Intel has posted the latest Arc A750 graphics card gaming benchmarks across a wide selection of titles running DX12 and Vulkan API. The company proceeded to compare their mainstream card against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 at FHD & QHD and found out that their chip delivers better performance.
Intel Arc A750 Graphics Card Is Up To 5% Faster Than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Across 48 DX12 & Vulkan Titles
We have seen the Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition graphics card being tested across various titles previously and we also saw a selection of 1st-tier games where the Arc A750 is said to offer up to 17% better performance versus its competitors. Now, we are not just looking at 1st-tier titles but performance through a selection of 48 different DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles and 1080p & 1440p.
Intel Arc A750 Graphics Card Specifications
The Intel Arc A750 Limited Edition graphics card features a cut-down ACM-G10 “Alchemist” GPU with 448 EUs, 3584 ALUs, and 12 GB of GDDR6 memory running across a 192-bit bus at 16 Gbps, and a TGP around 200W.
The graphics card is powered by an 8+6 connector configuration which means a maximum board power of 300W (150W+75W from connectors & 75W power from the PCIe interface). The top Intel Arc A770 and Arc A750 graphics cards will come in Limited Edition flavors alongside custom designs from partners. The card features three DisplayPort 2.0 and a single HDMI 2.1 connector.
Intel Arc A-Series Desktop Graphics Card Lineup ‘Rumored’:
| Graphics Card Variant | GPU variant | GPU die | Execution Units | Shading Units (Cores) | Memory Capacity | memory speed | memory-bus | TGP | Price | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arc A770 | Xe-HPG 512EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 512 EUs (TBD) | 4096 (TBD) | 16GB GDDR6 | 16Gbps | 256-bit | 225W | $349-$399US | Officially Announced |
| Arc A770 | Xe-HPG 512EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 512 EUs (TBD) | 4096 (TBD) | 8GB GDDR6 | 16Gbps | 256-bit | 225W | $349-$399US | Confirmed Through Leak |
| Arc A750 | Xe-HP3G 448EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 448 EUs (TBD) | 3584 (TBD) | 8GB GDDR6 | 16Gbps | 256-bit | 225W | $299-$349US | Officially Announced |
| Arc A580 | Xe-HPG 256EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 256 EUs (TBD) | 2048 (TBD) | 8GB GDDR6 | 16Gbps | 128-bit | 175W | US$200-$299 | Confirmed Through Leak |
| Arc A380 | Xe-HPG 128EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G11 | 128 EU | 1024 | 6GB GDDR6 | 15.5Gbps | 96-bit | 75W | $129-$139US | Officially Launched |
| Arc A310 | Xe-HPG 64 (TBD) | Arc ACM-G11 | 64 EUs (TBD) | 512 (TBD) | 4GB GDDR6 | 16Gbps | 64-bit | 75W | $59-$99US | Confirmed Through Leak |
Intel Arc A750 Graphics Card Performance
Performance was tested using the same systems running an Intel Core i9-12900K CPU, a high-end Z690 motherboard and 32 GB (16 GB x2) DDR5 memory running at up to 5600 Mbps speeds. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 was running the GeForce 516.59 drivers while the Arc A750 was using an engineering driver.
As for performance, the card trades blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 in various titles. At 1080p, the Intel Arc A750 graphics card is an average of 4% faster in DX12 and 3% faster in Vulkan versus the competition. At 1440p, the difference widens by a bit with the Arc A750 delivering up to 5% better performance in both Vulkan and DX12 titles. This means that at higher resolutions, the Intel Arc graphics card will have a slight advantage over the competition despite both cards having the same 12 GB memory buffer.
Following is the full performance breakdown:
Products mentioned in this post