84.5km), and then another downhill towards the start of the final climb.
Stage 7 winner Van Vleuten started the stage at a comfortable 3:09 ahead of her nearest rival Vollering, 4:20 ahead of Niewiadoma and a further minute up on Labous.
Uttrup Ludwig and Persico were fifth and sixth, just under six minutes in arrears. Given the margins, Van Vleuten was looking almost certain of overall victory, but still had to be careful to avoid unexpected problems.
Vollering begain the stage in the Queen of the Mountains polka dot jersey, while double stage winner Marianne Vos (Jumbo-Visma) had an unassailable lead in the points competition. Shirin van Anrooij (Trek-Segafredo) was the best young rider.
There were two non-starters, Anna Henderson (Jumbo-Visma) and Ashleigh Moolman-Pasio (SD Worx), who had come down with an infection.
Following an aggressive opener the peloton raced through the intermediate sprint point, where Maria Giulia Confalonieri (Ceratizit-WNT Pro Cycling) took the top points. Rachel Neylan (Cofidis) attacked on the Côte d’Esmouliéres but chasing by Canyon-SRAM saw her hauled back just before the summit, where Vollering took the top points to boost her lead in the QOM contest.
Leah Thomas (Trek-Segafredo) then attacked after the prime line and was joined by Pauliena Roojakkers (Canyon-SRAM), then by Mavi Garcia (UAE Team ADQ) plus seven others.
The group of Thomas, Roojakkers, Garcia, Paula Patiño (Movistar), Grace Brown (FDJ Suez Futuroscope), Riejanne Markus (Jumbo-Visma), Liane Lippert (Team DSM), Elise Chabbey (Canyon-SRAM), Yara Kastelijn (Plantur Pura) and Coralie Demay (St Michel Auber 93) worked solidly together and built a-25 second advantage with 66km remaining.
Of those, Garcia was best-placed overall in ninth place, 12:06 off the yellow jersey of Van Vleuten. Chabbey was one place and 18 seconds further behind.
This group was chased by Victoire Berteau (Cofidis), who was then joined by Ane Santesteban (BikeExchange-Jayco), Jeanne Korevaar (Liv Racing Xstra) and Antri Christoforou (Human Powered Health). The quartet managed to bridge across with 51 kilometers remaining. The peloton was one minute back at that point, with race leader Van Vleuten a further 20 seconds in arrears after stopping with a bike problem and taking her teammate Arlenis Sierra’s machine.
Lotte Kopecky (SD Worx) was setting a hard pace at the head of the peloton, making things more difficult for Van Vleuten’s return. She was chasing with teammates but these cracked after riding hard to try to help her reduce the gap.
The leaders were just 25 seconds ahead of the peloton at the bottom of the category 1 Ballon d’Alsace. Van Vleuten was a further 20 seconds back at that point but was able to rejoin soon afterwards, her chase aided by her climbing ability on the slopes.
However she stopped once more to change bikes, taking one of the yellow machines supplied to mark her maillot jaune. She chased back on, yet changed it again soon afterwards.
The bunch was 45 seconds behind the leaders with 7km left on the climb. Krista Doebel-Hickok (EF Education-Tibco-SVB) attacked the bunch and was able to gradually bridge to the front group, while Vollering fired off a couple of probing attacks but was marked by Van Vleuten.
Garcia led Rooijakkers, Brown, Markus and others across the summit, with the Van Vleuten/Vollering group 1:10 behind there. With 24km remaining Rachel Neylan (Cofidis) tried to jump clear of that second group, and formed part of a five-woman chase group with Demay, Nina Biujsman (Human Powered Health), Mischa Bredewold (Parkhotel Valkenburg) and Vittoria Guazzini (FDJ Suez Futuroscope). These were at 50 seconds with 18 kilometers left.
Heading onto the final climb, Garcia was pushing the pace inside the final eight km. Markus, Doebel-Hickok, Rooijakkers, Chabbey, Kastelijn, Lippert, Patiño and Brown were also there, poised for the last mountain of this year’s event.
Race leader forges ahead on La Planche des Belles Filles
Rooijakkers lit the fuse with 7km remaining, dancing clear and leaving Garcia and Lippert straining to get across to her. The latter cracked and went back to the rest of the group, while Garcia remained several seconds back as the climb progressed. Back in the yellow jersey group, Uttrup Ludwig and Niewiadoma were turning the screw with Van Vleuten and Vollering close behind.
Van Vleuten then attacked approximately one kilometer later, with Vollering trying unsuccessfully to come across. Out front, Garcia had caught and dropped Rooijakkers and was leading the race, but Van Vleuten was able to join her before pushing on alone.
With 3km left Vollering was 25 seconds back while a chase group comprising Niewiadoma, Labous, Longo Borghini, Persico, and Ewers were further behind. Uttrup Ludwig had been dropped, leaving those five in pursuit.
Van Vleuten raced onto the final dirt road section with just under a kilometer remaining. Niewiadoma and Labous dropped the others on a steep section, yet they were able to rejoin on the flatter second before that dirt road.
Van Vleuten continued towards the summit, grinding as she neared the line to win the race. Vollering looked similarly happy in taking a second, while Persico beat Niewiadoma for third.
Tour de France Women (2.WWT) Lure → La Super Planche des Belles Filles
A three-month-old baby has had her critical heart surgery scheduled and canceled four times in the last two weeks.
Amelia Rehn was born with congenital heart failure in Melbourne and first had surgery to implant a stent at just two-days-old.
Her wearied parents Brad and Jessica are from Tasmania and have been unable to take their baby girl home as she needs another surgery at the Royal Children’s Hospital to give Amelia a bigger stent.
“We are tired and exhausted and we have nothing left in the tank,” Jessica told 9News.
“We are waiting day by day and waiting to see when we can go home.”
At the end of March, 89,000 people were waiting for elective and critical surgery in Victoria.
Baby Amelia has joined them.
“There are not enough beds and the system is broken and there is no room,” Jessica said.
“It’s awful, she is sick enough to be in the hospital but not sick enough to need emergency surgery.”
Victoria’s chief health officer Brett Sutton said the state had passed the peak of the BA.4 and BA.5 wave.
But the current surgery back-log is due to the thousands of healthcare workers home sick with COVID-19.
“I understand the relief but pressures on the health system will remain for some time to come,” Sutton said.
The subvariants and mutations of COVID-19
Half of the 773 Victorians in hospital with COVID are over 75 and almost one in 10 new cases has been infected before.
Sutton said vulnerable people should focus on wearing masks and getting their third and fourth COVID-19 vaccinations.
MANILA — Fidel V. Ramos — former president of the Philippines, career military official and figure of the 1986 revolution that deposed a dictatorship — died on Sunday. He was 94.
Ramos led the military under the dictatorship of Ferdinand E. Marcos, his second cousin.
“Our family shares the Filipino people’s grief on this sad day,” Marcos’s son and the current president, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., said in a statement. “We did not only lose a good leader but also a member of the family.”
Ramos’s defection was among the highlights of the People Power movement that overthrew the Marcos regime, which was known for widespread human rights violations andplundering up to $10 billion from government coffers.
He went on to serve as army chief and defense secretary of the post-revolution administration under democracy icon Corazon Aquino. He later succeeded her as the 12th president of the republic, from 1992 to 1998.
Ramos leaves behind a mixed legacy. To his supporters of him, he is a hero of the revolution who went on to urge the Marcos family to publicly apologize for their misdeeds. As president, he was credited with helping modernize the economy and forging a peace agreement with rebel forces in the southern Philippines.
To his detractors, he has yet to be held liable for police and military abuses under his watch — and his actions were not enough to prevent an eventual Marcos comeback.
Born on March 18, 1928, Ramos was a career military official before he got into politics. I have graduated from the US Military Academy at West Point and served in both the Korean and Vietnam wars.
When Marcos declared martial law in 1972, Ramos led the Philippine Constabulary. In a 2017 interview with Maria Ressa, co-founder of the news site Rappler and a 2021 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Ramos explained why he turned against Marcos — despite a long history that involved the future dictator hiding in his family’s sanctuary during World War II .
“You must understand that even with that close relationship and association during the war… why did I go against this guy?” he said. “It’s because of what is in the constitution. … You obey the orders of your superior, your commanding officer, if they are legal orders. But when he started to stray during the martial law years… that went against my values.”
During his term, Ramos brokered a peace agreement with the Moro National Liberation Front, then a separatist group operating in the Muslim majority south.
In 2016, Ramos threw his support behind populist candidate Rodrigo Duterte, the tough-talking strongman who would later be known for a brutal anti-drug campaign that left thousands dead.
But within the same year, the former president said Duterte’s government was “a huge disappointment and let-down,” criticizing Duterte’s constant cursing and hostility toward the United States in foreign policy in a column for the broadsheet Manila Bulletin. I have resigned as Duterte’s appointed special envoy to China that same year.
Duterte also allowed the controversial state burial of Marcos in the Cemetery of Heroes. Ramos opposed the decision, which sparked thousands to take to the streets in protest. When Ramos was president, he allowed the family to bury the late dictator in their home region of Ilocos when they returned from exile in the United States. Some Marcos critics believe Ramos should not have allowed them to return.
In this year’s national elections, the party that Ramos founded endorsed the dictator’s son, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., who won in a landslide. However, officials from Ramos’s cabinet publicly endorsed opposition candidate Maria Leonor Robredo. Ramos himself, who had been out of the public eye because of the pandemic, did not make a public endorsement.
Despite the criticism, Ramos has generally aged as a respected figure in Philippine politics. His contemporary of him Juan Ponce Enrile, a former Marcos defense minister who defected alongside him, faced corruption scandals and has since walked back criticism of the dictator. He has since returned to the fold of power, and serves as legal counsel to Marcos Jr. at 98. Ramos’s successor to the presidency, Joseph Estrada, was later ousted in a second People Power revolution amid corruption issues.
In a forum covering Ramos’s legacy last year, political columnist and veteran journalist John Nery said the former president “passed the test of time.”
“It should be clear now that, in the end, and to the end, I have retained an abiding loyalty to the primacy of the constitution. … whatever the constitution was,” Nery said. I have added that Ramos’s loyalty to him to the law explained his defection to him.
“There is no gainsaying his constitutional sense, and his fidelity to it. When I think of the possibilities open to him, during the era of the coup attempts, to choose the other side — which would have completely changed the country’s history — I appreciate all the more that he knew his limits of him. ”