Categories
Business

‘Can’t find them anywhere’: Why Starburst lollies have disappeared from Aussie shelves

There’s a reason Australians haven’t been able to spot Starburst on supermarket shelves and it might leave a bitter taste in lolly lovers’ mouths.

Confectionery giant Mars Wrigley has confirmed it has discontinued the Starburst brand in Australia.

The move means the brand’s iconic chews, snakes and babies will no longer be stocked across the country.

The news came after TikTok creator Nariman Dein uploaded a video expressing her frustrations at being unable to find the lollies in Sydney, having scoured several supermarkets.

“These were the best and I can’t find them anywhere,” Dein said.

“And I’m having some conspiracy theory — did they just stop selling them and no-one noticed?

“Is this another Mandela effect?”

Mars Wrigley responded to the video, which attracted about 276,000 views, by releasing a statement confirming the absence of Starburst lines wasn’t a conspiracy.

A woman appears sad in front of a Starburst lollies packet.
Dein said she had scouted supermarkets across Sydney, including Big W and Woolworths. (Tik Tok: Nariman Dein)

“Our Starburst products are imported from Europe and, like many businesses that are importing products from overseas, the brand has been exposed to supply chain difficulties and rising cost pressures over the last two years,” a spokesperson for the company said.

“After reviewing all options, we’ve made the difficult decision to discontinue the brand in Australia from June 2022.”

Mars Wrigley is a major American multinational manufacturer of chocolate, chewing gum, mints and fruity sweets.

.

Categories
Sports

Penrith coach Ivan Cleary supports NRL decision to suspend Ricky Stuart

Penrith coach Ivan Cleary threw his support behind the one-week suspension for Canberra Raiders mentor Ricky Stuart after his post-match verbal attack on Panther Jaeman Salmon, declaring the NRL handled the situation “pretty well”.

Stuart has been banned from all coaching duties, including any interaction with his players, for a week and personally fined $25,000 for calling Salmon a “weak-gutted dog” after the Panthers’ win over the Raiders last weekend.

Stream every game of every round of the 2022 NRL Telstra Premiership Season Live & Ad-Break Free During Play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Start your free trial now >

Salmon kicked Raider Tom Starling in the groin during the game, for which he was fined $1000, sparking the reaction from Stuart who subsequently apologised.

Cleary said Salmon and his family had been “rattled” and the NRL’s punishment for Stuart was sufficient as he became the first coach banned for post-match comments.

“As a club, we support the NRL,” Cleary said.

“It’s been handled pretty well by the NRL. I think (the penalty) is fair.

“We’ve been sticking close to Jaeman this week and hopefully he and everyone else can move on.”

Penrith Panthers coach Ivan Cleary has backed Ricky Stuart’s ban. Picture: Jonathan NgSource: News Corp Australia

Salmon, who will again start as Penrith five-eighth in a blockbuster showdown with Melbourne at home on Thursday night, is yet to speak publicly on the issue.

But Cleary said the week’s drama wouldn’t impact Salmon’s performance and he had been in better spirits at training after being taken aback by Stuart’s outburst.

“He was a bit rattled on the night,” Cleary said.

“He was also a bit concerned about his family. They were quite upset, so I guess when that happens, it brings it to another level.

“But this week he’s seemed OK… He’s shown he’s pretty strong-minded.

Jaeman Salmon was rattled by Stuart’s comments. Picture: Mark Evans/Getty ImagesSource: Getty Images

“He’s a really popular member of the team on and off the field. We love him.

“We certainly thought it was best if he just kept his head down and just let it blow over and got on with his footy.

“It’s a really important game for him and the club tomorrow night.”

Penrith can seal a second minor premiership in three seasons with victory over the Storm.

.

Categories
Australia

Brett O’Dea case: New trial over Perth ‘vigilante’ bashing of Alimamy Koroma

A Perth man who severely bashed an African migrant in a misguided vigilante attack has had his conviction overturned by the High Court and will face a retrial.

Brett Christopher O’Dea, 46, was found guilty by a jury of committing grievous bodily harm with intent to Alimamy Koroma, a 35-year-old migrant from Sierra Leone, in the driveway of a Manning home in January 2018.

Mr Koroma had been chasing a young woman who had attempted to steal from the bowling club where he worked as a cleaner when he was attacked by O’Dea and another man, Jacob Jefferson Webb.

O’Dea testified he had heard the woman screaming she had been raped and ran out to protect her, responding in a manner he felt was appropriate at the time.

He attacked Mr Koroma with a weapon similar to a hockey stick, kicked him in the face and punched him in the head at least 10 times while he was on the ground.

The father-of-one suffered a traumatic brain injury and a fractured skull. He was forced to move into a rehabilitation facility after suffering cognitive impairments that left him unable to work or drive.

O’Dea’s trial in the District Court of Western Australia was told Mr Koroma’s brain injury was more likely to have been caused by O’Dea than Webb. It was also possible it was caused by a combination of their acts, prosecutors said.

A father-of-one suffered a traumatic brain injury and a fractured skull.  He was forced to move into a rehabilitation facility after suffering cognitive impairments that left him unable to work or drive.
Camera IconA father-of-one suffered a traumatic brain injury and a fractured skull. He was forced to move into a rehabilitation facility after suffering cognitive impairments that left him unable to work or drive. Credit: trevor collens/The Sunday Times

O’Dea was found guilty in 2019 and sentenced to a minimum of four years and three months in prison.

The jury was unable to reach a verdict for Webb, who later faced a retrial and was convicted of the alternative charge of unlawfully doing grievous bodily harm.

O’Dea’s conviction was upheld last year by WA’s Court of Appeal.

Brett Christopher O'Dea, pictured, was found guilty by a jury of committing grievous bodily harm with intent to Alimamy Koroma.
Camera IconBrett Christopher O’Dea, pictured, was found guilty by a jury of committing grievous bodily harm with intent to Alimamy Koroma. Credit: unknown/Facebook

But Australia’s highest court on Wednesday ruled O’Dea had suffered a miscarriage of justice because the trial judge had erred in his instructions to the jury.

A majority of High Court judges found the instructions, based upon the “broadest” interpretation of the relevant legislation, left it open to the jury to attribute acts to O’Dea that Webb may have been carried out.

“That direction was an error of law amounting to a miscarriage of justice,” Justices Michelle Gordon, James Edelman and Simon Steward said.

The jury needed to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that O’Dea’s acts, in isolation, were sufficient to have caused the brain injury and were not undertaken in self-defence or because of an honest or reasonable mistake, they said.

In dissenting remarks, Chief Justice Susan Kiefel and Justice Stephen Gageler found the jury had been entitled to convict O’Dea.

The court ordered his conviction be set aside and a new trial held.

.

Categories
US

Five takeaways from primaries in Wisconsin, Minnesota and beyond

Tuesday’s primaries in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Vermont and Connecticut saw victories for Trump-endorsed candidates in the GOP, wins for progressives on the Democratic side of the aisle, and a few history-making moments as well.

Former President Trump and progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) touted their endorsed candidates’ victories, while Democrats in Vermont put the state on track to send its first woman representative to Capitol Hill.

Here are five takeaways from Tuesday’s primaries.

A good night for Trump-backed candidates

Trump saw a number of victories on Tuesday, marking a second successful week in a row for the power of his endorsement.

In Wisconsin, Trump-endorsed businessman Tim Michels defeated his GOP gubernatorial primary opponent, former Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch, who had the backing of former Vice President Mike Pence. If he wins, Michels will take on the incumbent Gov. Tony Evers (D), who is thought to be one of the most vulnerable Democratic governors going into November’s midterms.

Meanwhile, in Vermont, retired US Army officer Gerald Malloy was projected to win the state’s GOP Senate primary. And in Connecticut’s Republican Senate primary, Trump-backed Leora Levy handily won her primary by roughly 10 points. However, both will likely face uphill battles in the two New England liberal strongholds.

Tuesday night’s results were reminiscent of last week’s primaries in states like Arizona, where Trump’s favored candidates also did well. Wisconsin, for example, was yet another example of Trump winning out over the GOP establishment, much like he did in the Grand Canyon State, where Trump-backed Kari Lake defeated Karrin Taylor Robson in the gubernatorial primary.

But the ultimate test of Trump’s endorsement will come in the general election when his endorsed candidates will be tasked with winning over swing voters.

Another pro-impeachment Republican goes down

One of the biggest political developments happened not in the states holding primaries Tuesday night, but rather in Washington, which held its primaries last week.

Incumbent Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R), who represents Washington’s 3rd congressional district, conceded in her primary race against former Green Beret Joe Kent on Tuesday, marking yet another loss for a House Republican who voted to impeach Trump.

Herrara Beutler’s defeat comes one week after her fellow Washington Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.), who also voted to impeach Trump, managed to survive his primary. However, Michigan Rep. Peter Meijer (R-Mich.), another pro-impeachment Republican, lost his primary last week.

In her concession statement, Herrara Beutler said she was proud of what her and her team accomplished during her tenure.

“I’m proud that I always told the truth, stuck to my principles, and did what I knew to be best for our country,” she said.

Trump, on the other hand, celebrated Kent’s win and criticized Herrara Beutler in his own statement.

“Joe Kent just won an incredible race against all odds in Washington State. Importantly, I have knocked out yet another impeacher, Jaime Herrera Beutler, who so stupidly played right into the hands of the Democrats,” Trump said.

Kent will likely face a relatively easily general election, with the Cook Political Report rating the district as “solid Republican.”

Vermont poised to make history

Vermont is set to send the first woman and openly gay representative to represent the state on Capitol Hill after the state’s President pro tempore Becca Balint won the Democratic primary for the at-large House seat on Tuesday.

Balint defeated Vermont Lt. Gov. Molly Gray to represent the seat currently held by Senate candidate and Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.).

“We proved them wrong. I was the long shot. I was the underdog, ”Balint told her supporters of her at an election night party, according to Seven Days. “But this campaign wasn’t built on connections. It was built on relationships.”

Balint is heavily favored to win the general election in the deep-blue state going into November,

Bernie Sanders scores a win

Balint’s win also represented a high-profile victory for progressive leader and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who backed her in the primary.

“She will be a fighter for working people, and I look forward to serving with her in Washington,” Sanders said in a statement.

“In this next Congress, we could see the strongest progressive presence in a long time. Alongside Becca, I know that new members like Greg Casar, Summer Lee, Jonathan Jackson, and Delia Ramirez will all be fighters for a bold progressive agenda,” he added, citing other successful progressive candidates.

Her win brings much-needed relief to progressives, who have experienced a number of primary losses this midterm cycle, including former Texas House candidate Jessica Cisneros, former Missouri Senate candidate Lucas Kunce, and former Ohio House candidate Nina Turner.

A surprise nail-biter for a high-profile ‘Squad’ member

In one of the biggest surprises of the night, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), a member of the progressive “Squad” on Capitol Hill, just barely won her primary against former Minneapolis City Councilmember Don Samuels.

While Omar had the backing of progressive leaders like Sanders and had an incumbent’s advantage, she only led Samuels by just over 2 points with over 96 percent of the vote in.

Samuels conceded on Tuesday evening and pledged his support for Omar in the general election.

“The will of the people is the will of the people. Part of the effort to reach out to people, to talk to them on the phone, to go to their doors, to go to events, is out of deference for their decision-making freedom,” Samuels told the Sahan Journal. “To then violate that trust in people’s wisdom and not celebrate their decision, would be inconsistent with the democratic process.”

Samuels, who is a moderate Democrat, campaigned heavily on combatting violent crime as progressives like Omar embraced the “defund the police” movement. The primary could serve as a warning sign for progressives going into the general election as Republicans seek to make combatting crime a centerpiece of their campaign messaging.

Categories
Sports

Patrick Cripps court result, collision, video, Carlton, Brisbane Lions, Callum Ah Chee

UPDATE: Carlton is set to front the AFL’s appeals board to challenge the two-match ban handed down to skipper Patrick Cripps.

Cripps opted to challenge the suspension handed down by the AFL’s match review officer at the tribunal on Tuesday night, but it was unsuccessful, and now the Blues are attempting to have their captain freed once again.

The appeal will be heard at 6pm (AEST) on Thursday.

Despite the decision being upheld by the tribunal, clubs have the option of challenging a tribunal verdict at the appeals board as long as four conditions are met.

READMORE: Serena Williams drops bombshell retirement letter

READMORE: Aussie stars ‘gone’ in shock LIV Golf defection

READMORE: Final blow rocks Manly star’s World Cup dream

According to the AFL’s rules, the four conditions are listed as: error of law, that the decision was so unreasonable that no court acting reasonably could have come to the decision having regard to the evidence before it, classification of offense manifestly excessive or inadequate, and sanction imposed manifestly excessive or inadequate.

The incident in question occurred during the second quarter of Carlton’s loss to Brisbane on Sunday afternoon, when Cripps bumped Brisbane’s Callum Ah Chee high, with the hit leaving Ah Chee concussed.

Carlton skipper Patrick Cripps’ two-match ban for his high hit on Brisbane’s Callum Ah Chee has been upheld at the AFL tribunal on Tuesday night, in a mega blow to the Blues’ top-eight hopes.

If the appeal is unsuccessful, Cripps will miss Carlton’s remaining regular-season clashes with Melbourne and Collingwood after a court hearing that lasted almost two hours.

Carlton, who won eight of its first 10 games of the season before tumbling down the ladder, must win at least one of its last two matches to qualify for its first finals campaign since 2013.

Court chairman Jeff Gleeson said the Cripps incident fell into the “bumping of an opponent” category and it was not a reasonable way to contest the ball.

“He entered the contest at speed and saw a player in his peripheral vision, left his feet and bumped Ah Chee at high speed,” Gleeson said.

“He should have answered the ball differently. He could have taken the ball with his arms outstretched so there was no act of bumping at all.”

Cripps argued in court that his eyes were “purely fixed on the ball.”

“No way I can answer that ball without a collision being there,” he added.

“What I’m appealing to the members of the jury … if the ball is in dispute in an aerial contest, if that ball is in front of you and you can get it, you go for it. That’s your job as a footballer. “

Willie Rioli’s one-game ban for contact with Matt Rowell in round one was abolished at the tribunal, which Cripps’ laywer, Peter O’Farrell, raised on Tuesday night.

O’Farrell also argued Cripps didn’t bump Ah Chee.

“The incident occurred in an aerial contest in which players both had eyes on the ball. There was no bump,” he said.

“It was reasonable to answer the ball the way he did.

Footy Classified is now available as a podcast! Subscribe/follow via Manzana, Spotify or Google Podcasts.

“It wasn’t rough conduct, he didn’t bump … therefore it was not careless.”

O’Farrell also said it was “a very even contest with milliseconds in it.”

“The consequences of impact do not determine the reasonableness of an action,” O’Farrell added.

“Concussion is a serious issue in sport, but it’s not to be explained away by blaming players all the time.

“On occasion, there will be injury. Players can and do get hurt.”

On the contrary, AFL counsel Nicholas Pane argued Cripps wasn’t looking to contest the footy, rather “his intention was to forcefully bump Ah Chee.”

Earlier on Tuesday night, West Coast midfielder Tim Kelly failed in his attempt to scrap his one-match ban for a dangerous tackle on Adelaide’s Sam Berry.

Kelly’s tackle on Berry in the Eagles’ defeat to the Crows at Perth Stadium on Sunday had been assessed by the match review officer as careless conduct, medium impact and high contact.

Gleeson said the potential to cause injury was “significant”, reasoning that Berry was slung 360 degrees with his feet off the ground and the arm that could have protected his fall pinned.

For a daily dose of the best of the breaking news and exclusive content from Wide World of Sports, subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here!

Categories
Australia

Labor must amend trade agreements that allow foreign companies to sue the government over energy and climate policies | Patricia Ranald

An article in the Conversation with the catchy title “Hey Minister, leave that gas trigger alone” has urged the Labor government not to extend the Turnbull government’s gas trigger, which could be used to compel foreign-owned gas companies to keep gas reserves for use in Australia in some circumstances. It warns that actually using the trigger could inadvertently allow such companies to seek to sue the government under Australia’s existing international agreements.

Many Australians don’t know this but some of our trade agreements give foreign-owned companies special legal rights to sue the federal government if a change in law or policy reduces their profits, even if the change is in the public interest. The mechanism is known as an investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS).

It was this mechanism in a Hong Kong-Australia trade agreement that enabled Philip Morris to sue the Australian government over plain packaging laws in 2012. The Gillard government persisted with the legislation because it was an important public health policy. Successive governments fought and won the Phillip Morris case, although it took more than five years and cost taxpayers $12 million in legal fees.

In light of the ISDS risk, the Conversation article urges the government to seek out other solutions to the trigger mechanism to safeguard gas supplies, such as the Western Australian gas reservation model, which requires companies to reserve supplies for the local market before other transactions. However, ISDS also raises a broader matter of principle. Should governments simply accept the threat of being sued by a foreign company when we determine our own public policy?

I would argue no – it is not acceptable for companies to use this legal tool to curtail the democratic rights of governments to act in the interest of their citizens, especially on issues as important as energy supplies and climate change.

A recent study showed mining companies have been increasingly inclined to use the obscure legal tool to sue governments for billions in compensation over decisions that aim to phase out fossil fuels to combat climate change, and recommended ISDS be removed from trade agreements. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have warned that climate action is being threatened by ISDS clauses in trade agreements.

Cases already under way around the world include the US-owned Westmorland coal company suing the Canadian government because the Alberta province is phasing out fossil fuels, and the German-owned energy companies RWE and Uniper suing the Dutch government over similar policies. European governments want to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty because it includes ISDS provisions that are being used against climate change policies.

In Australia, the Coalition’s government policy on ISDS varied over the years. The Howard government did not agree to include ISDS in the Australia-US free trade agreement. But successive Coalition governments agreed to include it in the comprehensive and progressive trans-Pacific partnership between 11 Pacific rim countries, including Japan, as well as in bilateral agreements with China, Korea and Hong Kong. Companies from all these countries have fossil fuel or energy investments in Australia.

Discover the Australia Weekend app

However the Coalition government was influenced by the growing sentiment against ISDS. More recent agreements, including the regional comprehensive economic partnership between 15 Asia-Pacific countries, the Australia-UK free trade agreement, the interim Australia-India economic cooperation agreement, and the Australia-EU free trade agreement still under negotiation do not include ISDS.

The Albanese government’s policy platform explicitly opposes including ISDS mechanisms in new trade deals and pledges to review and remove ISDS from existing trade agreements.

“Labor views these provisions as contrary to the national interest and basic principles of democratic sovereignty and will not accept such clauses in any trade agreements,” the policy said. “Labor will not ask this of Australia’s trading partners in future trade agreements.”

But what about ISDS in existing deals? Labor has promised to review existing trade agreements and “seek to work with Australia’s trading partners to remove these provisions”.

There is growing evidence that ISDS provisions pose a real threat to governments wanting to take action on climate change. Negotiations with other governments to remove them from trade agreements should happen as a matter of urgency.

This would enable the Australian government to develop effective policies to combat climate change, without the threat of being sued by foreign-owned companies.

Categories
US

FBI’s search for Trump’s Florida estate: Why now?

WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI’s unprecedented search of former President Donald Trump’s Florida residence ricocheted around government, politics and a polarized country Tuesday along with questions as to why the Justice Department — notably cautious under Attorney General Merrick Garland — decided to take such a drastic step.

Answers weren’t quickly forthcoming.

Agents on Monday searched Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, which is also a private club, as part of a federal investigation into whether the former president took classified records from the White House to his Florida residence, people familiar with the matter said. It marked a dramatic escalation of law enforcement scrutiny of Trump, who faces an array of inquiries tied to his conduct in the waning days of his administration.

From echoes of Watergate to the more immediate House probe of the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, Washington, a city used to sleepy Augusts, reeled from one speculative or accusatory headline to the next. Was the Justice Department politicized? What prompted it to seek authorization to search the estate for classified documents now, months after it was revealed that Trump had taken boxes of materials with him when he left the White House after losing the 2020 election?

Garland has not tipped his hand despite an outcry from some Democrats impatient over whether the department was even pursuing evidence that has surfaced in the Jan. 6 probe and other investigations—and from Republicans who were swift to echo Trump’s claims that he was the victim of political prosecution.

All Garland has said publicly that “no one is above the law.”

A federal judge had to sign off on the warrant after establishing that FBI agents had shown probable cause before they could descend on Trump’s shuttered-for-the-season home — he was in New York, a thousand or so miles away, at the time of the search.

Monday’s search intensified the months-long probe into how classified documents ended up in boxes of White House records located at Mar-a-Lago earlier this year. A separate grand jury is investigating efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, and it all adds to potential legal peril for Trump as he lays the groundwork for a potential repeat run for the White House.

Trump and his allies quickly sought to cast the search as a weaponization of the criminal justice system and a Democratic-driven effort to keep him from winning another term in 2024 — though the Biden White House said it had no prior knowledge and current FBI Director Christopher Wray was appointed by Trump five years ago.

Trump, disclosing the search in a lengthy statement late Monday, asserted that agents had opened a safe at his home, and he described their work as an “unannounced raid” that he likened to “prosecutorial misconduct.”

Justice Department spokesperson Dena Iverson declined to comment on the search, including whether Garland had personally authorized it. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said the West Wing first learned of the search from public media reports and the White House had not been briefed in the run-up or aftermath.

“The Justice Department conducts investigations independently and we leave any law enforcement matters to them,” she said. “We are not involved.”

About two dozen Trump supporters stood in protest at midmorning Tuesday in the Florida summer heat and sporadic light rain on a bridge near the former president’s residence. One held a sign reading “Democrats are Fascists” while others carried flags saying “2020 Was Rigged,” “Trump 2024” and Biden’s name with an obscenity. Some cars honked in support as they passed.

Trump’s Vice President Mike Pence, a potential 2024 rival, tweeted Tuesday, “Yesterday’s action undermines public confidence in our system of justice and Attorney General Garland must give a full accounting to the American people as to why this action was taken and he must do so immediately.”

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell echoed Pence, saying, “Attorney General Garland and the Department of Justice should already have provided answers to the American people and must do so immediately.”

“The FBI director was appointed by Donald Trump,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., when asked about GOP allegations that the raid showed the politicization of the Justice Department. She added, “Facts and truth, facts and law, that’s what it’s about.”

Trump was meeting late Tuesday at his Bedminster, New Jersey, club with members of the Republican Study Committee, a group headed by Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana that says he is committed to putting forth his priorities in Congress.

The FBI reached out to the Secret Service shortly before serving a warrant, a third person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press. Secret Service agents contacted the Justice Department and were able to validate the warrant before facilitating access to the estate, the person said.

The Justice Department has been investigating the potential mishandling of classified information since the National Archives and Records Administration said it had received from Mar-a-Lago 15 boxes of White House records, including documents containing classified information, earlier this year. The National Archives said Trump should have turned over that material upon leaving office, and it asked the Justice Department to investigate.

Christina Bobb, a lawyer for Trump, said in an interview that aired on Real America’s Voice on Tuesday that investigators said they were “looking for classified information that they think should not have been removed from the White House, as well as presidential records.”

There are multiple federal laws governing the handling of classified records and sensitive government documents, including statutes that make it a crime to remove such material and retain it at an unauthorized location. Though a search warrant does not necessarily mean criminal charges are near or even expected, federal officials looking to obtain one must first demonstrate to judge that they have probable cause that a crime occurred.

Two people familiar with the matter, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation, said the search Monday was related to the records probe. Agents were also looking to see if Trump had additional presidential records or any classified documents at the estate.

Trump has previously maintained that presidential records were turned over “in an ordinary and routine process.” His son Eric said on Fox News on Monday night that he had spent the day with his father and that the search happened because “the National Archives wanted to corroborate whether or not Donald Trump had any documents in his possession of him. ”

Trump himself, in a social media post Monday night, called the search for a “weaponization of the Justice System, and an attack by Radical Left Democrats who desperately don’t want me to run for President in 2024.”

Trump took a different stance during the 2016 presidential campaign, frequently pointing to an FBI investigation into his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, over whether she mishandled classified information via a private email server she used as secretary of state. Then-FBI Director James Comey concluded that Clinton had sent and received classified information, but the FBI did not recommend criminal charges.

Trump lambasted that decision and then stepped up his criticism of the FBI as agents investigating whether his campaign had colluded with Russia to tip the 2016 election. He fired Comey during that probe, and though he appointed Wray months later, he repeatedly criticized him, too, as president.

The probe is hardly the only legal headache confronting Trump. A separate investigation related to his efforts by him and his allies to under the results of the 2020 presidential election — which led to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol — has also been intensifying in Washington. Several former White House officials have received grand jury subpoenas.

And a district attorney in Fulton County, Georgia, is investigating whether Trump and his close associates sought to interfere in that state’s election, which was won by Democrat Joe Biden.

___

Associated Press writers Terry Spencer, Meg Kinnard, Michelle L. Price, Lisa Mascaro, Alan Fram, Darlene Superville and Will Weissert contributed to this report.

.

Categories
Sports

Timo Werner returns to RB Leipzig from Chelsea in deal worth up to €30m

Timo Werner is on his way from Chelsea back to RB Leipzig after the two clubs confirmed a transfer agreement for the Germany international on Tuesday.

The deal — a permanent move for the 26-year-old — is reportedly worth in the region of €30 million, although various performance-related add-ons could be included.

– Mixed performances for Chelsea new boys against Everton
– Tuchel: Alonso wants to leave Chelsea
– Don’t have ESPN? Get instant access

“I’m very happy to be able to play for RB Leipzig again,” Werner, who has signed a four-year contract, said. “I had a great time here between 2016 and 2020, when we performed brilliantly as newcomers in the league. It was a dignified departure for me to leave the club as record goalscorer, but that’s in the past now and I’m looking ahead, because both I and the club have developed in the past two years.

“I had two great years at Chelsea that I’m really grateful for and were crowned with the Champions League trophy. The experience to play abroad in a new league really helped me and my career. Now I’m looking forward to the new season with RB Leipzig and above all to meet the Leipzig fans again, who mean a great deal to me. We want to achieve a lot and of course, I want to become the first Leipzig player to reach the 100-goal mark.”

Werner will be looking to get his career back on track ahead of the World Cup in Qatar after a disappointing two-year spell at Stamford Bridge.

He joined Chelsea in 2020 for €50m, opting not to take part in Leipzig’s rescheduled Champions League quarterfinal against Atletico Madrid — delayed due to COVID-19 — to give himself more time to adapt to English football.

Werner started well, scoring eight goals in his first 12 games up to mid-November, but managed just four more for the rest of the campaign as a loss of form and confidence set in.

Werner was completely left out of the Chelsea squad for the match against Everton as talks with Leipzig continued.

He has scored 23 goals in 89 appearances for Chelsea and although manager Thomas Tuchel is thought to be reluctant to part with the forward given the wider pressure to strengthen the squad, there is recognition the midseason World Cup has heightened the player’s fears over a lack of regular action.

Werner’s arrival follows Leipzig’s announcement on Tuesday that they had completed the signing of FC Salzburg striker Benjamin Sesko, who will officially join the club in July 2023.

“Timo Werner’s signing is a special transfer for us,” Leipzig technical director Christopher Vivell said. “We had a lot of great years together in Leipzig that saw Timo become the club’s record goalscorer and a Germany international. His return from him means a lot to the supporters because Timo was a real fan favorite and figure of identification for a lot of people .

“The transfer made a lot of sense to us, both because of Timo’s quality and the financial aspects of the deal. Now we want to build on the success that we started together and achieve our goals with Timo’s help. Not only does that mean qualification to the Champions League, but we also want to get as far as possible in the cup competitions.”

ESPN’s James Olley contributed to this story.

.

Categories
Australia

Animal welfare activists lose High Court challenge over ‘hidden camera’ laws

In a joint judgment, Chief Justice Susan Kiefel and Justice Patrick Keane said discussions of animal welfare are a “legitimate matter of governmental and political concern and a matter in respect of which persons may seek to influence government” but the laws did not amount to an impermissible restriction on the implied freedom.

They said the provisions furthered the legitimate purpose of preventing or deterring “trespassory conduct”.

While the majority of the court answered a narrower question about the validity of the laws, some judges considered how the law might apply to media outlets.

Justice Michelle Gordon said the provisions would “prevent, for example, media outlets communicating about footage that reveals unlawful conduct taking place at an abattoir or even unlawful conduct engaged in by the Government” if it was given to them by a trespasser. To that extent, Gordon said, the laws would be invalid.

In a dissenting judgment, Justice Stephen Gageler said the laws operated indiscriminately and imposed an impermissible burden on the implied freedom of political communication. Justice Jacqueline Gleeson agreed.

Justice James Edelman said Delforce had been “involved in many incidents of covered recording of farming activities involving considerable suffering of non-human animals”, and some of the images tendered in court “reveal shocking cruelty to non-human animals”. However, it had not been established in court that the practices were unlawful.

It meant the challenge in this case was confined to circumstances in which the Farm Transparency Project had published footage of lawful activities. Justice Simon Steward agreed the laws were valid.

Edelman said the court was not asked to, and did not, consider the wider application of the laws, such as a newspaper publishing a smartphone video taken by a gatecrasher at a private function that recorded government MPs discussing “an unlawful enterprise”.

The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here.

Categories
US

Afghan Muslim arrested for killings that shook New Mexico’s Islamic community

ALBUQUERQUE, NM, Aug 9 (Reuters) – A Muslim immigrant from Afghanistan has been arrested as the prime suspect in the serial killings of four Muslim men that rattled the Islamic community of New Mexico’s largest city, police said on Tuesday.

After days bolstering security around Albuquerque-area mosques, seeking to allay fears of a shooter driven by anti-Muslim hate, police said on Tuesday they had arrested 51-year-old Muhammad Syed, one among the city’s Islamic immigrant community.

Authorities said the killings may have been rooted in a personal grudge, possibly with intra-Muslim sectarian overtones.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

All four victims were of Afghan or Pakistani descent. One was killed in November, and the other three in the last two weeks.

A search of the suspect’s Albuquerque home uncovered “evidence that shows the offender knew the victims to some extent, and an inter-personal conflict may have led to the shootings,” police said in a statement announcing the arrest.

Investigators are still piecing together motives for the killings of the four men, Deputy Commander Kyle Hartsock of the Albuquerque Police Department said at a news conference.

In response to reporters’ questions, Hartsock said sectarian animus by the suspect toward his fellow Muslim victims may have played a role in the violence. “But we’re not really clear if that was the actual motive, or if it was part of a motive, or if there is just a bigger picture that we’re missing,” he said.

Syed has a record of criminal misdemeanors in the United States, including a case of domestic violence, over the last three or four years, Hartsock said.

Police credited scores of tips from the public in helping investigators locate a car that detectives believed was used in at least one of the killings and ultimately track down the man they called their “primary suspect” in all four slayings.

Syed was formally charged with two of the homicides: those of Aftab Hussein, 41, and Muhammed Afzaal Hussain, 27, killed on July 26 and Aug. 1, respectively, Albuquerque Police Chief Harold Medina told the briefing.

The latest victim, Nayeem Hussain, 25, a truck driver who became a US citizen on July 8, was killed on Friday, hours after attending the burial of the two men slain in July and August, both of them of Pakistani descent.

The three most recent victims all attended the Islamic Center of New Mexico, Albuquerque’s largest mosque. They were all shot near Central Avenue in southeastern Albuquerque.

The first known victim, Mohammad Ahmadi, 62, a native of Afghanistan, was killed on Nov. 7, 2021, while smoking a cigarette outside a grocery store and cafe that he ran with his brother in the southeastern part of the city.

BULLET CASINGS

Police said the two killings with which Syed was initially charged were tied together based on bullet casings found at the two murder scenes, and the gun used in those shootings was later found in his home.

According to police, detectives were preparing to search Syed’s residence in southeastern Albuquerque on Monday when he drove from the residence in the car that investigators had identified to the public a day earlier as a “vehicle of interest.”

Albuquerque and state authorities have been working to provide extra police presence at mosques during times of prayer as the investigation proceeded in the city, home to as many as 5,000 Muslims out of a total population of 565,000.

The ambush-style shootings of the men have terrified Albuquerque’s Muslim community. Families went into hiding in their homes, and some Pakistani students at the University of New Mexico left town out of fear.

Imtiaz Hussain, whose brother worked as a city planning director and was killed on Aug. 1, said news of the arrest reassured many in the Muslim community.

“My kids asked me, ‘Can we sit on our balcony now?’ and I said, ‘Yes,’ and they said, ‘Can we go out and play now?’ and I said, ‘Yes,'” he said.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Reporting by Andrew Hay in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Additional reporting by Rami Ayyub in Washington; Tyler Clifford in New York and Dan Whitcomb in Los Angeles; Editing by Jonathan Oatis, Cynthia Osterman, Daniel Wallis and Raju Gopalakrishnan

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

.